Jump to content
  • Sign Up

October European PvP Power Rankings


Vallun.2071

Recommended Posts

> @Vallun.2071 said:

> > @shadowthejedi.3089 said:

> > I find my rating of 80 quite interesting. Whether you think I'm role playing or not, my ability to theorycraft and mechanical knowledge of ranger is second to literally none. I'm listed as 80 but does an 80 repeatedly embarrass top 20 players? These ratings are comical considering no one on that list spends even an 8th of my time internalizing skill cooldowns and perfecting skill rotations. This increases my awareness as it allows me to watch my opponent rather than my skillbar. I look on that list and im sure 90% of them play meta. I literally invented my own viability off meta. I invented the soulbeast. Say what you want, but there's a reason both Miaz and Rom as well as countless no names have inquired about my variety of off meta builds.

> >

> You killing someone not even on my power rankings? not impressed :)

>

>

 

You're next. You know it's going to happen sooner or later. You'll end up just like Gusmi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Vallun.2071 said:

> The October European PvP Power Rankings are based on observable performance and objective results such as Win Ratios, Tournament Exposure, Mechanical Skill, Rotational Knowledge, Decision Making and Effective Communication. Inactive players have been excluded from the list to promote participation in the community.

>

> These values have been gathered from multiple sources in the competitive EU scene and should reflect the general consensus of the skill level of the community despite individual player opinions. With the release of Path of Fire, players have been judged on their ability to adapt to the new meta despite obvious imbalances.

>

> Warrior:

> Boyce _ 91

> Goku _ 90

> Obindo _ 89

> Vans _ 89

> Iriel(core) 88

> Misha _ 86

> Madchild _ 85

> Edson _ 83

> Thybz _ 82

> Trama _ 80

> Briseis _ 76

> Hirys _ 76

> Fara _ 75

> Ajaxx _ 75

> Roberto _ 74

> Corion _ 73

>

> Necromancer:

> Wing _ 88

> Sinid _ 87

> Posi _ 85

> Imda _ 81

> Vebryan _ 80

> Lord Asura _ 78

> Azurrs _ 77

> Bartek _ 77

> Hybrid _ 76

> Ace _ 76

> Hollts _ 76

> Domoscrub _ 75

> Heis _ 74

>

> Guardian:

> Tage _ 92

> Mancow _ 90

> Zan _ 88

> Blackjack _ 87

> Tolfdir (dps) 85

> Obindo _ 84

> Grim Kram (dps) 83

> Cookie _ 83

> Tayzyr _ 81

> Uchiha (dps) 79

> Kranox _ 75

>

> Thief:

> Sindrener _ 92

> Aieone _ 88

> Tolfdir _ 86

> Tisar _ 85

> Kaitori _ 83

> Aurora _ 82

> Hybrid _ 76

> Panda _ 76

> Azyro (staff) 76

> Sizer (s/p) 73

>

> Mesmer:

> Misha _ 95

> Helseth _ 89

> Alcazaro _ 86

> Frostball _ 85

> Singa _ 81

> Hyperiel _ 79

> Mysthesia _ 75

> Enigma _ 73

> Zenvo _ 72

>

> Revenant:

> Jonasdon _ 88

> Ebrush _ 88

> Trekon _ 85

> Aurora _ 84

> Tenebrae _ 78

> Azzurs _ 76

> Briseis _ 75

>

> Elementalist:

> Slash _ 85

> Crann _ 84

> Sinid _ 78

> Rubadub _ 74

> Quadrel _ 78

>

> Ranger:

> Xomixom _ 85

> Grim Kram _ 85

> Miaz _ 84

> KeesFlodder _ 84

> Frosty Bowman _ 83

> Kol _ 82

> Shadow the Jedi (roleplay) 80

> Erzian _ 80

> Alcazar _ 79

> Pedohirsch _ 77

> Paraphrenia _ 76

> Suffish _ 75

>

> Engineer:

> Zan _ 95

> Hyperiel _ 86

> Thijsken _ 85

> Kaaiserz _ 80

>

>

 

These figures do not take into account the dependence of the occupied place on either the composition of the groups, or on the one who plays solo and who is in the composition of the groups played.

 

I even say terrible words: according to an interesting combination of circumstances, the first five professions of the list are qualitatively and quantitatively superior to other professions.

 

This strangely matches, for example, the proposed format ranked arena 5x5.

That is, we can assume that the first five places of professions are provided by those who participated in the composition of the groups played.

Of course, this is the most useful profession in pvp.

 

Perhaps I need a break from pvp.

In my opinion ranked arena is just dead

First: the lack of balance of professions makes participation in pvp meaningless only if not SB or Scourge

And the second: the lack of a distinct uniform selection in the opposing groups.

If there are 2 or more SB or Sourge in one group, and the second group does not, the second group will always lose.

 

I'm not interested in this

 

For information: in the ended season (my second pvp season), participating in ranked arena 5x5 alone (solo game) in more as for 200 games received gold 1 playing only as a ranger (core ranger / soulbeast).

After upgrading PoF the comfort of the game as the ranger fell sharply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Witimir.5982 said:

 

> These figures do not take into account the dependence of the occupied place on either the composition of the groups, or on the one who plays solo and who is in the composition of the groups played.

>

> I even say terrible words: according to an interesting combination of circumstances, the first five professions of the list are qualitatively and quantitatively superior to other professions.

>

> This strangely matches, for example, the proposed format ranked arena 5x5.

> That is, we can assume that the first five places of professions are provided by those who participated in the composition of the groups played.

> Of course, this is the most useful profession in pvp.

>

> Perhaps I need a break from pvp.

> In my opinion ranked arena is just dead

> First: the lack of balance of professions makes participation in pvp meaningless only if not SB or Scourge

> And the second: the lack of a distinct uniform selection in the opposing groups.

> If there are 2 or more SB or Sourge in one group, and the second group does not, the second group will always lose.

>

> I'm not interested in this

>

> For information: in the ended season (my second pvp season), participating in ranked arena 5x5 alone (solo game) in more as for 200 games received gold 1 playing only as a ranger (core ranger / soulbeast).

> After upgrading PoF the comfort of the game as the ranger fell sharply.

 

nice dissertation, needs more evidence though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @shadowthejedi.3089 said:

> I find my rating of 80 quite interesting. Whether you think I'm role playing or not, my ability to theorycraft and mechanical knowledge of ranger is second to literally none. I'm listed as 80 but does an 80 repeatedly embarrass top 20 players? These ratings are comical considering no one on that list spends even an 8th of my time internalizing skill cooldowns and perfecting skill rotations. This increases my awareness as it allows me to watch my opponent rather than my skillbar. I look on that list and im sure 90% of them play meta. I literally invented my own viability off meta. I invented the soulbeast. Say what you want, but there's a reason both Miaz and Rom as well as countless no names have inquired about my variety of off meta builds.

>

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV4EHGpFnww

 

I knew the list was rubbish when I saw your name on the list.

 

Self promoting scrub- if that's what you're rp'ing, you are doing great!

That's all you've ever been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...