Jump to content
  • Sign Up

yoni.7015

Members
  • Posts

    603
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by yoni.7015

  1. > @"Teratus.2859" said:

    > > @"yoni.7015" said:

    > > > @"Zoid.2568" said:

    > > > > @"yoni.7015" said:

    > > > > > @"Zoid.2568" said:

    > > > > > > @"yoni.7015" said:

    > > > > > > No thanks, underwater combat is no fun.

    > > > > >

    > > > > > They can make it fun with a revamp.

    > > > > No, they can’t and they don’t have to. Just leave it like it is.

    > > > >

    > > > >

    > > >

    > > > So leave ít boring when ít can be fixed??

    > >

    > > It will stay boring and the majority of players don’t like underwater content. So why waste resources on something only a very small minority enjoys?

    > >

    >

    > Fair enough, then lets get rid of Raids, PvP, WvW, Fractals and Strike missions then because only a minority of players enjoy those as well.

    > 100% focus from here on out only on PvE story..

    > Lets also get rid of the most underused/underpowered classes as well and stop making new specs for them.. since that's a waste of resources as well.

     

    That’s a terrible comparison but okay.

     

     

  2. > @"Zoid.2568" said:

    > > @"yoni.7015" said:

    > > > @"Zoid.2568" said:

    > > > > @"yoni.7015" said:

    > > > > No thanks, underwater combat is no fun.

    > > >

    > > > They can make it fun with a revamp.

    > > No, they can’t and they don’t have to. Just leave it like it is.

    > >

    > >

    >

    > So leave ít boring when ít can be fixed??

     

    It will stay boring and the majority of players don’t like underwater content. So why waste resources on something only a very small minority enjoys?

     

  3. > @"Yggranya.5201" said:

    > > @"yoni.7015" said:

    > > > @"Zoid.2568" said:

    > > > > @"yoni.7015" said:

    > > > > No thanks, underwater combat is no fun.

    > > >

    > > > They can make it fun with a revamp.

    > > No, they can’t and they don’t have to. Just leave it like it is.

    > >

    > >

    >

    > That's not up to any of us. If you expect other people to suddenly start thinking like you and just quietly stop posting suggestions for its improvement, then prepare for disappointment.

     

    I don’t expect that, this is a forum where people can express their opinions on things, right? You should acknowledge that not everyone thinks like you and you should respect that.

     

     

  4. > @"Yggranya.5201" said:

    >

    > > @"Loboling.5293" said:

    > > Makes me feel like they are polishing some things out, which is always appreciated in a long running game.

    >

    > Sounds to me like anet has noticed player numbers dropping, and are doing a last-ditch effort to retain who they have. You know, fulfil player wishes in hopes of keeping them playing (and paying). Cynical? Maybe.

    >

    > And no, i'm not saying the game is dying. just stating the more likely scenario.

    >

     

    To me it doesn’t sound like that at all. I too think that the game is still well populated, I never have any problems finding people to do something.

     

     

  5. > @"Generosity.3794" said:

    > This is an incredible penalty for someone who has only ever transferred once. I transferred so that my guild could introduce me to WvW and what to do, after grinding for days and finally completing my gift of battle track and my warclaw track I discover that I can’t get the mount for another 10 days?!? Why would they design the mount process to need something I’m not allowed to get? Why wasn’t this mentioned anywhere? It took me a lot of googling to even figure out the problem. There isn’t any mention of this when you transfer.

    > Thanks for nothing Anet.

     

    Just wait the ten days, it’s no big deal.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...