> @"lare.5129" said:
> > @"Carcharoth Lucian.1378" said:
> >proof
> proof is me. I am sure taht t is more stable that some link or etc.
> as I see I found same 4 things .. where cc requirements come more softly after cc consum nerf
> some of they gives me solid vision that it not some mistake, it is many fixed and mechanic change what we have, but about that we not read on patchnotes.
> Ask about unblock rework, after that threse 4+ fixs look like small pixel on cinema .
>
Well, since the phase is back now, I guess your "proof" wasn't really all that solid, was it? Guess it was a bug after all.