Add seasonal rewards to Unranked. Let the people who don't care about PvP play there.

[bLind.6278]

All the current system does is force players that want cheaper legendary armor to play in Ranked, which is significantly impacting games for people that actually want to be there for competitive play. I understand trying to give people an incentive to play ranked, but you're doing in wrong. Give them an incentive to play sPvP, and if they then find they enjoy it and want to continue, they can make the choice to play ranked.

 

I'm tired of having 1-2 people in every game that aren't trying, aren't putting forth effort, or who obviously have no fucking clue how to play sPvP but are there because they want the rewards that they earn regardless of performance. Of course they're not going to actually try, there is literally no reason to do so.

 

Open up the possibility to earn seasonal rewards from unranked play during seasons. Let all of the PvE players play their unranked games and have a mess of a time without forcing them to absolutely ruin the experience for the people that are actually there for the competitive game mode.

[Meteor.3720]

> @"bLind.6278" said:

> who obviously have no kitten clue how to play sPvP

 

Aren't you the guy who just complained about treb being OP?

 

Rewards should stay in ranked imo. Otherwise there's no distinction between ranked and unranked, or casual/ competitive play.

[Shirlias.8104]

What about rewards only on unrankeds?

Then those who like SPvP will play it just because of it ( no1 will be there in order to farm golds, rewards, etc... ).

[bLind.6278]

> @"Meteor.3720" said:

> > @"bLind.6278" said:

> > who obviously have no kitten clue how to play sPvP

>

> Aren't you the guy who just complained about treb being OP?

>

> Rewards should stay in ranked imo. Otherwise there's no distinction between ranked and unranked, or casual/ competitive play.

 

What distinction is there to ranked otherwise? This game is not an esport. There is no competitive "scene." If you remove the rewards from ranked, then there IS a distinction from casual/competitive play, because the competitive players will still be in ranked and the casual ones wont be.

[bLind.6278]

> @"Shirlias.8104" said:

> What about rewards only on unrankeds?

> Then those who like SPvP will play it just because of it ( no1 will be there in order to farm golds, rewards, etc... ).

 

I'd be fine with that, too.

[Meteor.3720]

> @"bLind.6278" said:

> > @"Meteor.3720" said:

> > > @"bLind.6278" said:

> > > who obviously have no kitten clue how to play sPvP

> >

> > Aren't you the guy who just complained about treb being OP?

> >

> > Rewards should stay in ranked imo. Otherwise there's no distinction between ranked and unranked, or casual/ competitive play.

>

> What distinction is there to ranked otherwise? This game is not an esport. There is no competitive "scene." If you remove the rewards from ranked, then there IS a distinction from casual/competitive play, because the competitive players will still be in ranked and the casual ones wont be.

 

And all the bad players who think they're good and "competitive" will remain in ranked anyway. Plus the people who want to have fun against better players, even if they themselves are bad or want to try out troll builds, will also stick to ranked. So it doesn't really solve anything.

[bLind.6278]

> @"Meteor.3720" said:

> > @"bLind.6278" said:

> > > @"Meteor.3720" said:

> > > > @"bLind.6278" said:

> > > > who obviously have no kitten clue how to play sPvP

> > >

> > > Aren't you the guy who just complained about treb being OP?

> > >

> > > Rewards should stay in ranked imo. Otherwise there's no distinction between ranked and unranked, or casual/ competitive play.

> >

> > What distinction is there to ranked otherwise? This game is not an esport. There is no competitive "scene." If you remove the rewards from ranked, then there IS a distinction from casual/competitive play, because the competitive players will still be in ranked and the casual ones wont be.

>

> And all the bad players who think they're good and "competitive" will remain in ranked anyway. Plus the people who want to have fun against better players, even if they themselves are bad or want to try out troll builds, will also stick to ranked. So it doesn't really solve anything.

 

You're right. Doing nothing is always a better idea to doing something.

[FyzE.3472]

OR reward only the winning team. Not my idea btw. There was enough topics about it on these forums already...

[Wolfric.9380]

no rewards on loosing hard .... One side below 300 gives nothing for the looser (no pip no other rewards except the reward track progress). Unranked must give more for AFK ing than rankend or you will always get garbage matches in ranked due to people not caring to win.

[MarshallLaw.9260]

> @"bLind.6278" said:

> I'm tired of having 1-2 people in every game that aren't trying, aren't putting forth effort, or who obviously have no kitten clue how to play sPvP but are there because they want the rewards that they earn regardless of performance. Of course they're not going to actually try, there is literally no reason to do so.

 

This certainly is an issue in lower tiers and will continue to be as the "zero effort" players crawl through the season tracks, 3 pips at a time.

I don't mean to sound too harsh, but if you want to play with better people, you may need to improve your own game also. Unfortunately, you'll need to either get lucky or carry hard on a few matches to push into low plat/high gold (at least) to see an improvement on the quality of your team mates.

 

Moving the ranked rewards into unranked would be fairly detrimental to the population playing. Realistically people require more incentive to be in ranked other than the leader-board position.

IMO - no reason to make rewards equal - ranked should be given more than unranked.

[messiah.1908]

lets assume that the matchmaking wont gonna changed much

 

what if you will see players mmr and average team mmr at the beginning of each fight?

 

will it force ppl at the start to play or the afk?

 

if the enemy team has much higher mmr it will realize in the game anyway so ppl will afk

but if the enemy team has same or lower mmr most player will stay and fight even if they do mistakes? isnt it?

 

atm afk is random . someone make mistake and other goes afk without knowing that 100-300 can be turned to 500-400...

 

regarding rewards it may stom the pve or noobs from entering but maybe also stop the casual new player who wanna be pvper

 

so maybe give title or distinguish badge to show off with

 

[Ziggityzog.7389]

Helllll no. Leave the big stuff where it belongs. Ranked has become a cesspool on it's own by having hackers, bots, reward hunter afks, and wintraders roam free. Let the trash stay where it is. I enjoy my unranked where it's not a toxic dumpster fire, don't bring those pugs here.