> @"BlueJin.4127" said:
> > @"Xiomaro.2563" said:
> > In my (very subjective and probably controversial on the GW2 forums) opinion, GW1 was a far superior game for its time.
> >
> > I think a modern GW1 would have done better in the long run than GW2 has. Even if the current fans of GW2 may not have liked it as much, I think others who don't currently play GW2 would have been more into it. GW1 had some ARPG-esque elements with the map-like open areas and grinding those zones for unique green items etc. Expanding on this idea could have been really popular with current gaming trends.
> >
> > Not to mention the PVP was much more varied and esports-like (let's not forget that was one of the goals for GW2).
> >
> > I have always wished they just took GW1, added open world areas where you can come across other players, add WvW etc but stuck with the formula. Dual professions, GvG, missions, more flexible skill system and so on.
>
> GW1 is much more polished, focused, and has depth. Outside of profession balance and some missing QoL features, GW1 is very well made. GW2 is a shallow and mindless zerg-fest with too many issues that seem to go against what the game is trying to accomplish. Since the 2 games are so different, it’s not possible to say which game is more fun; that is completely subjective. But in terms of how well the games are made, GW1 is far superior.
Can you proof your words, especially your last sentence or are your words only smoke and sound? No examples given. "In terms of how the games are made" with this words you mean the coding of the games? You have seen the coding of the games? Or do you mean balancing, gameplay, world etc. , because as you say befor "that is completely subjective".
A tip from me: First you look out for some data about the topic you want to discuss, then you use the data to make a conclusion in your mind (pls dont have a opinion and then only look out for data to proof it), to proof your conclusion you link the data. Explain everything in detail, because i dont know what you mean with "with too many issues that seem to go against what the game is trying to accomplish" . What are the issues of the game (i know some issues for me personally, but not your/the problems). What does the game want to accomplish, i dont know what you think the game want to accomplish. Pls tell us. If you want say your experience = data, then your data is subjective and this fine, but dont claim to be objective with sentence like this: "But in terms of how well the games are made, GW1 is far superior."
Correct would be:" I think Gw1 is in terms of how well the games is made, far superior."