Kovu.7560 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 The idea of bidding for server transfers brought a smile to my face. =) ~ Kovu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry CCH.9816 Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 everyone agree right ?? :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ubi.4136 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Nope. This is what they should do. 1. Open ALL servers. 2. Make the transfer fee to high population servers 10k gems. 3. Reduce the number of players that can be on each map to 50. Everyone gets to play where they want. Anet should make a little money. It might reduce the lag and help control/even out the blob sizes. The bandwagon servers will have to wait in longer ques, which they should since they are the ones who overstacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry CCH.9816 Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 > @"Ubi.4136" said: > Nope. This is what they should do. > > 1. Open ALL servers. > 2. Make the transfer fee to high population servers 10k gems. > 3. Reduce the number of players that can be on each map to 50. > > Everyone gets to play where they want. > Anet should make a little money. > It might reduce the lag and help control/even out the blob sizes. > The bandwagon servers will have to wait in longer ques, which they should since they are the ones who overstacked. good for another plan :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azizul.8469 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 should be 20k... moah money to anet for living world development...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry CCH.9816 Posted December 8, 2017 Author Share Posted December 8, 2017 > @"azizul.8469" said: > should be 20k... moah money to anet for living world development...... i think 5400 Gem is good numbers and not expensive :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titan.3472 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Make is 10 000 Gems and you have a deal xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarCayne.3098 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 > @"Titan.3472" said: > Make is 10 000 Gems and you have a deal xD Bit low. 100,000 gems for first transfer, then add 50K gems each additional transfer -- so $100, $150, $200, etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaLeVoLenT.8129 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 If Gems cost this much to transfer, the community would be entertaining the idea of using the RMT market instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulion.5476 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 I would prefer that A-net makes wvw more competitive than bandwagon to win. Wvw needs a few comeback mechanics to make servers have some hope of winning. Instead of my server do not have enough player to win so lates transfer to another server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joneirikb.7506 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 > @"Ulion.5476" said: > I would prefer that A-net makes wvw more competitive than bandwagon to win. Wvw needs a few comeback mechanics to make servers have some hope of winning. Instead of my server do not have enough player to win so lates transfer to another server. Wouldn't a "comeback mechanic" actually be against "competitive" ? I mean what could be more casual than to basically ignore the score the other team worked for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulion.5476 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Wvw is not a fair competition. Competitions start of fairly matched but once things start taking a turn for the worst the match should be over fast. With wvw the match continue for days after its decided why? Comeback mechanic would encourage players throughout the week instead of taking the week off because the match-up has been decided. Yes thats what casual wvwer do they ignore the score and play for fun. I just want servers to matter more than everyone just bandwagoning to a server to win(better fights). Wvw has issues with keeping players and wvw not being fair is part of the problem. A comeback mechanic would make it fun for the server that losing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetoII.3782 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 > @"Choppy.4183" said: > > @Swamurabi.7890 said: > > Yes, then each transfer lowers the map cap of said server by 1-5 players. > > The hilarity of BG suddenly swamped by people desperate to overstack, only to find they get queues after they have a dozen people on the map, and then having those same people flock to different servers, might break the internet. > > On the plus side, it might fully fund gw3. :D Greatest Idea Ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReaverKane.7598 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 I'd suggest the opposite. Make Transfering from Full servers to the lowest pop ones FREE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry CCH.9816 Posted December 10, 2017 Author Share Posted December 10, 2017 > @"ReaverKane.7598" said: > I'd suggest the opposite. > Make Transfering from Full servers to the lowest pop ones FREE. i dont think so . anet need money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justine.6351 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Open BG and remove their que caps. I want to see their level of depravity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReaverKane.7598 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 > @"Jerry CCH.9816" said: > > @"ReaverKane.7598" said: > > I'd suggest the opposite. > > Make Transfering from Full servers to the lowest pop ones FREE. > > i dont think so . anet need money Yeah, cause server transfers are the main source of their income. The gem price is a deterrent not a primary source of income. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDchiaScrub.3241 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 > @"ReaverKane.7598" said: > > @"Jerry CCH.9816" said: > > > @"ReaverKane.7598" said: > > > I'd suggest the opposite. > > > Make Transfering from Full servers to the lowest pop ones FREE. > > > > i dont think so . anet need money > > Yeah, cause server transfers are the main source of their income. The gem price is a deterrent not a primary source of income. Okay then cite the actual data proving that...in 2017. D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xillllix.3485 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 You know the best thing about being on a full server? It's never full. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trae.2384 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 > @"GDchiaScrub.3241" said: > No. Make it RNG where it randomly selects 1 of the servers with no duplicates. So you could eventually get there after spending more and more on the chance to get to BG. When you have all 30 you can stop. > > Wait what was the OP? AHHHHHH lololz thats funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumba.3174 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Yes great idea then we end up with every player being in the dominat server and all the other servers have 0 population... **Talk about pay to win.** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoebe Ascension.8437 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Tbh full is a lie. Some server wich lots of 'NEW blood' are not full but have way more 'wvw hours played' then other servers, yet the server with a lot of wvw vets (not playing atm, or taking break) are super easy full, yet have super low wvw hours played. Full is a lie. Hence the transfer lock is a lie too. I would have no problem with this. It would create bandwagon but counter bandwagon too. Now a lot of people want to move from bottom server to medium servers but some of those are even full (wich is bullshit). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbill.7483 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 I'm also in the camp that says "free transfers to tier 8". I'd also like to add an incentive to move; if you fight on a tier 8 server last week you get and additional PIP chest, similar to the PIP chest you get for completing the wood chest the previous week. I think there are enough PIP hunters in WvW that this could help players "self-level" the population balance in WvW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReaverKane.7598 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 > @"GDchiaScrub.3241" said: > > @"ReaverKane.7598" said: > > > @"Jerry CCH.9816" said: > > > > @"ReaverKane.7598" said: > > > > I'd suggest the opposite. > > > > Make Transfering from Full servers to the lowest pop ones FREE. > > > > > > i dont think so . anet need money > > > > Yeah, cause server transfers are the main source of their income. The gem price is a deterrent not a primary source of income. > > Okay then cite the actual data proving that...in 2017. D: Because they don't want you to change servers. It's not a behaviour that they encourage in 2017 or any other time. Does it provide income for them that people are lazy and have no sense of pride and just bandwagon to the winning server? Yes. Would they rather have it not happen? Yes. It's like traffic fines. Sure cities earn a lot from them, but they'd rather have well ordered traffic and safe streets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry CCH.9816 Posted December 11, 2017 Author Share Posted December 11, 2017 > @"Justine.6351" said: > Open BG and remove their que caps. I want to see their level of depravity. B) make High Gem for xfer to full server is good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now