Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Aaron.1294

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Aaron.1294's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. and tbh... why should they follow this idea even tho it hasn't been workin since... I dunno EVER.
  2. @"Kodama.6453" I agree with scourge but with thief naaah... and with scrapper... wat does that even mean?
  3. @"Kodama.6453" U don't expect warr to be a support when u're choosing this class as ur main or W/E. If u want a support and u want to fullfill ur role as such - just play guardian. This is one of thpse things dat I don't understand. Ppl want support spec but tell me wat another elite support spec can do dat any other support variants can't? De only way to make it work is just "make just the same skill but with increased duration and decreased smthn". And we probably end up again with just a copypaste of tempest and guardian combined - just worse bcuz warr have the highest health pool and heavy armor.
  4. @"Pati.2438" I actually feel ya, but I'm scared dat if it become overpowered well/ they can't get rid of banners sadly so they probably nerf it and it'll be another bannerslave spec :cry:
  5. Guys,do u rly want to make warr even more boring than it is now? W/E
  6. @"Lan Deathrider.5910" No one trait protection bcuz it's useless compared to immobilize on daze, and resistance is mainly for full counter to constantly hit. Try again ;) oh and full counter is not a block .
  7. it'd have been personal sustain IF it wouldn't be AoE and would deal actual dmg. But it feels like a normal, generic skill instead which is slightly meh :/
  8. @"Pati.2438" such a cool idea but sry we have banners dud.
  9. @"Pati.2438" that's literally "banners" logic. And as u can see it's bad and boring. We need on warr more complex spec dat would eventually make warr a "nice, fluent and enjoyable" class. But ofc, support is fun and very interactive. Hope they make it and everyan will regret this decision bcuz they just make another banner-based class but with support bursts - great.
  10. @"Lan Deathrider.5910" berserker is more like carry rather than support. basically bcuz they don't have unblockable daze AoE cc dat spb has
  11. There's a reason why spellbreaker is a support and core warrior isn't - it's all about full counter. And I don't think dat u'll see any core warr playing as a support. Because core warr is too focused on 1v1s
  12. And we already have spec dat is just for supporting - tactics
  13. @"Kodama.6453" Scrapper is form of a support and should've been bcuz it was Anet's intention, just like spellbreaker. However players discovered builds dat are just better and more fun than "intentions" dat's why they swapped to these builds. End of story
  14. @"draxynnic" controling ur enemyt espec in teamfights is a form of supporting them. Spellbreaker is literally the only class dat has unblockable daze cc on 8 sec cd. CONTROLING UR ENEMY IS A FORM OF SUPPORTING UR TEAMMATES. Espec bcuz CCs don't deal dmg. Jeeez...
×
×
  • Create New...