Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Telgum.6071

Members
  • Posts

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Telgum.6071's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. Mostly agree. I almost always run with the signet for the passive because I don't see use for the others. That banner... unnecessarily underpowered except during very specific circumstances. I want to carry it on my back. The Juggernaut skill, I'm trying to force myself to use it but again, it feels underpowered and sometimes I think it would be better to just wait for cooldowns. The Spb bubble... well I like it. But I don't like the selfstun of this Berserker spec. I feel the entire Berserker spec is trash. Personally, because I don't like neither the berserker mode mechanic (cooldown, spam Decapitate, headbutt...) and I also dislike the abilities. Though I'd like a support EoD specialization, I wouldn't mind another DPS class if they do something like the Spellbreaker who doesn't entirely rely on a single mechanic.
  2. > @"Grand Marshal.4098" said: > > @"Telgum.6071" said: > > At this point support is the class with most sense for the warrior, a well designed spec could give us a **permanent place** on WvW zergs, a meta build in PvP and with enough luck, a guaranteed place on fractals/raids. We don't need a new DPS spec for that, just some improvements for the current one. > > Isn't that Support Spellbreaker for open field zergs? Even for GvG groups. There is also a less popular might-share Berserker with battle standard running around for GvGs mostly. > > Healbreaker in PvP is as meta as it gets, not to mention Burstzerkers always being a glass cannon option which can down in 2 or 3 hits. > > In any case, as long as this new spec has a traitline dedicated to damage, some decent self-defense and minors that work well, I'll be fine. 3 Support traitlines though is a major no. I've played them all. Spellbreaker WvW is a bubble bot and Zerker in GvG isn't a thing compared to other DPS classes (and that zerker with banner is the class I play the most). HEalbreaker in PvP is something good in my opinion, but I'm on silver so who knows. The thing is Spellbreaker is a good tank but a mediocre support. I personally want a real support with healing and/OR buffing abilities. Well, Firebrand can be used as either support or condition damage, and I think power is good too. I want the same, it doesn't need to be 100% support. > @"Grand Marshal.4098" said: > > @"Fueki.4753" said: > > > @"Grand Marshal.4098" said: > > > Isn't that Support Spellbreaker for open field zergs? Even for GvG groups. There is also a less popular might-share Berserker with battle standard running around for GvGs mostly. > > > Healbreaker in PvP is as meta as it gets, not to mention Burstzerkers always being a glass cannon option which can down in 2 or 3 hits. > > > In any case, as long as this new spec has a traitline dedicated to damage, some decent self-defense and minors that work well, I'll be fine. 3 Support traitlines though is a major no. > > > > People want a **real** support elite specialization. > > Spellbreaker offers nothing supportive to Shout Spellbreaker, the support all comes from core. > > > > How is that fun tho? How will that allow you to tag bags? How will it feel like warrior and not guardian (the heavy armored profession with plenty of support capabilities). In the end what we say here doesn't matter, but I've yet to see anyone proposing a meaningful spec focused on "support" that feels like warrior and is not just some type of support we can get by fixing core (mobile banners on the warrior, with pulsing boons when traited on top of their flat stat increase, would take care of a lot of folk who want to support as warriors). Boom, Discipline, Tactics and ANY spec and you got yourself a support. Berserker does damage well, SPellbreaker does strips well. The new specs needs something NEW for warrior, not something we already have and can buildcraft with. > > In any case, we are in the long waiting game now until we get info from anet. In my opinion it doesn't have to be a copy of the guardian, I think warrior makes more sense buffing allies, giving them alacrity, might (perhaps even breaking through the 25 stacks limit) or even carrying banners on the back or something like that. A better version of the bannerslave but also compatible with wvw and pvp and ranged capabilities outside the condition longbow and the single-target rifle, able to empower itself and its allies. Yeah, I would like that. The banner bot has a permanent place in all the raid bosses with only two abilities, imagine a well designed spec around the banners :#
  3. Absolutely. While I prefer DPS roles, all core, berserker and spellbreaker already work in most game modes. Meanwhile support is a banner/bubble bot nearly useless, I would like to see a Defense rework + Commander specialization, relying on shouts, banners or another new warrior ability. With pistols in both hands, so we get new ranged options. Monk would be nice too, but we already have the Daredevil so I wouldn't bet for it. At this point support is the class with most sense for the warrior, a well designed spec could give us a permanent place on WvW zergs, a meta build in PvP and with enough luck, a guaranteed place on fractals/raids. We don't need a new DPS spec for that, just some improvements for the current one.
  4. > @"Lan Deathrider.5910" said: > http://gw2skills.net/editor/?PKwAEdflJwSYXMRWJOST6LPA-zRJYiRNfZEYKERFYy0IgZAA-e > > Great sword + axe/axe. Maurader, might upon might, heals on might gain, lots of endurance gain for dodging. Dodge when you need to, heal at 50% hp, preferably when you have conditions for more healing. > > You can run defense mid top top instead of tactics if you prefer. Mace shield instead of dual axes or the greatsword if you need a cc set for breakbars. Brave Stride now gives stab on movement skills with a 1s CD, but gw2Skills is not updated yet. I'm not sure if that build is up to date but, does that have more survival and damage than spellbreaker if you remove the Tactics branch? I think Spellbreaker has more damage but I'm not so sure about the survival chances. Sure Full Counter is good but Tactics sustain is also good.
  5. I would like to see a Balthazar spec. Greatsword, allowing to switch between both melee and ranged combat like Balthazar
×
×
  • Create New...