ZarexWolf.5637

Honestly, I'd love that, but I'm not sure if Anet could do it knowing how some companies can be. Regardless, it'd be nice to have this added after so long. (Especially since other games that have censoring issues that still allow male characters to have their chest showing that also have the same rating by ESRB.)

> @"Kodama.6453" said: > > @"ZarexWolf.5637" said: > > > @"Kodama.6453" said: > > > > @"Lan Deathrider.5910" said: > > > > > @"Kodama.6453" said: > > > > > > @"Dadnir.5038" said: > > > > > > > > > > > > To be honest, I don't think togo had enough of an impact to become a legend. As a GW1 player I'd be very tempted to but that's all. > > > > > > > > > > > > From my point of view, the next revenant e-spec's legend won't be another human legend. I think a prime candidate for an e-spec would be "Nightmare" with Kanaxai as a legendary Nightmare (which is listed both as a demon and a nightmare). I'd model the e-spec after the mesmer with an inbuilt (Upkeep F skill) way to create a nightmare (clone) based on your current legend that harass your target and/or support your allies. It's skills could be _aspects_ (there is 16 of them to chose from in Kanaxai's instance so there is enough material for ANet to make something) working similarly to Herald's facet but as debuff instead of buff (or each of these skills creating a nightmare with an upkeep). Weapon being Off-hand axe because "kanaxai's flavor". > > > > > > > > > > > > If I let my fantasy lead me I'd even say that the dreamy aspect of EoD teaser support my claim ;) > > > > > > > > > > What I don't understand is why people are always saying that the next legend won't be a human _again_ as if there would be an overrepresentation of humans in revenants legends. > > > > > > > > > > There is just 1 human legend for revenant, Shiro. All the other legends are not human. > > > > > * Ventari -> Centaur > > > > > * Mallyx -> Demon > > > > > * Jalis -> Dwarf > > > > > * Glint -> Dragon > > > > > * Kalla -> Charr > > > > > > > > > > So I think a human legend is still very well possible. > > > > > > > > Ventari would also be Sylvari. They haven't been around long enough for one of their own to really become legendary enough. No Treesus please. > > > > > > > > There are not Asuran legends nor are there any Norn legends. The new Rev espec should be one of those. > > > > > > There is an exception when it comes to Sylvari. > > > I don't think you can deny that Scarlet had a major impact on the world and should be up there in the legendary tier, even if these have been fairly recent events. > > > > > > Still disagree that Norn or Asura should be the legend and also disagree with a Sylvari one (aka Scarlet) because of the point I mentioned: I think it would be a waste to not give us a Canthan legend for that expansion. > > > > I mean, it is a waste to not have Scarlet become a legendary stance. Not to mention she'd be perfect for those that want more range options with rev, but I do understand that there are those that also want more melee options. (Seriously, Rev needs a larger weapon selection.) For melee, I think Talon would be a good choice if Anet expands their lore. > > Scarlet definitely is one of the big players in the lore, hence why I mentioned her. > But I just mentioned Scarlet for the sake of acknowledging her. I think she is not a good choice for the next elite spec (or any coming future elite spec, really). > > There are some points which speak against Scarlet. > She wouldn't enhance the lore alot, unlike other legends. We discovered alot about Scarlet's past already when we dealt with her. > Also her thematic: Scarlet basically has been a holosmith herself. Holosmith even referrences one of her iconic abilities in their ultimates, the prime light beam. > In general, holograms and hard light have been defining for her as a character. Sure, there have been mechanical creatures created by her. But Scarlet herself mostly attacked with lasers and such. > > Which makes her too close thematically to holosmith to happen in my opinion. > I love Scarlet, was one of my favourite characters in this game and she really is worthy of the title of a legend. > But looking at what it would mean for an elite spec, I think it is better not to use her as a revenant elite spec. Yeah, that makes sense and I know we already got a Charr for one stance, but I'm curious to see if we'll get another like Bonfaaz Burntfur or Olma. We do know little about her and the Olmakhan compared to others, but I'm sure there are those that will disagree.

> @"Kodama.6453" said: > > @"Lan Deathrider.5910" said: > > > @"Kodama.6453" said: > > > > @"Dadnir.5038" said: > > > > > > > > To be honest, I don't think togo had enough of an impact to become a legend. As a GW1 player I'd be very tempted to but that's all. > > > > > > > > From my point of view, the next revenant e-spec's legend won't be another human legend. I think a prime candidate for an e-spec would be "Nightmare" with Kanaxai as a legendary Nightmare (which is listed both as a demon and a nightmare). I'd model the e-spec after the mesmer with an inbuilt (Upkeep F skill) way to create a nightmare (clone) based on your current legend that harass your target and/or support your allies. It's skills could be _aspects_ (there is 16 of them to chose from in Kanaxai's instance so there is enough material for ANet to make something) working similarly to Herald's facet but as debuff instead of buff (or each of these skills creating a nightmare with an upkeep). Weapon being Off-hand axe because "kanaxai's flavor". > > > > > > > > If I let my fantasy lead me I'd even say that the dreamy aspect of EoD teaser support my claim ;) > > > > > > What I don't understand is why people are always saying that the next legend won't be a human _again_ as if there would be an overrepresentation of humans in revenants legends. > > > > > > There is just 1 human legend for revenant, Shiro. All the other legends are not human. > > > * Ventari -> Centaur > > > * Mallyx -> Demon > > > * Jalis -> Dwarf > > > * Glint -> Dragon > > > * Kalla -> Charr > > > > > > So I think a human legend is still very well possible. > > > > Ventari would also be Sylvari. They haven't been around long enough for one of their own to really become legendary enough. No Treesus please. > > > > There are not Asuran legends nor are there any Norn legends. The new Rev espec should be one of those. > > There is an exception when it comes to Sylvari. > I don't think you can deny that Scarlet had a major impact on the world and should be up there in the legendary tier, even if these have been fairly recent events. > > Still disagree that Norn or Asura should be the legend and also disagree with a Sylvari one (aka Scarlet) because of the point I mentioned: I think it would be a waste to not give us a Canthan legend for that expansion. I mean, it is a waste to not have Scarlet become a legendary stance. Not to mention she'd be perfect for those that want more range options with rev, but I do understand that there are those that also want more melee options. (Seriously, Rev needs a larger weapon selection.) For melee, I think Talon would be a good choice if Anet expands their lore.

So, I just had a thought, maybe Revenant could get the Legendary Prisoner stance that was used for a certain part of the story, if that's still possible. Not sure what weapons could be chosen, but it'd definitely be interesting. Though, I prefer Scarlet over Joko in all honesty, which could tie into the use of rifles like I mentioned earlier. Sorry if I've been all over the place with this post.

> @"Kodama.6453" said: > I do the same, using a condition build that uses elixirs to get buffs. Also am wearing the gasmask skin from LS1 as well as the injector backpack you are using, haha. > I really like the chemical aspects of the engineer class, yet there is no elite spec to showcase it really. I would love to see that changed and play as a chemical maniac in endgame content and be viable with it! > Well, all we can do now is hope Anet listens to this and hopefully get this added, could be reconstructed for something else, but as long as we keep the alchemy part, we'll be happy, right? (Though in hindsight, it may become a full on support elite for elixirs to be honest.)

> @"Kodama.6453" said: > I am biased towards the plaguedoctor, since alchemy is my favourite thematic from the engineer. Also Anet removed alot of chemical warfare when it comes to thematics from the engineer over the years. > > The alchemy trait line used to be about aggressive usage of chemicals just as well as the supportive nature of it. Acid coating, acidic elixirs, deathly mixture, etc. All this stuff got removed to reshape alchemy as a purely supportive trait line in the end. > I would like these thematics to return and an alchemy based elite spec would be the best way to achieve this. > > Also it would fill an interesting thematical niche for the engineer elite specs in my opinion. The hightech and mechanical aspects of their thematics are already covered thanks to scrapper and holosmith. Having the chemical aspects of the class represented in an elite spec would be great in my opinion to give some thematical variety between the specs. > > A sapper wouldn't really achieve that in my opinion, it would just be another spec that builds stuff with most likely a mechanical design, just like the scrapper. Hell, even the names are kitten close, just a cr is differentiating sapper from scrapper, lmao. > > And the part about environmental scars... I think this works perfectly fine for Cantha. Cantha wasn't just Shing Jea, Kurzick and Luxon. A huge part of the map back then has been Kaineng, which already in times of GW1 has been a huge city with overpopulation, slums, and other social problems. I can imagine that Kaineng has grown over the years and became a very "steampunky" and polluted city, tbh. Honestly, I can see plague doctor being a thing for Engineer. Alchemy did take a dive in fairness, but maybe Plague Doctor can rectify that? Also curious if the image used for it will display another Charr or an Asura this time.

> @"Kodama.6453" said: > @"Dadnir.5038" > > He wrote "Anyways, I'm curious to hear what everyone else can come up with and if they got better ideas than what I got for Revenant." I think this thread here is intended by him to invite all players to share their ideas for elite specs for all classes, even if he just provided an example for revenant himself. > > @"Dadnir.5038" said: > Shouldn't this be in the revenant's subforum? > I don't mind revenant getting pistol or rifle on it's 3rd elite but does the pistol or rifle need to be ranged? > > NB.: The title of the thread is to broad, it should probably be: "weapon idea for revenant's 3rd elite". Yeah, I just drummed up what could be for Revenant, but couldn't think of what else could be done for the other classes. Sorry for it being so broad though.

I'm not that great with coming up with ideas, but I was thinking Revenant could have either a pistol or rifle, just another range weapon since in the instance for pistol and rifle, we have one core range which is the hammer and for Renegade, it does make up for that, however, it focuses on conditions instead of pure raw damage, with the exception for Soulcleave's Summit. Also, I feel like it could focus on dodging, which the hammer doesn't really help, even if we want to attack our foes from afar. Anyways, I'm curious to hear what everyone else can come up with and if they got better ideas than what I got for Revenant.

> @"akorn.9578" said: > *salute* > "Afternoon, soldier. Name's Akorn, Imperator of the Imperial Charr Legion. I hear you're looking for a warband? I can tell you, there's none better than those in the Imperial Legion. > Okay, by none better I mean there are none better to be in. I'm sure there are a few who could beat our tails...but look, that's not what we're about. We're not trying to be the best. We're trying to have fun. > But, er, don't tell the Khan-Ur I said that . . . ." > > Hiya! The Imperial Charr Legion is a charr-only RP guild made up of new and old players. We're just getting started building up. Our leaders are old vets (like myself, been here 8 years now!) who love the game but aren't hard-core end-gamers. We would LOVE to help you get up to speed. I personally just finished getting my skyscale and would be thrilled to help some other players get it too! > > Here are our in-game contacts: > Contact guild imperator(second-in-command) (kybizen.1723) or our Khan-ur(guild leader) (nobledeth.2310) in-game, or reply to this message, and we will get back to you asap. Thanks, I'll take this into consideration.> @"Vayne.8563" said: > Your guild doesn't have to be in Darkhaven. Servers are only for WvW and nothing else. There are two server parks, EU and US. Whichever server you're on that's the guild you'll need to join, unless you plan on getting heavily into WvW. > > Otherwise my guild sounds like it would fit you quite nicely. We're a US server based pre launch guild that's both casual and helpful and we're very good about helping people catch up. Particularly if they don't mind jumping into discord. Ah, gotcha and thanks, I'll contact you if I can.