Jerry CCH.9816 Posted December 3, 2017 Share Posted December 3, 2017 This good idea for Anet B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blodeuyn.2751 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 If you are suggesting that you can transfer to a full, thus CLOSED, server, then no, it is not a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry CCH.9816 Posted December 4, 2017 Author Share Posted December 4, 2017 > @Blodeuyn.2751 said: > If you are suggesting that you can transfer to a full, thus CLOSED, server, then no, it is not a good idea. sure. i want set alt at JQ :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apharma.3741 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 I think 5000 is peanuts, make it 20,000 so only BG can afford it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDchiaScrub.3241 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 No. Make it RNG where it randomly selects 1 of the servers with no duplicates. So you could eventually get there after spending more and more on the chance to get to BG. When you have all 30 you can stop. Wait what was the OP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 ANet closes servers to allow other worlds to catch p in terms of participation. Opening them for any reason, even extra cash, undermines the very purpose of closing them in first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swamurabi.7890 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Yes, then each transfer lowers the map cap of said server by 1-5 players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodOfDeath.5247 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 > @apharma.3741 said: > I think 5000 is peanuts, make it 20,000 so only BG can afford it. I'm with this guy anet, increase the gem cost. For once, we want you to charge more. DO IT, don't be scared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eremes Guile.1480 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Dont do it anet. Just focus on pve and gem store stuffs. That's the money is at anet! Luls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero.3871 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 full means full. no way to join a FULL server! is that so hard to understand?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Pj.2193 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 > @Zero.3871 said: > full means full. no way to join a FULL server! is that so hard to understand?!?! Unless you get your full server to not play for a while. Then it may open. Figure that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joneirikb.7506 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Counter Argument: If they do allow people to transfer to closer servers, what would happen ? Imagine if every bandwagoner in the game has saved up gold or real life cash, and guy gems and transfers off to BG. Their total population would increase further, but still have the same Queue limits (roughly 80 per map for 4 maps + OS). How long would it take for guilds to realize it would be near impossible to get your guild into the same map at NA prime time, with Queue's closing in on 3 digits. You'd very likely shatter the community strength they have, simply because it would be near impossible to organize even the most organized server, when you have 500 bandwagoners in queue, shutting out the guilds and the old BG hands. So, make medium servers free to transfer to, and BG just might de-stack itself. Simply because it's either that or play Queue-Wars. And the reason I think ANet would never actually do this, is because it would destroy one of the largest communities in the game. (It would also make whatever side BG was on in EOTM absolutely retardedly overpowered for who knows how long) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarCayne.3098 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 > @"Illconceived Was Na.9781" said: > ANet closes servers to allow other worlds to catch p in terms of participation. Opening them for any reason, even extra cash, undermines the very purpose of closing them in first place. And yet sadly they did that repeatedly in 2016 and 2017. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 the goal is to have 24/7 coverage. you cant get this by closing servers. :astonished: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarCayne.3098 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 > @Sovereign.1093 said: > the goal is to have 24/7 coverage. you cant get this by closing servers. :astonished: > That's the player's goals. Anet never ever even suggested this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inoki.6048 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 No, definitely not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesdolla.3954 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 I have a better suggestion. Just open Blackgate. I wanna play with my friends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonNeonite.1048 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Don't give them ideas. 5400 gems is crazy and they wouldn't even charge that much, it would be 2000 gems like that latest mount skin. If they thought it was a good idea, it's not, they just need to get some proper devs in WvW instead of relying on a flawed algorithm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malerian.8435 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 It is already fairly spendy. Like if you want to go to a very high populated server it is 1800 gems at. That is roughly 430-540 gold depending on the exchange rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeSystm.1256 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Make it 6k gems. I wanna see what people will pay to run yaks for the last year of wvw. Also make linked servers free. I want absolute carnage in population too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xDudisx.5914 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Make it free for the lowest 3 servers. Make an auction for the top ones. For example 10 slots for BG per month. Who are willing to pay the most win those spots. Starting bid 10k gems. Create one extra tier, T5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirlias.8104 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Reducing the number of servers would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xDudisx.5914 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 > @Shirlias.8104 said: > Reducing the number of servers would be great. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Choppy.4183 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 > @Swamurabi.7890 said: > Yes, then each transfer lowers the map cap of said server by 1-5 players. The hilarity of BG suddenly swamped by people desperate to overstack, only to find they get queues after they have a dozen people on the map, and then having those same people flock to different servers, might break the internet. On the plus side, it might fully fund gw3. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry CCH.9816 Posted December 5, 2017 Author Share Posted December 5, 2017 2017 Q4 Pressure :s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now