BadSanta.6527
-
Posts
190 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Articles
Gallery
Posts posted by BadSanta.6527
-
-
no! what kind of part you want rifle to cover ?
crowd control - long bow cover
conditon ? - shortbow cover
support- staff cover
we need dps orianted spec in my opinom or crowd control support spec ( scourage like )
-
hello , kind of want to get in to warriar and want to know whats the roll of mace
-
why no remove ca and insted glyphs change base on your pet family ?
-
just wish for druid rework
-
1. no more raides contant please
2. new elite specs
3. new class
4. new maps with meta events like hot and world boss
5. with mastery they will have problome so idont know
6. new dungens !!!!
7. new skins
8. new leggy
-
thr druid buffs so random i dont get it , ps druid need overall rework , its not agame of numbers
-
i bet you will buy the expac , even not in lunch you will buy it eventully. becuse it seems you like the game and like me i can say 100 more times that i dont like what they done with my beloved ranger class and yet i bought both epxac at lunch and im sure ill hate the 3rd elite also but you know i make my pieace with it and ill buy it
-
Careful what you wish for , I always wanted to be druid “the mage of the forest “ (maybe a shapeshifter) but look what i got ...... maple stoey cleric with the name druid
-
healer as druid ?
-
> @"Sobx.1758" said:
> > @"BadSanta.6527" said:
> > > @"Sobx.1758" said:
> > > > @"BadSanta.6527" said:
> > > > > @"lare.5129" said:
> > > > > current half traits can be/should be more re thinkable, and you think will be addeded one more trait row, and rebroken after next "changes in class/trais" ???
> > > > > forget about new usless elite spec. We have 5 biulds meta from 27 variations. Make same 5 meta from 36/48/64 have zero value.
> > > > > I get portal on thief without any elite spec.. So main changes can come without any expansion.
> > > >
> > > > I agree but still that thinking that next epac will be given every class elite and for us well icant call both druid and soulbeast elite well ranger will stay far far from behaind
> > >
> > > If you "can't call druid/soulbeast ranger elites", then what elite would you expect for ranger for it to count as one? What would be YOUR idea?
> >
> > Ofcurse icant , druid was desigent for raids only , yeha you can play it well in pvp but it dosent change the fact that its was for raids and raids only ( majority of the player dont to raids) comon astral force is carp , glyps only one was "worth it" unti the nerf, and lets not talk about staff auto,.,,, ithink its a shame
> > and soulbeast only one gimmeick the merga and skil f3 in kind of something
>
> It seems you didn't understand the question. I never asked why you don't consider them elites. It's irrelevant to me, because I disagree with that opinion regardless. I'm not looking for justification and I don't plan to change your mind about that, because what's the point.
>
> The question was:
> "If you "can't call druid/soulbeast ranger elites", then **what elite would you expect for ranger for it to count as one? What would be YOUR idea?**"
Simple , something that will change my play style .. that what is elite all about. Iwish elite like necro reaper and scurage i think both play there roll perfectly. Also dragon hunters
-
> @"Kodama.6453" said:
> > @"BadSanta.6527" said:
> > > @"Sobx.1758" said:
> > > > @"BadSanta.6527" said:
> > > > > @"lare.5129" said:
> > > > > current half traits can be/should be more re thinkable, and you think will be addeded one more trait row, and rebroken after next "changes in class/trais" ???
> > > > > forget about new usless elite spec. We have 5 biulds meta from 27 variations. Make same 5 meta from 36/48/64 have zero value.
> > > > > I get portal on thief without any elite spec.. So main changes can come without any expansion.
> > > >
> > > > I agree but still that thinking that next epac will be given every class elite and for us well icant call both druid and soulbeast elite well ranger will stay far far from behaind
> > >
> > > If you "can't call druid/soulbeast ranger elites", then what elite would you expect for ranger for it to count as one? What would be YOUR idea?
> >
> > Ofcurse icant , druid was desigent for raids only , yeha you can play it well in pvp but it dosent change the fact that its was for raids and raids only ( majority of the player dont to raids) comon astral force is carp , glyps only one was "worth it" unti the nerf, and lets not talk about staff auto,.,,, ithink its a shame
> > and soulbeast only one gimmeick the merga and skil f3 in kind of something
>
> Druid was not made solely for raids.
> It is a support spec focused on healing. Which can also get used in other content like WvW, fractals, etc.
>
> The thing is that the big majority doesn't **want** to use a healer spec. Most people still consider dps to be the only real playstyle in PvE outside of raids. With that mindset, Anet would have to create nothing but damage dealer e-specs in the future, which would be terribly boring. Having variety is nice.
again you prove my point that it is raids only , if the demand for "healing" spec is raids only... and there is bid diffrent between support and healing. it was at first op becuse of its support that never ment to be and now look at it
-
> @"Sobx.1758" said:
> > @"BadSanta.6527" said:
> > > @"lare.5129" said:
> > > current half traits can be/should be more re thinkable, and you think will be addeded one more trait row, and rebroken after next "changes in class/trais" ???
> > > forget about new usless elite spec. We have 5 biulds meta from 27 variations. Make same 5 meta from 36/48/64 have zero value.
> > > I get portal on thief without any elite spec.. So main changes can come without any expansion.
> >
> > I agree but still that thinking that next epac will be given every class elite and for us well icant call both druid and soulbeast elite well ranger will stay far far from behaind
>
> If you "can't call druid/soulbeast ranger elites", then what elite would you expect for ranger for it to count as one? What would be YOUR idea?
Ofcurse icant , druid was desigent for raids only , yeha you can play it well in pvp but it dosent change the fact that its was for raids and raids only ( majority of the player dont to raids) comon astral force is carp , glyps only one was "worth it" unti the nerf, and lets not talk about staff auto,.,,, ithink its a shame
and soulbeast only one gimmeick the merga and skil f3 in kind of something
-
> @"anduriell.6280" said:
> > @"BadSanta.6527" said:
> > > @"lare.5129" said:
> > > current half traits can be/should be more re thinkable, and you think will be addeded one more trait row, and rebroken after next "changes in class/trais" ???
> > > forget about new usless elite spec. We have 5 biulds meta from 27 variations. Make same 5 meta from 36/48/64 have zero value.
> > > I get portal on thief without any elite spec.. So main changes can come without any expansion.
> >
> > I agree but still that thinking that next epac will be given every class elite and for us well icant call both druid and soulbeast elite well ranger will stay far far from behaind
>
> I get your drift but a new spec will not fix ranger. We will have a meme spec with over-the-top skills which quickly will be nerfed to the oblivion (same as it happened to drid and soulbeast) and ranger will still be useless where it matters (competitive modes).
>
> I would like them to fix what we have now:
> * fix all the weird bug and bad interactions core skills and traits have with the specs.
> * Rework the traitlines. We have some unidimensional ones like Markmanship or Bestamastery, other are weird and useless like Nature magic and Smirimisk . So ranger only has one build in competitive modes.
> * Rework all the pets. So they can offer value to the Druid, to the Ranger and to the soulbeast. All of them.
> * Rework the utility skills. Ranger has the stabilities in 60s CD... Even the soulbeast which is supposed to be able to enter in melee more often. Not without stability we don't.
> * Rework some weapons. Some weapons are so badly design they aren't used anywhere.
>
> And then yes, let's talk about next specs. Ranger hasn't got any of the much needed reworks during it's all life span while other classes like revenant or mesmer are already on their 3rd.
I feel you , it is annoying that they made bad work on the elite and then in order to cover all the flows in the class they op and then nerf to the ground . But i absolutely cant call druid ranger elite spec and soulbeast the work it is not in the level for game like that
-
> @"lare.5129" said:
> > @"BadSanta.6527" said:
> > I agree but still that thinking that next epac will be given every class elite and for us
> At first I don't understand why some people see any tie between exp and new elite .. That can be new common some fly/move skill, some new digging skill no matter for that class and etc .. May be some new additional resistance attribute system and etc.
> Anet can impress me. And I am sure that new elites not impress me and normal players. Now ranger have 50% useless/obsolete traits, some slack in skills vision, so any new line or trait will fade target from old rework. So will hope we will get some atnoher path for expand, but not half working trait line and bored possibility use some additional weapon.
>
>
i dont get it why people dont think we will get more elite spec , to be honst we most likely to get rather then not., base on expriesne on both expanstion + its help raise the sales .
-
> @"lare.5129" said:
> current half traits can be/should be more re thinkable, and you think will be addeded one more trait row, and rebroken after next "changes in class/trais" ???
> forget about new usless elite spec. We have 5 biulds meta from 27 variations. Make same 5 meta from 36/48/64 have zero value.
> I get portal on thief without any elite spec.. So main changes can come without any expansion.
I agree but still that thinking that next epac will be given every class elite and for us well icant call both druid and soulbeast elite well ranger will stay far far from behaind
-
dear arenet staff , i hope your all well at wierd times like this .
ihave only one requst , for the next espec please let anouther dev to be incharge. both elite soulbeast and druid feels not belonge to the class and kind of wierd. dont get me wrong ireno is great but when it comes to ranger i feel very disappointment and iknow its not just me.
im really afraid that the next expac will be the last nail in the ranger coffin with evrey classs wil get an even cooler elite while all we get is kicks in exhange for our pet? ilost my faith in ireno please please please hear me out
-
> @"mistsim.2748" said:
> Excellent, focused nerfs. Now people might try other builds that aren't faceroll. We'll be seeing a lot more condi Soulbeasts.
>
> GS is less mandatory now. Try shortbow people, it's good man.
>
> Their next step as I see it is to bring Druid back up. Staff needs a rework.
> @"mistsim.2748" said:
> Excellent, focused nerfs. Now people might try other builds that aren't faceroll. We'll be seeing a lot more condi Soulbeasts.
>
> GS is less mandatory now. Try shortbow people, it's good man.
>
> Their next step as I see it is to bring Druid back up. Staff needs a rework.
One can hope they will work on druid. But the problem is that druid was designed for raids , and to be honest it was bad idea. Arenet are bad on knowledge their mistake so I wouldn’t count on druid change next. I really hope arenet will give us different developer becuse in my opinion ireno killed the class
-
F**** you arenet
-
Druid as a whole needrework
-
For me i just dont want ireno to becin charge forcthe next e spec. I dont think the person who gave us druid and soulbeast is able to produce elite spec thar will be good. Honestly both are trash , there skills , traits and what the spec is about its just garbage, i hate what has done to my favorite class
-
druid = garbege
-
hello , ihave to say iwas glad to hear new expac is coming but as for my main ranger icant say that. base on both elite soulbeast and druid in my opinion this is going to be very bad for us,. yeha for sure they will give us something boring but effective at first and then nerf. im sorry but both druid and sn lack of creativity and to be honst very stale comper to the rest of the class. ranger is my main and im stick to it ( mostrly play core ) but im scared that evrey expac the gap betwen ranger and others wil increse , before attacking me i want to emphasize that im not talking about the effectivenes but on the gamplay and cosmatic. dont get me worng i think ireno is great developer but ithink its time for a change in the ranger section,
-
> @"Sobx.1758" said:
> > @"kiritsugu emeya.3962" said:
> > > @"voltaicbore.8012" said:
> > > > @"kiritsugu emeya.3962" said:
> > > >did they mess with any other gs skills that I'm not aware of?
> > >
> > > Yes - they took the evade out of the end of the GS autoattack chain, which messed up a lot of folks who came to depend on it as part of a good melee rotation. Instead of giving an evade frame, the final attack in the chain gives back some endurance. It still takes forever and a day to channel the whole final attack.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > WAIT WHAT!! Who in the hell in the balancing team thought it was a good idea to remove the evade frame???
> > Devs do me a favor and play ur kitten game, you dont play it therefore you dont understand it.
>
> meh, pretty sure they understood how the evade chain was abused. Is that really the point you're trying to make? That they ""didn't understand"" people gained 3 x the intended evade?
>
> >I still can't believe that they labeled the nerf as a RANDOM DODGE. this alone brings up many questions, is the current balance team working in anet or did they get them from another mmo? it was literally implemented in the game 7 years ago... do you guys know what skills you're creating in each class?
>
> You use it out of context btw. Nobody ever said the dodge randomly found its way into the game, tbh I'm not sure what you're talking about here.
lol i laugh so loud when you saud abuse the evade . man just move from the ranger forum if your such an hater comon people need to be real for once sake
-
> @"VAHNeunzehnsechundsiebzig.3618" said:
> fix rangers? easy: half their damage. done.
lol hater go to your mesmer \ thief forum noob. ranger dps is lame...
[Video : WvW Roaming] What kind of build do you think is OP?
in Ranger
Posted
> @"anduriell.6280" said:
> > @"bigo.9037" said:
> > axe is not overtuned. it has very little capability of defense and deals less dmg than longbow and gs.
> >
>
> Axe reachs 4k autos in a tanky build and Winter’s bite deals as much damage as the maul ins a AoE at 900 range with chilled and weakness. Split blade can delete glass builds if you hit with the 5 blades.
>
> It is a overtunned, it needs the might removed from the autos and the Winter’s bite an slower projectile and more visible.
>
> That single weapon alone carries tanky ranger builds.
lol 4 k auto ? tanky build ? comon man that fake news