lare.5129

make yours uniq biuld, NOT meta. Set runes, amulet as you want, but not how to suggest meta.

After some loses you will drop in low silver/bronze. Here more fun, less bots.

I now use condi spellbreaker with swords, get fun and less bots compared whit gold

or play unranked .. on unranked people - but to strong for me.

> @"Infusion.7149" said:

I don't believe in turbo-boost, but I believe in overheat agter 1h, cpu throttling, and big electricity consuming

I don't say that mac m1 is best pc in word. I say that is can be in current world.

> @"Asgaeroth.6427" said:

> Could you rephrase that? I have no idea what you are trying to say.

some time ago I buy new x86-64 laptop with itel cpu and geforce 2060. Now on aprox half of this price I can buy macbook air.

And how I say **if** I set native rendering and same graphics options I have same fps as in m1 in Parallel

> @"Asgaeroth.6427" said:

> You can buy an equivalently spec'd general purpose x86-64 machine brand new for your used Mac price.

? what ? my x86-64 machine was buy for price that price for **2** new air mac. No matter purpose. Performance - this is target.

> @"Infusion.7149" said:

> Except anyone that is unbiased will not say it is "great performance".

for me it great. Currently on 2060 if preset same I get less.

> @"Gyro.9182" said:

> As it is, **all** Mac users are to some extend "mad at Anet"

oh, no, we already know that it great works on m1 whit windows version

> @"Sobx.1758" said:

yes, people ask why it is great, and I explain that

https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/comment/1401632#Comment_1401629

> @"Sobx.1758" said:

> In this vid you keep constantly dropping below 15-20 fps

it is great result. Look at resolution: 3440*1440 ! it is not 1980*1024!

Set same setting on 2060 with 4-x fattest notebook design and you will see same or less fps as me.

> @"Linken.6345" said:

> Aint the 32 bit client discontinued?

no. It is able to download as always.

> @"ASP.8093" said:

> Any specific reason you picked the 32-bit client?

it is not me. I only research how it is gone, because have plans buy mac.

looks mac users can not panic absolutely

Parallels Technical Preview + Windows 10 Arm Preview Virtualisation + 32bit Guild Wars 2 + 1440p UltraWide resolution + **Max** Settings Preset to Appearance.

I have less fps on new geforce wiht that resolution's and settings ..looks great on m1 !

at first, any abusive thing in pvp - is part of pvp balance. So if you see burn guard - RUN! Don't try kill that solo. It is pvp, but not low lv pve where u can press 1 and get success.

So after that you need check, if have 2 member if possible kill burn guard. If no - run too.

If 3 members do it -is may be possible and u will get luck.

As for me this i ok, that some class is good balanced, and make some fun for people.

already on top100 ? or top25 ? no? why? if everyone around so bad ??

may it translation issues, half word not have easy translation for me in topic.

!!!! extra news:

Guild Wars 2 Running on M1 MacBook Air Using Parallels Windows 10 ARM

looks it have great performance. It I set on my new GeForce same settings I have less fps ..

hope someone make video where probably spain/argentina person very laugh ad say story about gw2 and mac support. And unhappy mac players will get some smile and positive.

> @"Master Ketsu.4569" said:

> Can't Apple use Wine?

it can only on OLD Apple that already was normal native working client. You cant run wine on m1. The virtualization is obsolete on new cpu.

> My laptop is running Kubu linux and can run GW2 with wine at about 50 fps which isn't the best but it's not bad. Vulkan drivers help.

we happy that you run linux+wine and gw2

> @"Gyro.9182" said:

> Repeating myself, if there are reasons (lack of money, the lead Mac developer is leaving Anet, ...) that prevent Anet from supporting the current client, I would understand that (thought I would, of course, still not be happy about it).

can it be some pressure from powerful x64 fans in some management or side government?

> Apple's new chipset

magic that it drop support form all line, not only m1.

> @"Cyninja.2954" said:

> What does this suggestion have to do with the lore and possible reasoning behind why raids are harder in comparison to say story missions?

it make raid valid content some time, and people can hold vision on it and extent in in any direction.

> Again, this topic deals with how it can be explained lore wise.

author say that impossible touch that content as lore, and feel it. So it is my vision ho to make it accelerate for lore players.

> @"Sobx.1758" said:

>So instead of saying in these threads whatever you're trying to constantly say (which basically boils down to "*mac will make pcs irrelevant*" -LOL)

will make? no, I don't say that. That it WAS.

> maybe tell the complainers to make educated choices and then live with them instead of misplacing blame on anet

I am not blame. I am say that it very SAD.

>while still supporting apple's practices by just buying new stuff as a response.

it is good stuff. Not best,, but is big payable market.

> @"Sobx.1758" said:

> True. So you should stop crying about it when you're so eager to support these great practices. What's your problem here?

there is no any problem if u not worry will be alive gw2

> @"dandamanno.4136" said:

> Apple doesn't care that you want to use their machines for gaming. That is clear by their actions.

so why they produce api metal ? And why mane games already declare support .. 14800 applications already support this ..

> @"Veprovina.4876" said:

> I'm sure everything you said is very helpful to people who can't play Guild Wars 2 anymore because of Apple's changes.

today apply, but as for me soon arm on desctop cam be more mainstream. And not support that - don't look in future.

> +1 for comparing a multi million dollar company like Blizzard with 100x more staff than Anet.

100x? joke? If you want compare all sum partu you need make Activision Blizzard(wow department) vs NCSOFT (where anet is sub part)

An we see revenue $6.489 billion vs$ 1.543 billion. Yes, we have difference, 4.3, but not 100x ...

> @"Linken.6345" said:

> and scale squad size down to 5=50% and 7=75% then to compensate?

no, there is no any point scale size. Same 10 persons.

by this idea we can have raid event whit 50%-75% less boss hp in all modes .. (I still can;t complete some CM from start)

And scroll that event all year.

nerved wing 1 - two week, some break, 2 weeks break, nerfed wing 2 - 2 weeeks .. break 2 weeks . .wing 3 .. break wing 8 .. break wing 1 ..

https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/PvP_Seasons

that board looks strange ..

k, so someone not make League Slayer—Conquest Season Twenty-One , may be ill or work .. or have another things .. And that person see ? empty line? or ir hidden btw?

Can person replay that season to complete ? no ?

so we have historical continuous board?

it smell like monthly spvp season achiv's from 2012

hope it will be updated to more valid form, where people can complete it anyway in our crysis world

this is looks line lines rows is completed diamond/gold chest from wvw each week or not . if it in achiv .. very strange

> @"StarSilverZero.5673" said:

> After Anet announced about Updated on Mac Support for GW2 broke my heart.

> It pretty sad for me but I understand. Curse you apple! Literally.

big train go forward. Is some passengers don't ready and don't motivate go on board - this is not train issue.