Why not make WvW a megaserver like the rest of the game?

[SugarCayne.3098]

> @"ReaverKane.7598" said:

> > @"Norbe.7630" said:

> > PvE is Fashion Wars 2

> > pls dun make WvW a Faction Wars too :/

>

> It already is?

>

> > @"SugarCayne.3098" said:

> > > @"ReaverKane.7598" said:

> > > EoTM doesn't work because it's estranged from the rest of the game mode, its not integral to it, and the map itself sux. That's the problem with EoTM.

> >

> > So if Anet took devs away from working on WvW and created a new EoTM map you'd be happy and not want to make WvW into another EoTM?

> >

> > Ok that clears things up.

> >

> Did i say that? Actually never have i mentioned EoTM before others did. EoTM doesn't work because it's an isolated mechanic that doesn't bring anything to the rest. Having 3 factions with instantiated maps, would. It's not the same thing as Edge of the Mists. And the fact that Edge of the Mists didn't work has no bearing on this suggestion since the similarities start and end with there being factions in it.

>

> > @"Strider Pj.2193" said:

> > > @"SugarCayne.3098" said:

> > > > @"ReaverKane.7598" said:

> > > > EoTM doesn't work because it's estranged from the rest of the game mode, its not integral to it, and the map itself sux. That's the problem with EoTM.

> > >

> > > So if Anet took devs away from working on WvW and created a new EoTM map you'd be happy and not want to make WvW into another EoTM?

> > >

> > > Ok that clears things up.

> > >

> >

> > And of course winning doesn't matter nor does rewards so... It should fix things for them.

>

> 1) Again, didn't say that.

> 2) In the Height of WvW people actually **had to play pve to fund WvW** the rewards were pretty much non-existant, and people still played it. Now that they added rewards, it's arguably much, much worse.

 

People bring up EoTM because you’re describing EoTM.

[ReaverKane.7598]

> @"Hoon.1524" said:

> #serverpride2018

Not anymore :bleep_bloop:

https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/26547/world-restructuring#latest

[Schnitzelweck.7690]

nothing in here

[CETheLucid.3964]

Didn't expect this thread to get too much attention nor for Anet to announce a much better idea. lol

World Restructuring sounds fantastic and it'll let everyone figure out with who and where they want to play without it being the hassle that it is now. Good stuff. Thanks for the feedback everyone.

[folk.8190]

now it is clear why they are doing restructuring https://screenshots.firefox.com/qaZlYUnYwVqhJDUL/www.twitch.tv

[Mogrey.3891]

> @"CETheLucid.3964" said:

> Didn't expect this thread to get too much attention nor for Anet to announce a much better idea. lol

> World Restructuring sounds fantastic and it'll let everyone figure out with who and where they want to play without it being the hassle that it is now. Good stuff. Thanks for the feedback everyone.

 

anet's idea seems more guild-alliance centric. which i pointed out that it could work. what i like most in announcement was that anet didn't just released it and said there you have it. but they informed us months till release asking for feedback etc. that's a good move.

 

@"folk.8190" not really. if anet cared about twitch would spend more time for spvp. and on na timezones gw2 is up to 400~700. still small but it's not the reason for that wvw move. wvw can't provide twitch numbers. is extremely hard to watch so many people fighting. also you may just see streams in your language.