Majic Man.8354 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 yet another week our server is still closed and we are the only server that doesn't get a link. wtf is up with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyShroud.2865 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Indeed, FA is full and they received a link! How is this fair to all other Full predecessor?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadMed.3846 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 You need to tell your 24/7 backcappers crew to take a break. Server will open once you sort that out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djamonja.6453 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 You have won the first 2 skirmishes with a 3.1 KDR, I don't know that you need a link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChronosCosmos.9450 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 > @"Djamonja.6453" said: > You have won the first 2 skirmishes with a 3.1 KDR, I don't know that you need a link. and we only queue 1 map lol, but idc if we open or not. Still fun. Look at all of the other linked servers who have even worst PPT lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonSeed.3528 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 You guys will be fine, don't worry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAN.7314 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 BG runs into tough times for a month. Other 15ish+ servers are like this ALL the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadlySynz.3471 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 BG needs to remain permanently closed. One of my friends is on that server, you have a lot of hibernators at the moment, to the point you'd still outnumber every server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 mmm this is why we need server resets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimator.3589 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Suppose for a moment that the threshold for a server to be full is 2500 players. Server A has 2732 players that got in before it locked. Server Z has 4821 players that successfully overstacked onto it. Both servers are full, but A gets a link while Z does not. Now why do you think that may be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blodeuyn.2751 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Being on a server that is facing BG repeatedly, you do not need a link. You also do not need to be in T3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackarps.1974 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Its amazing how the people on the inside of BG don't realize the grand scheme of things. Transfer servers if you don't like it and take a look at how BG compares to other servers. The same thing happened with JQ not getting a link for so long. When you have dozens of people that no-life karma train for hours a day, it ruins your chances of getting more people to do that with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepwalker.1398 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 > @"Blodeuyn.2751" said: > Being on a server that is facing BG repeatedly, you do not need a link. You also do not need to be in T3. I also don't get why BG is in T3 and SBI in T2, Previous match they finished 2nd in T2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimator.3589 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 > @"Sleepwalker.1398" said: > > @"Blodeuyn.2751" said: > > Being on a server that is facing BG repeatedly, you do not need a link. You also do not need to be in T3. > > I also don't get why BG is in T3 and SBI in T2, > Previous match they finished 2nd in T2. Relink matchups are based on glicko, not 1u1d. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazreal Blackknight.1564 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 But Glicko has us in 4th place so we should have still been t2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimator.3589 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 > @"Mazreal Blackknight.1564" said: > But Glicko has us in 4th place so we should have still been t2 > Not 100% sure, but I think link servers have their own glicko ratings that generally aren't visible on stat sites If so, adding DB to SBI could explain it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 mmm... maybe they have their own wvwstats.com data since they do have control of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaba.5410 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 > @"Mazreal Blackknight.1564" said: > But Glicko has us in 4th place so we should have still been t2 > Yes, the Glicko rank may have been 5th (FA was actually 4th), but the Glicko-based match-making system throws in some randomization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Order.7258 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Anet how are we suppose to compete if we don't have double the numbers of our opponents? WE NEEDS A LINK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 o.o they are beating us. and tc. why the qq. clearly, they dont need the link https://wvwstats.com/na Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyShroud.2865 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 > @"Optimator.3589" said: > Suppose for a moment that the threshold for a server to be full is 2500 players. Server A has 2732 players that got in before it locked. Server Z has 4821 players that successfully overstacked onto it. Both servers are full, but A gets a link while Z does not. Now why do you think that may be? It is a matter of consistency. If previously they chose not to give full servers a link, why are they doing it now? It is not like the previous full servers not any way lesser than BG. If anet is not showing consistency, then it simply means they are not basing their decision on any fixed set of principles. It is good as they doing it because they can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 if bg will end up last like jq before then, maybe it will have a link. but are you willing to risk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iris Ng.9845 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 I enjoy T3. Easy fights. Maybe BG should never get a link and stay in T3. That way we don't have to worry about the gaping holes in our coverage. Thing is, our pins said the fights are boring, so we need something to motivate them logging in WvW. Dilemma! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 i think next matchup, unless you tank, you guys will be in t2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threather.9354 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Linkings and server status are based on the playhours. It just shows that BG players are not contributing enough. Maybe most of them are camp flippers and BG is just lacking off-hour commanders. Anyways T3 isnt that bad, its at the middle. Unfortunately being in higher tiers requires more than a few commanders tagging up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts