Why does the flame themed springer look so terrible compared to the other flame mount?

[Mewcifer.5198]

The fire effect on the springer looks very different than the other flame themed mounts. They don't blend into the design of the mount the way the flames on the others do. And the striped designs look really awkward and jagged (why is it striped anyways?). And the flame take dyes in really weird ways. I hate to be critical over things like this, but it just looks like way less effort was put into it compared to the others.

 

Would it be possible to have it redesigned? It might be too late for that since people already have the mount. Maybe a second flame themed springer could be made? One that more closely matches the look of the other flame mounts?

 

For reference here is all the flame themed skins so far:

Raptor - https://wiki.guildwars2.com/images/9/9f/Flamelander.jpg

Springer - https://wiki.guildwars2.com/images/c/c1/Primal_Hare.jpg

Jackal - https://wiki.guildwars2.com/images/6/6b/Pyroclast.jpg

Griffon - https://wiki.guildwars2.com/images/1/1e/Fire_Pinion.jpg

Beetle - https://wiki.guildwars2.com/images/5/53/Trailblazer_%28mount_skin%29.jpg

Warclaw - https://wiki.guildwars2.com/images/0/0c/Embermane_Warclaw_Skin.jpg

[Blood Red Arachnid.2493]

The springer is the only one that's fuzzy.

[Mewcifer.5198]

> @"Blood Red Arachnid.2493" said:

> The springer is the only one that's fuzzy.

 

That wouldn't mean anything when it comes to the flames.

[Fenom.9457]

Makes me realize we still need fiery skimmer and skyscale skins huh

[derd.6413]

because the flames "replace" fuzz on springer and not the other mounts

[Ben K.6238]

Bunnies shouldn't be too well-done; they're already a bit gamey as it is.

[Mewcifer.5198]

> @"derd.6413" said:

> because the flames "replace" fuzz on springer and not the other mounts

 

The funny thing, it doesn't even replace the fur, the fluff is still there under that ugly mass of "flames"