Should they keep forest?

[Rufo.3716]

So much toxicity comes from this map. Wondering what everybody else thinks. Should it stay, or go?

[Math.5123]

It's probably the most balanced and skillful map in the game. At least in the soloQ fiesta that we have today.

You can kite sidenodes, you can no-port. You can use the objective to get back or push further ahead and there are plenty of LoS spots.

[Crinn.7864]

Forest is literally the best laid out map in the game. I'd be pissed if it was removed just because the secondary objective is regrettable.

[NaturallyNick.4058]

I'd rather they remove Temple of the Silent Storm. Getting pinged for 1-3k an auto while fighting in mid from a ranger on that center overpass (not the ramp that leads down to Tranquility. The one even above that, that exists only as an in-map buff to rangers) is rage inducing. You try and ping them back? "Obstructed"

 

Enjoy your 20+ second walk to them while they pelt you with so much ranged damage that it feels like storming the beach of Normandy.

[BeLZedaR.4790]

Svanir is bae yo

[Airdive.2613]

Forest of Niflhel has historically been the favourite map of the community, not sure what you're getting at.

[sephiroth.4217]

It's easily one of the better maps...

 

[Crab Fear.1624]

> @"Rufo.3716" said:

> toxicity

 

 

[Chaith.8256]

You know your poll f'd up when the best option to represent my views is: "AMG, I LUV KILLING BEASTS"

 

Seriously, where is the option to change the incentives for killing beasts or a rework?

[Alatar.7364]

Indeed, it's one of the good maps, even though I am tired of playing the map so often.

Had to pick the biased option just so I can vote my mind...

[Imperadordf.2687]

Legacy and Forest are the best (and most likely favourite) maps in this game. Not sure why would you ask to remove it.

[Rufo.3716]

> @"Chaith.8256" said:

 

> Seriously, where is the option to change the incentives for killing beasts or a rework?

 

Because we all know they will never do that. That and after I made the poll I realized I f'ed up and forgot that option.

[Fenom.9457]

We need more maps, not less

[ArthurDent.9538]

We should remove all maps because they all have secondary objectives that our teammates sometimes screw up. Then pvp will just be the free for all arena in heart of the mists such fun much innovation.

[Malediktus.9250]

I prefer if they would delete the coliseum map

[Crystal Paladin.3871]

> @"Rufo.3716" said:

> So much toxicity comes from this map. Wondering what everybody else thinks. Should it stay, or go?

 

If it's unfavourable to you, should it go??? Even I don't like skyhammer and kyhlo(coz of lot of running around) but if the team you play with is synergistic and you align with their plan, it becomes fun and you'll enjoy it... If you prefer to do only one thing ie stay mid kill all players and win matches, that's unfair for the less tanky ones... So secondary objectives helps them to even the scores ;)

[Trigr.6481]

Where's the option in the poll to remove skyhammer?

[Vague Memory.2817]

I thought the poll was about removing all trees and foliage from maps so you can actually see what the hell is going on most of the time. But if I had to remove a map it would be Skyhammer and not Forest of Niflhel.

[Blackari.2051]

or maybe players should finally learn and understand when it is a good time to push for secondary objectives.....

[Mbelch.9028]

Yet another poorly worded poll that I won't vote on because it shoves words in your mouth. Keep forest, but continue educating newbies about when and when not to get beast.

[BEETLEjay.2459]

> @"Mbelch.9028" said:

> Yet another poorly worded poll that I won't vote on because it shoves words in your mouth. Keep forest, but continue educating newbies about when and when not to get beast.

 

This is how the option for keeping the map should have been worded. Even with the mocking words it remains the top choice though. ?