Any explanation why Sbi still in t3?

[Sovereign.1093]

Except for t1. Winners per tier go up. Sbi won, why did they not go up?

[dtt.2768]

Because FA and Kaineng tied in t2.

[Sovereign.1093]

щ(˚ ▽˚ щ)

 

mmmm

 

ok.

 

did the winner in t2 go up?

[Illconceived Was Na.9781]

> @"dtt.2768" said:

> Because FA and Kaineng tied in t2.

 

They had identical scores?

[Sovereign.1093]

> @"Illconceived Was Na.9781" said:

> > @"dtt.2768" said:

> > Because FA and Kaineng tied in t2.

>

> They had identical scores?

 

yes. who would have thought.

[Strider Pj.2193]

> @"Sovereign.1093" said:

> щ(˚ ▽˚ щ)

>

> mmmm

>

> ok.

>

> did the winner in t2 go up?

 

Yes. And the T1 3rd place went down.

[LetoII.3782]

Had several ties at this point. A tie for second means either no first or third place to go up or down, respectively

 

Is respectively a word? Soo hung over -_-

[HazyDaisy.4107]

The T2 scores were pretty close most of the week actually, like 1 point difference close. Yesterday, 3 skirmishes before reset, it was possible to have a 3 way tie, but someone lit the ppt fuse and that didn't happen, would've been interesting to see what happened.

[Sovereign.1093]

a tier should try a 3 way tie. would be fun to see

[borgs.6103]

> @"Sovereign.1093" said:

> a tier should try a 3 way tie. would be fun to see

 

I think that would just result in nobody moving up or down in that tier, and making the other tiers not move as well depending on which tier the 3-way tie happens.

[LetoII.3782]

The inverse ppt stress would be fun mapchat

[Chaba.5410]

> @"Sovereign.1093" said:

> a tier should try a 3 way tie. would be fun to see

 

I thought the same thing because I'm curious as to whether the 1u1d system would handle the case properly or bug out. It was completely do-able in one of the last skirmishes but people were more interested in helping HoD up in to T1 so they could fight SoR.