Jump to content
  • Sign Up

snoow.1694

Members
  • Posts

    237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

snoow.1694's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. Told you guys that Herald will become a problem, even if I was slightly off with my „wEaVeR bUff“ lmao
  2. Please bring back the Vermilion Tail Feather Skin for Black Lion Statuettes or offer it in the gemstore, my Credit Card is ready! Much thanks in advance! :# ![](https://i.imgur.com/Uyo9H0k.jpg "")
  3. I think we can talk about the first sign of an unwinnable situation when you get +1ed somewhere, survive through kiting, bind them and your team still manages to lose the rest of the map in a 4v3. But then again, every game can be winnable - happens all the time that a team gets a grip halfway through the match in games that most would consider unwinnable
  4. > @"Falan.1839" said: > Yeah, everything fixed. Rev still a premium class with 4 meta builds, resistance rune nerf making condi sider builds more obnoxious than ever, Burn DH untouched except for a bugfix, the META IS FIXED GUYS. > > Except that I mentioned both, Burn DH and Rev. If we say both specs will be nerfed in the future, there is really not anything problematic left, except maybe Soulbeasts as sidenoders. All the problematic specs falling slowly out of meta will also enable less played classes like Mesmer
  5. > @"Dawdler.8521" said: > Where is the maybe option? This poll is a sham! I got exposed :o
  6. > @"Sven.7201" said: > That's a super good idea if it works as atended! I think it is a great idea too. All jokes aside it would be easy to implement and would better the situation in general
  7. > @"Stand The Wall.6987" said: > > DON'T STOP BELIEVIN Lmao 9 and a half hours to go and we got our answer
  8. Unless the CAPTCHA involves us picking pics of traffic lights I don‘t want to hear about it
  9. Thing with endless 1v1‘s is participants are at fault if it doesn‘t end for playing too tanky builds, including you. Run bers amulet and you won‘t get a 3 minute 1v1, big promise
  10. > @"Svez Poizon XD.5268" said: > Yes and nerf teef! YES AND NERF THE STEALERZ
  11. Thing is - if a big balance patch would be coming, they would/should announce it a few weeks earlier and we haven‘t gotten anything in the past weeks. I still hope a balance patch is coming next update, but I think you are right and Anet won‘t deliver, despite all the frustration right now
  12. Yes, more stealth on classes that aren‘t supposed to use stealth is exactly what this game needs. Also who except Necros could use that broken rune?
  13. Nothing is happening in PvP - we don‘t get new content, new rewards, regular balancing or any feedback. Sad to see how the mode is declining and how little is done to stop it. Maybe you are working on something we don‘t know about, but as it is right now, many don‘t even bother to log on anymore for sPvP
  14. Another month of this unfun meta, not even going to bother to log on
  15. Most top players do exactly what you are trying to stop, pushing far directly or from close to far into a 1v1 they know they will win and if they get +1‘ed, they stall through kiting and jumping puzzles in order to bind people in a 2v1, while the rest of the map falls into their hands in a 4v3, winning them the match. You pretend like they are afk‘ing on point and leaving the rest up for slaughter when in reality they are in a 1v1 or 2v1 at far 90% of the time with the exception when they defeat an enemy, whom they basically spawn camp from that point on, leaving the rest of you in a 4v4 while one point is constantly ticking in your favor This whole talk of „only play close and mid“ is typical gold division talk - players who get baited in a 2v1 or 3v1 at their close against one tanky scrapper/decap druid/soulbeast/spellbreaker/weaver and lose the rest of the map, because they refuse to send someone far are daily proof of that. Playing sides will always be more strategically favorable than playing close and mid
×
×
  • Create New...