Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Vavume.8065

Members
  • Posts

    1,370
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Vavume.8065

  1. > @"Shiyo.3578" said: > "I only want to play with the cool kids" is why raids were abandoned by the developers. Hands down best quote of the whole thread.
  2. > @"Ayrilana.1396" said: > Another thing that I noticed is that you need 30 of those prismaticite crystals per weapon. At around 20 min on average, and only getting one per mission, this means it’ll take 10 hours for one weapon and 150 hours for the rest. The recipe achievement gives you enough material for one weapon. No problem, now I have a use for my 53 bags of Icebrood Saga Materials
  3. > @"Randulf.7614" said: > The biggest issue seems to me that the instances do not appear to scale which means group based story content. I solo'ed one and then I did the rest in groups, the bosses seemed to take longer in groups so I think the bosses scale at least, could be wrong though.
  4. > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > > > > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > > > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > > > > > > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > > > > > > > > > @"Vayne.8563" said: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This game as never focused on PvP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They focused on it pretty hard when they did the $250.000 tournament. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not a development focus ... and that is what is being discussed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am aware of what is being discussed... and my point stands. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No it doesn't because we are talking about game development focus ... and your point is about marketing focus. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it is not just about development focus, it is also about focus in general. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That doesn't make sense. The comment you were referring to is about how the game is developed. Nothing else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you had read the quote I quoted that referred to FOCUS on PvP then maybe it would have made sense to you.... > > > > > > > > > > I did read ... I also read the rest of the thread. It's clear that the poster you were replying to was talking about game development and not marketing. > > > > > > > > It was clear he was talking about focus... > > > > > > Yup ... Game development focus on PVE vs. PVP, not marketing. I suggest the next time you don't just chop a single sentence from people's posts to make irrelevant statements. > > > > I suggest you report my post then since you seem to have such an issue with it. > > I don't think that's necessary ... just some correction was in order to make sure there is no misunderstanding or confusion. You have not corrected me.
  5. > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > > > > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > > > > > > > @"Vayne.8563" said: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This game as never focused on PvP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They focused on it pretty hard when they did the $250.000 tournament. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not a development focus ... and that is what is being discussed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am aware of what is being discussed... and my point stands. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No it doesn't because we are talking about game development focus ... and your point is about marketing focus. > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it is not just about development focus, it is also about focus in general. > > > > > > > > > > That doesn't make sense. The comment you were referring to is about how the game is developed. Nothing else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you had read the quote I quoted that referred to FOCUS on PvP then maybe it would have made sense to you.... > > > > > > I did read ... I also read the rest of the thread. It's clear that the poster you were replying to was talking about game development and not marketing. > > > > It was clear he was talking about focus... > > Yup ... Game development focus on PVE vs. PVP, not marketing. I suggest the next time you don't just chop a single sentence from people's posts to make irrelevant statements. I suggest you report my post then since you seem to have such an issue with it.
  6. > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > > > @"Vayne.8563" said: > > > > > > > > > This game as never focused on PvP. > > > > > > > > They focused on it pretty hard when they did the $250.000 tournament. > > > > > > That's not a development focus ... and that is what is being discussed. > > > > I am aware of what is being discussed... and my point stands. > > No it doesn't because we are talking about game development focus ... and your point is about marketing focus. No, it is not just about development focus, it is also about focus in general.
  7. > @"Obtena.7952" said: > > @"Vavume.8065" said: > > > @"Vayne.8563" said: > > > > > This game as never focused on PvP. > > > > They focused on it pretty hard when they did the $250.000 tournament. > > That's not a development focus ... and that is what is being discussed. I am aware of what is being discussed... and my point stands.
  8. Thankfully I don't have this problem but yeah I agree that should not be a thing.
  9. Same, it says ready your allies, but who? the guys around the table? the faction vendors? nothing works.
  10. > @"Infusion.7149" said: > It's kind of late for this complaint. Not at all, we are about to have another set of them in a different color. I think the easiest solution is just increase the drop of draconic lodestones.
  11. > @"Vayne.8563" said: > This game as never focused on PvP. They focused on it pretty hard when they did the $250.000 tournament.
  12. I like the Jackal most but probably use the Skycale more, although I find the skyscale is very clunky to use and really feels like a poorly made flying mount
  13. > @"firedragon.8953" said: > I'd even be happy for some brain dead "account wide bonus" such as 10% increase to gathering speed, 5% increase in gold, etc. etc. Same, I have a lot of spare mastery points and would be nice to have a use for them, I would like to have a crafting mastery that speeds up refining and crafting, to the speed of crafting lucks, also I would love a racial armor mastery, where you can then wear other races cultural armor.
  14. > @"Saga.4102" said: > So now when we start to get back-skins that can be dyed, can't you look over the legendary backpacks also and make them dyeable? Add legendary weapons to that.
  15. I would like to see more infusions that have aura's rather than infusions that change your skin.
  16. > @"kharmin.7683" said: > Having a mobile app would deter people from actually logging in to the game. I'm not sure Anet would want that. Why would it? you think people only log in to check the gem store? I'm pretty sure the majority of players log in for many other reasons.
  17. > @"Loosmaster.8263" said: > In a perfect world, your own fields should have priority... 100% this, please rework.
  18. Personally I don't really care one way or the other. > @"lokh.2695" said: > I would like the 36k/42k AP backpieces to have gliders. It's 39k/42k AP. > @"Raknar.4735" said: > Na, I think resources are better spent elsewhere. I see what you did there :)
  19. I don't think I've seen a poll be so one sided on these forums before, hopefully Arenanet are taking notes.
  20. For me a good map has a meta cycle that splits the players up and has good rewards, Silverwastes is still the map I consider closest to perfect, mainly due to the way it spreads players around the map rather than having them zerg. Southern Drizzlewood is also good with the 2 lanes strategy, and has good rewards, but it's still a little to zergy for my liking. I would rather have a new map with 3 or more lanes where fights become more personal instead of faceroll zerging.
  21. Updates to WvW and PvP should be either packaged with expansions or free during content patches.
  22. Yes do it, and add every single gem store item into it, so that I can buy anything at anytime, I cannot stand the stock rotation thing, and yeah, yeah, I know why they do it.
  23. > @"august.8016" said: > > There is no need for any reward, even just compliments are enough > What do you think? I don't play for compliments.
  24. > @"Vayne.8563" said: > Number of people doing Living World Meta Achievements is Declining > According to GW2 Efficiency, the percentage of people who have completed zone meta achievements are trending down. Doing and completed, 2 different things...
  25. > @"lare.5129" said: >plus each day after some update I buy 2 m-clover from fractal vendor. Which requires mystic coins...
×
×
  • Create New...