Ryudnard.2587 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 Aoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 42???????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dayra.7405 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 > @"Sovereign.1093" said: > 42???????? 42 is the answer, not the question ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 > @"Dayra.7405" said: > > @"Sovereign.1093" said: > > 42???????? > > 42 is the answer, not the question ;) what is the question? 42. :) so it could be too. >3< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dayra.7405 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 > @"Sovereign.1093" said: > > @"Dayra.7405" said: > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said: > > > 42???????? > > > > 42 is the answer, not the question ;) > > what is the question? 42. :) so it could be too. >3< If you would have said: 42!!!!!!!!!!!, ok, but you said 42????????? ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonSeed.3528 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 We must consult the magic conch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 > @"Dayra.7405" said: > > @"Sovereign.1093" said: > > > @"Dayra.7405" said: > > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said: > > > > 42???????? > > > > > > 42 is the answer, not the question ;) > > > > what is the question? 42. :) so it could be too. >3< > > If you would have said: 42!!!!!!!!!!!, ok, but you said 42????????? ;) an answer and a question :) by answering the question with an answer but also a questiom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dayra.7405 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 So you questioned that your answer, answered this question, yeah, that make sense as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 > @"Dayra.7405" said: > So you questioned that your answer, answered this question, yeah, that make sense as well. 42 =) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dayra.7405 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 > @"Sovereign.1093" said: > > @"Dayra.7405" said: > > So you questioned that your answer, answered this question, yeah, that make sense as well. > > 42 =) After we answer this question, now only 1 question remains: is "Aoe" a question or a statement or ...? (I know the likely best answer to this question is 42 as well ;) ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zinkz.7045 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 Are you making the point that the GW2 playerbase is so bad that successfully hitting AOE on bunch of players grouped together, then getting a chubby on about being top of the DPS like a PvE hero, constitutes "skilled" play in WvW? If so I agree, it is funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mil.3562 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 What is going on here? This is what happens when the Mod disappeared for too long... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godofcows.2451 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 I AGREE o(*≧▽≦)ツ/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stand The Wall.6987 Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 the real problem with aoe is that not all of them are standard multiples of 60. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kovu.7560 Posted July 22, 2019 Share Posted July 22, 2019 Increasing target cap on AoEs to 42 is an awful idea and you should guys feel bad for suggesting it. ~ Kovu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetoII.3782 Posted July 22, 2019 Share Posted July 22, 2019 3 letters x2 nets all this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 what is not the answer or the question though? it could not be about single targets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arioch.6507 Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 Clearly the only answer is, Single Target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycoprophet.8107 Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 No two aoe's can stack, would that help? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 > @"Psycoprophet.8107" said: > No two aoe's can stack, would that help? mmm no one would die. =p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dayra.7405 Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 How about "weak friendly fire" for AoE in the sense of: it doesn't damage your friends, but your friends count towards AoE-Limit, i.e. if you put your AoE in a area with 5+ friends no enemy inside is damaged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovereign.1093 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 buffs will probably be single target now @.@;; guards can only give one other stab Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now