Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Blood Red Arachnid.2493

Members
  • Posts

    2,157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Blood Red Arachnid.2493

  1. Just did some of my own testing. Keeping 3 phantasms up is still the best way to do dps. I tried sustaining clones with infinite horizon, sustaining clones with sand shards, shattering clones with infinite horizon, shattering clones with sand shards, etc. All of them came out weaker than simply using auto in melee range with 3 duelists up. Infinite horizon simply cannot buff clones enough to make them competitive.

     

    Granted, the clone spam builds can do quite a bit more AoE damage, which was a weakness of the condi mesmer beforehand. But otherwise, this is a strictly DPS spec that has poor DPS.

  2. I'm just glad there's a source that explains what all of the Deadeye steal skills are. In my theorycrafting the biggest variable was that I had no idea what marks did, so I had to constantly discount a third of the traits because they interact with the steal skills.

  3. Power Staff Ele is pretty helmet. Mostly you just camp fire and use lava font + meteor when they're off cooldown. Against large targets you'll have really good damage. Power Engineer is also pretty simple. You camp the bomb kit, using surprise shot and blunderbuss when they're off cooldown. To maximize damage the rotation is hard, but the simple method still puts out a lot of low maintenance damage.

     

     

  4. I've had the exact opposite experience. I play rev in WvW, and I see warriors everywhere. It is one of the few classes that can reliably kill me while roaming. It wins the auto attack war, while also out-pacing my mobility and my defenses. I mean, in a gigantic zerg the warrior isn't too useful, but it is far from useless. I lament whenever I see a warrior come over the hill.

  5. So far, the answer is no. I will list the reasons why:

     

    1. The traits, utilities, and weapon only serve two purposes: personal defense and personal damage. There is no control skills, unique group buffs, or meaningful environmental effects.

    2. The utilities are based around managing clones, but clones are relatively useless in all forms of play. The spec has not significantly buffed clones to compensate for this.

    3. It is a mesmer, and signs point to this spec's damage being less than stellar. For a spec that exists solely to do damage, poor damage is a killer.

     

    It might be fun to mess with for awhile, but it isn't going to be particularly useful.

  6. The short version: PVE condi rev will get a mild boost to DPS due to Kalla's Fervor. Otherwise, it is really useless. The shortbow is buggy, underpowered, and terrible. The utilities are too expensive and unreliable. The F skills are more expensive and more terrible than the utilities. The traits are obtuse and don't help with anything. It has nothing useful to offer in PVP, WvW, or power builds.

  7. The best thing I can recommend is sound judgement. All the choices that QT and metabattle make for their builds aren't arbitrary. They're done for specific reasons. So long as you can ration out which trait or skill will be better than others for a particular place.

     

    Use the gear. You'll want to use the recommended raid/fractal gear for three reasons:

     

    1: In case you want to do raids/dungeons, you'll be prepared.

    2: You can always change your traits and utilities easily, but changing your gear is expensive and hard.

    3: Difficulty with playing the game in glass cannon gear is often a l2p issue. As you get better at the game, you'll need defenses less and less.

     

    EDIT: O.K., I have no idea why the text appears as gigantic caps locked mess when I try to make a list.

  8. In debates I've had with people on these forums, I've ended up on response chains that would span 7 or 8 posts per wave. That's 30,000 characters, over and over again. The whole time, shouting down somebody who's clearly too stubborn to listen, perusing my work for nitpicks and forcibly misconstruing what I say. It is a bit silly to demand that everybody on the forums engage in this kind of hullabaloo over every issue. The fact is, not everyone wants to engage a person they disagree with, nor do they want to post simple epithets that serve as food to subsist the ego of that person.

     

    Down votes serve as a simple, yet meaningful way to express dissent or dissatisfaction without having to deal with the usual nonsense that follows.

  9. > @Cyprien.4208 said:

    >

    > I always find it stupid of people to post that they should just use the search function or google to find answers. Sure you may find the answer but it might take a person anywhere from one min to an hour to do so. It also negates the reason why they ask in the first place.

     

    Well, obviously it is meant to negate the reason asking in the first place. The whole reason why we say "check the wiki" is because we want to teach these people self-determination. A lot of time and effort can be saved if they'd just learn the same techniques that lead the people asking to come to that knowledge which they desire.

     

    ------------------------------------------------------

     

    As I said in another thread, I have mixed feelings about the thumbs down option. I generally don't like positivity circles, and a thumbs up only option encourages this. It has been my general experience that a disagreement on an issue is a result of character flaw, and there are plenty of people I'd like to lightly admonish. I don't want to spend my entire day explaining to somebody why their thoughts are wrong, especially when they've spent a lifetime cultivating an immunity to criticism. A down vote is a method to simply demonstrate that somebody is in the wrong without having to deal with their usual nonsense that follows.

×
×
  • Create New...