Kylden Ar.3724

> @"LucianTheAngelic.7054" said: > WvW needs more maps, not less. Sorry, more diversity of environments is ideal here. Removing the map would be a huge mistake Yep. I want Desert to be shrunk down _just_ a bit, and them to make a new 3rd borderland type. Like Jungle. Or forest.

One at least has the option for team and squad synergy, and the other is a Thief.

> @"Lucio.4190" said: > So... "I will beat the kitten out of you every day, just beause I love you and to make you stronger..." > Obvious troll is obvious. He's trolling the WvW forums too, claiming to be a developer for something "we'd all die without" with no concept of the SDLC or communicating to stakeholders. Report him, ignore him, and move on.

> @"Gorani.7205" said: > @Sviel.7493 summed it up pretty nicely, why DBL is different to Alpine. I like the DBL a lot for roaming around and scouting for my side. It turned into my favourite map, after the removal of the lag inducing laser event (which I agree, left the central area of the map too empty for any reasonably good action). > @Threather.9354 should take a look at his own poll, that gave the DBL a 33% approval, before he claims the playerbase doe snot want the DBL. :tongue: Aha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! His own poll disagrees with him. I love it!

> @"lare.5129" said: > > @"Kylden Ar.3724" said: > > Please tell us who you develop for so we can **never** use you as a vendor then. > I don't say it on this account, but funniest thing that I sure that you already use that product. It so funny, that I laugh 3 minutes. And one of fun that in these "free of monopoly :facepalm " you can't discard this product and not hurt proof of life. But back to that thread product process .. You still think that any task or case should be solved per half year??? Order it just by time creation order without other priorities and not check risks??? NOOO. > This is normal, that some process eat more time that half year. Is this nice? no. But this is normal common state form many many other projects.. > This is not small startup. So you can be ready that many things that already implemented in text inside task we will see may be after 5 years, or 10, or 30. > Sure buddy, sure you do. Just like the kids back in my school days that "totally have an uncle that works at Nintendo, and I know all the stuff!" You can take forever to deliver on a project. But not communicating at ALL about progress gets you fired. You sir are full of kittens. On reddit you would already be added to everyone's ignore list. > @"primatos.5413" said: > Alliances WHEN ?! Um, good sir, you mean, # "Alliances WHEN!?" yes?

> @"anduriell.6280" said: > The only way to fix that is to move on to alliances. # Alliances when!? No, really, we're tired of this re-link stuff. Admit you have delayed Alliances cause the bandwagon transfers are the only way you make money on WvW, stop re-linking, and let people settle back into their tiers they want, or give us Alliances!

> @"vier.1327" said: > > @"kamikharzeeh.8016" said: > > i mean they forgot it yet for years, before there was even any talk about an expansion. > > > > they even forget that links were meant to be a "temporarily solution" only. > > > > also someone forgot that alliances has been a nearly full planned concept. > > > > maybe also Arenanet just forgot that they have forums, who knows. > > Do not worry, mate, the squad is coming, this post will be as alive as his brother. > > For the Mist, For Tyria, For WvW Alliances! # Alliances when!?

> @"Sansar.1302" said: > Tittle says it all, maby with 3 maps: one sole q, one 5 man and one 20-30 man perhaps. > I know most that play wvw now is going to hate it, but seeing how few people that play Guild Wars 2 want to even try wvw i belive this is the way to go. How about no?

> @"lare.5129" said: > > @"Kylden Ar.3724" said: > > If I ignored my stakeholders on a project for 2 years, I'd get fired. > this is only yours and yours employer inner cooperation issue and/or vision. Don't share it for all world as single pattern please :) > I am developer. Currently have on board task 7 year old.. Don't see any panic. Please tell us who you develop for so we can **never** use you as a vendor then.

And who exactly _should_ pay them?

Specifically 9 - once for each class. Each has Ascended Weapons and Trinkets. The most played (Mesmer, Ranger, Guardian) has full ascended armor, the rest have one or two parts each as things has dropped randomly.

> @"lare.5129" said: > > @"Strider Pj.2193" said: > > Agreed. Just drop us a note, maybe a little nod to yay or nay... > we already get that the 2 years ago. I am sure it is ok. Or what, next stem ask current state each day by mail ??? > > If I ignored my stakeholders on a project for 2 years, I'd get fired. So again, I ask, #Alliances WHEN!?

If you still want to use it just to get around, you will need at least one point in it, but past that, if you'd rather use the rest of your points for other defense until you have more ranks, that can be a perfectly valid plan.

> @"ArchonWing.9480" said: > Ah yes. That kind of guild. They pretend their servermates don't exist until they have a use for them. It's not very smart to shun people and then demand their help 5 minutes later after you 1-push into another group of similar size, but that's just me! > > Any guild that cannot function because they can't queue the map is not worth the space. Same treatment JQ has been giving KN since the re-link. Do nothing but badmouth us in team chat, then complain when we don't come to their calls for help. Sorry, if you are going to act like you don't want us there, we will pick our own objectives to defend or take. OG Kaineng had to perfect havoc teams and fighting outnumbered long before links, and we can continue to do that without you.

> @"kamikharzeeh.8016" said: > > if u don't know the reason of these reminder posts, we do remind Anet to give us at least information of an update they promised us _years_ ago. 2 years ago now. No communication, no updates, no hope, ONLY LIES! All is vain! #ALLIANCES WHEN!?

> @"Strider Pj.2193" said: > > @"Kylden Ar.3724" said: > > > @"Strider Pj.2193" said: > > > Two people can take a T-3 tower, 3-4 a keep. > > > > > > Having supply from one person being enough to fully build siege isn’t an answer that will work. > > > > Sometimes you can solo a T3 keep if you time it right and no one is on (or they won't stop obsessing over stupid middle fort). > > > > > Agreed. > > Though I know MY limitations. I could get in and get to the lord, but I wouldn’t be able to solo them. I just am not good enough to do that. > > I think what the OP fails to realize is Havocing is often as fun as roaming. Making a servers Zerg freak out and run back to their EBG or their BL to defend something can be one of the most satisfying moments in the game. > > We had a group of 5 of us keep one of the celebrity commanders coming back to their garrison (T3) 4-5 times in a matter of an hour. > > They didn’t wipe us any of the times, and we escaped to come back. > > THAT is fun to me.. ? > > Now... did we end up in 5vX skirmishes from that? Yes! Which is what made it fun. But his Zerg didn’t touch us. > This _is_ the way.

> @"kamikharzeeh.8016" said: > yeah lol. no pandemy can last that long. EoD is announced for like summer 2021 or so? in the meantime we will have most of the covid risk group people yet getting their medication. :9 > > in the waiting time however, we may still ask > alliances when? You mean # ALLIANCES WHEN!?

> @"Strider Pj.2193" said: > Two people can take a T-3 tower, 3-4 a keep. > > Having supply from one person being enough to fully build siege isn’t an answer that will work. Sometimes you can solo a T3 keep if you time it right and no one is on (or they won't stop obsessing over stupid middle fort). > @"uberkingkong.8041" said: > > @"Swagger.1459" said: > > Try spvp. U will love it! > > Hopefully they make CANTHA open world PvP. Have a wilderness area like in Old School Runescape. > Then I can just do that and never worry about PvP and WvW. > IMO Open World PvP > PvP and WvW combined. You clearly have not played enough to have a notion how just colossally bad that idea is.

> @"Super Hayes.6890" said: > Cyberpunk sounds like a waste of time and money. I have a perfectly good game right here! Most importantly, it's a single player story game. I can avoid spoilers and it will be just as good when it gets down to $30 or less and I buy it then. And they might have fixed the bugs by then. And as always, # Alliances When!?

> @"Redponey.8352" said: > Is it the job position for the "Alliance system" Dev? :) The question they must ask in the interview is #Alliances when!?!?

> @"purple.6194" said: > fix perm stealth keep hiding and porting. > I know wvw is dead, the siege side of things is dead, roaming is dead, support is dead, hackers don't get banned, get it all out of the way not here to dispute any of it. > The mount sniff bell, to *indicate* a stealth enemy may be in the area, is not the counterplay to a perm stealth deadeye. Nor is the static paint trap that can be removed instantly > It isn't, there are so many things wrong with stealth in gw2 but lets just go one step at a time. > Since I spotted some changes recently that resemble someone blowing the dust off the wvw shelf Here I am No, no, I am sorry, you do not understand, the real question is #Alliances When!?!?

> @"Jura.2170" said: > Honestly why is Jade Quarry given a bad link again? We had Sorrow's Furnace for the last 2 months, and it was so empty, a lot of our people and guilds quit the game for that time > > They won't come back if we keep getting empty servers for links > > At least make Jade Quarry a link itself to a server with more players, or merge us with a T3/T2 server like Tarnished Coast Kaineng isn't empty! There is at least 40 of us across 4 WvW guilds. We all just have jobs and basically only play reset and Saturday night.

The Child Hungers for the Updates on #Alliances when!?

The child hungers! #Alliances when!?

> @"joneirikb.7506" said: > So let me get this straight, your poll is basically: > > * Yes if you want any change. > * No if you don't want any change. > > If so, that would basically boil down to: > > Do you want to get rich? > > * Yes! > * No! > > The poll itself becomes meaningless, and this should have been a thread just asking for what changes people want to see. Yep, why I voted no. Bad ideas, bad poll.