Shirlias.8104 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 The springer is really cool. Also the cold breath effect is nice. Also really happy that you continue to mantain the base models instead of put different beasts on our mounts. Thank \o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadenheadr.5604 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 I kinda wish the griffon skin was of the plush griffon. Seems like a missed opportunity here.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosknight.3041 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Wish they would let us buy individual skins from the bundle, instead of constantly shoe horning mount skins at 2k gems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Witch of Doom.5739 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 > @"crosknight.3041" said: > Wish they would let us buy individual skins from the bundle, instead of constantly shoe horning mount skins at 2k gems Yes, I would buy one from the bundle, since I probably wouldn't use them much outside of winter. They're all cool, but I bought the Spooky Day bundle (no regrets, I like them) and can't spring for 1600 gems on another bundle now. That's OK, and I hope people who get this new bundle like it. I truly do look forward to seeing the mounts in the world. But pleasepleaseplease, ANet, more individual mount skins! And I mean at 400-700 gems each, not 2000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 > @"Witch of Doom.5739" said: > > @"crosknight.3041" said: > > Wish they would let us buy individual skins from the bundle, instead of constantly shoe horning mount skins at 2k gems > > Yes, I would buy one from the bundle, since I probably wouldn't use them much outside of winter. Same. I would have bought 2, maybe 3 spookies. And 2 (maybe 3) cozies. But 1600 for 2-3 skins I don't want? Nope. **** As I've said many times, ANet goofed in setting my expectations about mountfit prices: outfits are ~700 gems typically, the first mountfit pack was 400/skin retail. We had every reason to believe that individual mount skins would be priced similarly. It's going to take a long, long time before I could consider spending 2k gems for a single mountfit, no matter how nice or 1600 gems for a bundle that includes more than 1 skin I don't want at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirlias.8104 Posted December 12, 2017 Author Share Posted December 12, 2017 Well, in your case 2 mounts are 1400 gems ( 700 each ) so a 1600 bundle could be worth it. I will definitely buy it because all mounts have a hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danikat.8537 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 I wish there was a way to take all those silly clothes off of them and disable the snow effect. There's some lovely wintery themed mounts here, but then they've got all these silly extras tacked on and IMO the end result just looks a mess. If I could remove all that I'd buy them in a second but as it is it looks like I'm going to be waiting _another_ month, at least, to buy some mount skins. (Weirdly they remind me of a teddy bear I was given when I was 3. I was told he was a special Christmas teddy (he was, Harrods 1988 Christmas Bear) and had to keep his special hat and scarf. So I did keep them. For 29 years I've kept the bear - on my bed, then on the box at the bottom of my bed, and the hat and scarf - in a cupboard in a separate room. I can't remember the last time he wore them.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haleydawn.3764 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 I had high hopes for this mount pack to be plushy-fied versions of the mounts. Sadly I won’t purchase these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inubasiri.8745 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 MO never learns... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirlias.8104 Posted December 12, 2017 Author Share Posted December 12, 2017 Many did complain about the rng licence and accepted the spooky bundle. This time everybody should be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taelac.7036 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 These are cute, and I'm good with the price for the bundle. If I get some gems for the holidays, I'll likely pick them up. It would have been definite if they had been simply ice-and-snow themed as opposed to the (admittedly adorable) hats-and-tinsel-and-mittens. Fun, reasonably priced, solid maybe from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JVJD.4912 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 > @"Witch of Doom.5739" said: > > @"crosknight.3041" said: > > Wish they would let us buy individual skins from the bundle, instead of constantly shoe horning mount skins at 2k gems > > Yes, I would buy one from the bundle, since I probably wouldn't use them much outside of winter. They're all cool, but I bought the Spooky Day bundle (no regrets, I like them) and can't spring for 1600 gems on another bundle now. That's OK, and I hope people who get this new bundle like it. I truly do look forward to seeing the mounts in the world. But pleasepleaseplease, ANet, more individual mount skins! And I mean at 400-700 gems each, not 2000. Ill probably be using the raptor all year long, i might change the dyes a bit after winter is over But come on its a raptor in a hat with a pretty bow at the back :+1: that and the gryphon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menadena.7482 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 > @"Shirlias.8104" said: > Many did complain about the rng licence and accepted the spooky bundle. > This time everybody should be happy. The bundle came out before the rng lootbox so not a valid comparison. All we had were the base skins as a source of comparison and the spooky skins gave us more channels at least. No, we are not happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirlias.8104 Posted December 12, 2017 Author Share Posted December 12, 2017 > @"Menadena.7482" said: > > @"Shirlias.8104" said: > > Many did complain about the rng licence and accepted the spooky bundle. > > This time everybody should be happy. > > The bundle came out before the rng lootbox so not a valid comparison. All we had were the base skins as a source of comparison and the spooky skins gave us more channels at least. No, we are not happy. You are not happy, and i do pretty understand. But many said that they were ok with the spooky bundle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge shot Grif.6450 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Really disheartening to see such opportunity with mount skins being wasted... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now