Oh My God.8423

Understood. Thanks!!

I have played both equally in the past week doing similar activities. I feel that FB can burst down with more stacks of burning quicker. Weaver takes a bit more time to ramp up the stacks of burning/bleeding. Whereas I found that Weaver a bit more survivable where I can always stay in melee range without much major issues. The rotation of FB is so much simpler to the point of almost non-existence. But Weaver is really not that complicated either - it flows once you get started. FB can double up for support; Weaver has to switch to Tempest. I am still deciding which one I want to focus on more...

> @"AliamRationem.5172" said: > > @"Oh My God.8423" said: > > I just came back to GW2 a few weeks ago and have not been playing much on my Ele. I do like your build, Aliam but I have no experience with Sword - I do familiar with Dagger. Would Dagger/Dagger work with your build too? > > > > Thanks! > > I don't really know. I played dagger tempest awhile back, but I've never really given dagger weaver a chance. I picked it up with sword this year and it feels pretty comfortable to me! My sense is that d/d is better as a power set, but with condi utilities + dual attacks you can probably manage decent condition damage regardless. Thanks! Did not realise Sword is a condi weapon...

I just came back to GW2 a few weeks ago and have not been playing much on my Ele. I do like your build, Aliam but I have no experience with Sword - I do familiar with Dagger. Would Dagger/Dagger work with your build too? Thanks!