Jump to content
  • Sign Up

AzureShiron.7658

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AzureShiron.7658

  1. My biggest gripe is, the humans got a human centric expansion, the sylvari got one with a lot of lore and info for them, but the charr and norn have to share their 'expansion'? the charr already get shafted on a lot so this has left a very bad taste in my mouth. The writing has been fairly solid but the previously stated has left my view on the full thing tainted.

  2. > @"Fueki.4753" said:

    > > @"AzureShiron.7658" said:

    > > > @"Fueki.4753" said:

    > > > > @"AzureShiron.7658" said:

    > > > >

    > > > > > Because I don't like tengu.

    > > > >

    > > > > have you considered you're boring then ;3c

    > > > >

    > > >

    > > > Have you considered we are bored of the constant begging for more races then?

    > >

    > > Someone took that a bit too close to heart. I was teasing them.

    >

    > I just meant to throw the same type of comment you did back at you,

    > leaving it to you to interpret it the same way as you wanted your comment to be interpreted.

    >

    > I personally don't care too much of more playable races, but I simply can't see how one would become commanders of the pact.

    > How would they even be introduced to dungeons? Other races have no ties to Destiny's edge and therefore no business in trying to mend their problems.

    > And then there is the chapter V of the personal story that is about studying the lesser races of Tyria. It might not sit well with Tengu and Kodan (which also have been frequently asked for). By all appearances, Kodan see all life as equal, so there would be no lesser races for them.

    > Kodan also are all about balance and nature, so they should actively oppose killing the dragons.

    >

    > And then there are the technical aspects, like fitting all armours and outfits onto new playable races, which would take away resources that should go to the development of the expansion itself.

    >

    > But this thread should be about dwarves, not about bears and birds.

     

    I was sure that my comment would come off as playful that's why i added the ;3 at the end. Obviously that wasn't the case and i failed there. Taste is subjective and no one is right or wrong on that. And maybe asking for new races does get tired out frequently but its something obviously many people want.

  3. > @"Fueki.4753" said:

    > > @"AzureShiron.7658" said:

    > >

    > > > Because I don't like tengu.

    > >

    > > have you considered you're boring then ;3c

    > >

    >

    > Have you considered we are bored of the constant begging for more races then?

     

    Someone took that a bit too close to heart. I was teasing them.

  4. > @"Fat Disgrace.4275" said:

    > Over rated and hyped race. Play big powerful norn or charr

     

    You take that back. Also i cant play male norn due to their triangle necks. (female norn look good though but i still don't play one)

  5. > @"Ashantara.8731" said:

    > I have to agree with you. I have only three Charr characters because of this, and for all of them, it was extremely hard to find something they can actually wear without looking completely ridiculous. One ended up with an outfit, two are wearing cultural armor pieces for most part.

     

    The cultural sets dont even fit well on the charr either. The heavy t 1 and 2 set along with the t2 med set clip from the back where the tail comes out. There is no tail spot for them.

  6. Im honestly so very disappointed with Anets continued unwillingness or inability to design things that look good on charr. Not even in a charr-centric update! The charr chair was extremely disappointing. The new armor skins either clip or look odd on charr. I have five charr characters and its extremely hard to get any of them to look remotely good because of it! Is this just how its going to be from now on? Like, should i just drop the game as a regular thing to play till an update comes out because anet just will not design good things for charr. (and before people say anet doesn't make things for charr because few people play charr, the reason few people play charr is because nothing looks good on them!)

  7. I've noticed that with these surprisingly charr heavy living world updates they've added a few things that actually look good on charr. (though again its still only shoulder and glove armor because anet hates making full sets.) I'm hoping with the possibly charr themed expansion coming we finally get good charr content. (and maybe theyll make it so pauldrons dont look stupidly big and silly on them.)

  8. > @"Tommo Chocolate.5870" said:

    > Totally agree with the OP - reading about the Charr in the art book was what got me into GW2 in the first place. I actually think the Charr cultural armour designs are great, but some of those designs haven't been implemented well (e.g. because of [tail-clipping](https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Magus_armor "tail-clipping") and [floating shoulders](https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Legion_armor "floating shoulders")).

    >

    > > @"AzureShiron.7658" said:

    > > they still haven't fixed the cultural armor that for some reason clips and stretches on them even though it was designed for them

    >

    > Which one is that? I've never noticed it, but I haven't used all of them.

    >

    > There are also several [things](https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/File:Martinus.jpg "things") [worn](https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/File:Guardian_(PvP).jpg "worn") [by](https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/File:Tycho.jpg "by") [Charr](https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/File:Soldier_(NPC).jpg "Charr") [NPCs](https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/File:CulturePaletteCharrNPCs_-_Render.jpg "NPCs") that aren't available to players, at least some of which [are compatible with light armour](https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/File:Korukhan_the_Blacksmith.jpg "are compatible with light armour"). It'd be great if we could finally get those - same goes for NPC clothing for the other races as well.

     

    Medium tier 2 and tier 1 for heavy if im remembering correctly.

  9. ![](https://huntersinsight.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/whitestripedcharrpv1.png "")

    I want you guys to look at some of the Eotn armors they had on the charr. It looks fantastic! The horns dont vanish when a healm is put on them they look like they designed that armor for the charr and not just stretched out a current set of armor and slapped it on to them. ![](http://wiki.guildwars.com/images/c/c8/%22Charr_Group%22_concept_art_2.jpg "")

    ![](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f9/83/15/f98315abd5574d04febd0077b0ffd034.jpg "")

    I mean look at the charr with the flame thrower! How the mask is designed to fit around the muzzle, how the rest of the armor fits him aesthetically! When i got the art book back before the game even came out and saw these designs for charr i had such high hopes, only for them to continually be crushed. The gem store stuff is finally starting to at least look good on charr but I dont want to have to constantly shell out money just to look good, and for it to just be an outfit! I want to mix and match sets! > @"Iris Ng.9845" said:

    > Unpopular opinion here because I really enjoy the ferocious bestiality aesthetics of the charrs and the range of unique styles for charrs are surprisingly not as limited as, say, for Norn male. I love every bits of the exaggerated hairstyle, horn, and facial features, and even the oddly scaled shoulder pieces. [i'm currently having 3 charrs of all three weight classes and 5 different armors for them.](https://imgur.com/a/1kKQOtN "I'm currently having 3 charrs of all three weight classes and 5 different armors for them.") Compared to my older set of asura, they are relatively new additions but definitely more stylish ones.

     

    I agree with you on how amazing those charr look with what you mixed and matched with them, but the problem is that its very hard to do so, more so if you like the way one armor set looked on one race and than realize oh, it looks horrible on charr.

  10. > @"Stalkingwolf.6035" said:

    > thats why a changed my race back then. i started a Charr female warrior and playing 298h with her. but everything looked bad and dull. especially hats.

     

    Exactly. Hats and healms remove your hair and horns like, come on! Why did you make a race like this playable if youre not even going to bother putting in any effort! I remember how great a lot of the stuff the art book had on charr armor, hell the gw1 charr had great armor still!

  11. I'm glad to see that the charr are slowly getting things in the gem shop that look good on them. (And by good i mean they finally started adding a place for their tales, for the most part) but you still run in to the issue of the make over kit things looking terrible. Most of the charr make over looks are silly or outlandish or just very out there and its really disheartening. I see all these new hair styles and faces for the other races and than we get some smooshed in face, really silly and outlandish hair, and just over all trash. The armors in game still dont look as well as they could (and they still haven't fixed the cultural armor that for some reason clips and stretches on them even though it was designed for them).

     

    My question is this, will Anet actually start putting content out that looks good on charr, I get that not a lot of people play charr but im positive its for all the above reasons, nothing looks good on them. Cause let me tell ya im getting really disheartened each time i see other players walking around and than there i stand looking terrible.

×
×
  • Create New...