Avatar.3568

I would Suggest to use the quickness for yourself, to run away, get a fast heal out or bursting enemy's

The problem on renegade is more sevenshot or/and dwarf.

You can run celestial while sevenshot does 10k, and with dwarf you are literally immune to cc

Kalla is not the big problem

Maybe dodge or as renegade, use stability?

Pvp is super fun, I would not recommend this forum to see how pvp is, there are many people with passion for pvp, but most are not looking into the forum, because this is the biggest clown Fiesta in pvp.

It's a super fun game mode, we're you can get to your limits, Try metabattle, goddsofppv builds, try your own ideas, mess with things arround, you are not bound to such meta stuff as it is in raids, people come sometimes up with crazy wild builds and ideas, and it can work (if you are able to play it) play ranked games when you are able to, don't mind to your rank to much, mostly its deserved but if you are now silver or gold or Plat is not necessary, just have fun.

The biggest thing in this game is EU and NA server, na has not that much people Than eu. Matchmaking could go pretty weird (sometimes on eu too) also bots, toxicity and hackers (that's a really rare thing) are more on Na present than on eu

BUT on na is way more build diversity (probably because less good people.

Try it out have fun, and maybe look at the "welcome to pvp" discord it's a pretty friendly and helpful discord

> @"Thanks.6859" said:

> GAME ONE PLACEMENT WITH DCER #GET RID OF PLACEMENTS

>

You will still not loose mmr

But afkers and bots are a problem and anet should investigate more or at least hire some Gamemasters

I made my placementa today and so far 8/10 games were pretty enjoyable, 1 was very one sided and 1 was totally scuffed

For first week it's actually rly good

> @"Deniara Devious.3948" said:

> It is not just eternal champion...

>

> **Berserker sorely needs more sustain and redesign. Otherwise it is pretty much dead spec for spvp (and WvWvW).**

>

> All the berserker minor traits only benefit using berserker mode. When the berserker mode is over the berserker warrior is basically missing one trait line = huge design problem. To make matter worse: one needs to first build adrenaline to enter berserker mode and one cannot even exit berserker when one wants.

>

> Warrior used to be my 2nd most played profession, but it has been so bad for the entire year, I haven't used my warrior much at all for past half a year.

>

>

Healbreaker lol

Conquest is cool, more diverse in the game mode itself, you have small fights, big fights, you need to do quick decisions of rotating, where when and why.

Death match is not that bad and for some rounds not to bad but overall less attractive than conquest.

It's fine how they handle it now, but I wish more of the "special" at's

Shiro dwarf is there to win the game

Change it back that it gives pulsing stab (and might) every 3 (but only 1 stack) seconds for 1-2 seconds , for the complete Berserker duration.

The trait atm feels kinda useless and Berserker too

Play that what you are feeling best with, when you solo q, when you team q you can look for more class combinations that can work.

Idk if the majority is playing unranked but in ranked (5vs5) many playing solo q

> @"Daishi.6027" said:

> 2v2 and 3v3 would be better than conquest if they actually balanced around it, and Conquest wouldn't suffer for the changes.

If course conquest would suffer from. That changes

Imagine buffing Teamfight capabilities from ranger, thief and idk what else

In conquest they would totally rule

Ranger has the problem, that the weapon set (GS) got multiple times nerfed but birds were the main problem.

Now ranger can only kite while pet is killing your opponent or you go some soulbeast memebuilds

Just don't attack

Atm is off-season (3vs3 mini season) not that many are playing, while main season 5vs5 is pretty alive

At this Saturday is the monthly tournament, mightyteapot gonna cast it on twitch, there you will see much pvp

There is a reason why it's called Ranger

> @"ollbirtan.2915" said:

> > @"Avatar.3568" said:

> > > @"ollbirtan.2915" said:

> > > Guard is F tier now thanks to biased nerf. Core burn brainless build works ok up until mid gold. Good luck after that though. RIP Guard.

> >

> > Biased nerf? You mean you could full Bunker while symbols covored the whole node is biased?

>

> Ohh dear...you didn't get the message I guess. The symbol nerf did nothing to how bunkerish guards are. Nothing changed there. The only change is that now the only viable sidenode build also deals zero damage so it's useless. You can't really cap a node cause no damage, can't decap - not enough knockbacks etc. Sure you are a bunker. So what? Anyone with minimal pvp experience will just ignore you as you.

Imagine how many bunker guard gonna play that when they have 0 value

> @"ollbirtan.2915" said:

> Guard is F tier now thanks to biased nerf. Core burn brainless build works ok up until mid gold. Good luck after that though. RIP Guard.

Biased nerf? You mean you could full Bunker while symbols covored the whole node is biased?

> @"Sifu.9745" said:

> > @"Ragnar.4257" said:

> >

> > Basically, guardian will win against anything that tries to go toe-to-toe in melee range, and will lose against anything that can stay at 600+ range spamming range attacks

>

> Well, Guardian can do crazy dmg with Scepter (both Power and condi), which is 900 range. And most Guardians run Scepters/X as secondary weapon set these days, so staying in a 600 + range might not be a guarantee to win.

> I would like to see a LB ranger who can kill a Scepter Guardian, even if they both use only ranged weapons. No way. Scepter dmg (especially the condition one) is higher than LB dmg + Aegis, blocks and other defensive tools guardian can bring on.

>

>

100 gold that I beat that

Guard is beatable with ranger, and since the symbol radius is nerfed it is even possible to stand on node.

With holo Should be easy too

And necro should be able but I am not sure

Probably some mesmer builds too

Rest idk but every class could do it, depends on the player

> @"Poormany.4507" said:

> This again... See the many other threads about subscriptions in which the overwhelming majority strongly opposes the idea.

>

> If a subscription was implemented at this point, optional or not, many, if not most, players would either immediately quit entirely, or start playing much less due to having a disadvantage, making it uneconomical to implement one in the first place. If there's no additional in-game advantage like proposed, nobody would get the subscription.

>

> Maybe if a spinoff series, mobile game, or something like that was made, it would be fine, but I highly doubt there will be any kind of subscriptions in the console Guild Wars franchise.

Imagine I say it gets no advantage, maybe all of you that would quit the game should Read the post before you say that

> @"maddoctor.2738" said:

> > @"Bast.7253" said:

>

> > I don't think throwing more money at them is going to solve anything, whether it be gems or a subscription.

>

> Same. I feel as if the ratio of artists working on cosmetic skins versus programmers/content designers has gone badly towards artists over the last few years, which means throwing more money, means more cosmetics instead of more content.

I want to give them money that they can hire people that can code, not give it the artists

> @"The Fear.3865" said:

> Best idea ever, you'll be the very last pvp player AND throwin your money on sub every month, gg boi.

I asks that on a pvp related discord and got 5 yes in 10 seconds

> @"kharmin.7683" said:

> > @"Avatar.3568" said:

> > > @"jokke.6239" said:

> > > You can already do this, just buy gems. If you would rather have nothing, just don't spent the gems?

> >

> > i would only do it if they invest into the game not into something else

>

> What else would they invest it in other than the game?

1. they developed 3 games simultainisly.

2. i don't want investment in black lion shop more than into content for the smaller game modes

> @"jokke.6239" said:

> You can already do this, just buy gems. If you would rather have nothing, just don't spent the gems?

i would only do it if they invest into the game not into something else

Hey anet i am willing to spend money for you, on a monthly based subscribtion WITHOUT getting any Bonuses. I want an oppurtunity to give you my Money that you hopefully invest into the game. As a pvp player the gemstore does not attract me but i would like to give you money.

Give people a chance to pay you 1 time or monthly or yearly money but for getting nothing, i rly just want to support the game.

Thx and Greetings

Edit: i bet there are more players than me in pvp/wvw/Raids and stuff that rly enjoy what you created and maybe you could invest the money if its a lot into hiring people

Edit2: guys wtf I never said it's a must based sub, I don't want anything for the sub just invest to the game pls do not the fuck think I want that this game get pay 2 play