Jump to content
  • Sign Up

snoow.1694

Members
  • Posts

    237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by snoow.1694

  1. Told you guys that Herald will become a problem, even if I was slightly off with my „wEaVeR bUff“ lmao
  2. Please bring back the Vermilion Tail Feather Skin for Black Lion Statuettes or offer it in the gemstore, my Credit Card is ready! Much thanks in advance! :# ![](https://i.imgur.com/Uyo9H0k.jpg "")
  3. I think we can talk about the first sign of an unwinnable situation when you get +1ed somewhere, survive through kiting, bind them and your team still manages to lose the rest of the map in a 4v3. But then again, every game can be winnable - happens all the time that a team gets a grip halfway through the match in games that most would consider unwinnable
  4. > @"Falan.1839" said: > Yeah, everything fixed. Rev still a premium class with 4 meta builds, resistance rune nerf making condi sider builds more obnoxious than ever, Burn DH untouched except for a bugfix, the META IS FIXED GUYS. > > Except that I mentioned both, Burn DH and Rev. If we say both specs will be nerfed in the future, there is really not anything problematic left, except maybe Soulbeasts as sidenoders. All the problematic specs falling slowly out of meta will also enable less played classes like Mesmer
  5. > @"Dawdler.8521" said: > Where is the maybe option? This poll is a sham! I got exposed :o
  6. > @"Sven.7201" said: > That's a super good idea if it works as atended! I think it is a great idea too. All jokes aside it would be easy to implement and would better the situation in general
  7. > @"Stand The Wall.6987" said: > > DON'T STOP BELIEVIN Lmao 9 and a half hours to go and we got our answer
  8. Unless the CAPTCHA involves us picking pics of traffic lights I don‘t want to hear about it
  9. Thing with endless 1v1‘s is participants are at fault if it doesn‘t end for playing too tanky builds, including you. Run bers amulet and you won‘t get a 3 minute 1v1, big promise
  10. > @"Svez Poizon XD.5268" said: > Yes and nerf teef! YES AND NERF THE STEALERZ
  11. Thing is - if a big balance patch would be coming, they would/should announce it a few weeks earlier and we haven‘t gotten anything in the past weeks. I still hope a balance patch is coming next update, but I think you are right and Anet won‘t deliver, despite all the frustration right now
  12. Yes, more stealth on classes that aren‘t supposed to use stealth is exactly what this game needs. Also who except Necros could use that broken rune?
  13. Nothing is happening in PvP - we don‘t get new content, new rewards, regular balancing or any feedback. Sad to see how the mode is declining and how little is done to stop it. Maybe you are working on something we don‘t know about, but as it is right now, many don‘t even bother to log on anymore for sPvP
  14. Another month of this unfun meta, not even going to bother to log on
  15. Most top players do exactly what you are trying to stop, pushing far directly or from close to far into a 1v1 they know they will win and if they get +1‘ed, they stall through kiting and jumping puzzles in order to bind people in a 2v1, while the rest of the map falls into their hands in a 4v3, winning them the match. You pretend like they are afk‘ing on point and leaving the rest up for slaughter when in reality they are in a 1v1 or 2v1 at far 90% of the time with the exception when they defeat an enemy, whom they basically spawn camp from that point on, leaving the rest of you in a 4v4 while one point is constantly ticking in your favor This whole talk of „only play close and mid“ is typical gold division talk - players who get baited in a 2v1 or 3v1 at their close against one tanky scrapper/decap druid/soulbeast/spellbreaker/weaver and lose the rest of the map, because they refuse to send someone far are daily proof of that. Playing sides will always be more strategically favorable than playing close and mid
  16. > @"Lucentfir.7430" said: > That's not very nice, trying to make a plat exclusive club so you can keep all the good may mays to yourself :< Yes you could look at it like that, but I think preventing the damage people do, who play mostly just one class and have a limited understanding of the game, has priority. It is ridiculous to see how build diversity has gone to 0, because of unjustified & unresearched critique
  17. > @"Asuran.5469" said: > Problem with this, IE: > > * The other day I counted the amount of p2 in NA, it was 28. None of these players aside from myself even post in this forum. > * The amount of p1 in NA is roughly double that of p2, maybe of which 3 or 4 of those players even post in this forum. > > Thats actually a good critique, I haven't thought of that - even more of a reason to have the requirements set at P1 or G3.
  18. > @"Markri.9475" said: > why so low as plat 1? thats hardly a requirement of skill, or knowledge about balance. > You could have started at top250. Though top 100 would mean more. > I'm against the idea though, as even top players don't know how to get balance done on a whole. I chose specifically Plat 1, since Plat 2 and above would basically mean only Top 100 players would be allowed in to take place in balancing issues and it could therefore be heavily exploited by strong teams, who usually place quite high. I think Plat 1 would be a great compromise, since it is close anyways to Top 250. And I agree even some plat players don‘t know what is going on, but an average plat player has generally more understanding of the game than a silver player, it is just facts or divisions as a whole would make no sense
  19. This is why posting in the PvP forum should be allowed only for Plat players and above. What a nonsense thread
  20. Meanwhile ArenaNet is working on new chair skins lmao. Guild Wars 2 always had potential, but the devs have the wrong priorities. No post game player will stay long when PvP is straight garbage for several months of the year, but that doesn‘t seem to go through ArenaNets head
  21. > @"Filip.7463" said: > > @"snoow.1694" said: > > I also think people should get specific one-time rewards for jumping up divisions in ranked or finishing in one division > > There is. Indomitable legend - reached lege once in lifetime. Top 250 title is like p2+, top 100 like high p2+.... > I know, I place usually P1/P2, that‘s why I added the comment - how can there be a correlation when all plat 1, gold, silver and bronze players are ignored for placing in certain division as high up as plat 1? They should at least get something for reaching the next upper league and plat 2+ players should be rewarded better for placing high, not just with a title
  22. > @"Filip.7463" said: > Good players dont play pvp for rewards. > > 20golds from chest + 15gold worth mark are good enough. U can get 10golds just by loosing all matches on AT. Yeah..because you decide what gOoD players do and don‘t. It is not like people are playing AT‘s for the gizmos every single month. No, we play Khylo for the 3000th time just to look at a monitor. What sense does it even make to say no to more content and ways to spend your pointless currency? Also gold or sKiLL is the worst incentive to continue to play the game - I could go farm PvE mobs and make more gold than in PvP and what difference does skill make? So I and 9 other people can feel lucky to be among the best, while others don‘t give a kitten, because there is no esports league where skill would matter anyways? Saying no to new content that is meant to get rid of your 13K unused Ascended Shards of Glory is like saying no to your boss when they want to pay you out for your extra work, completely illogical
  23. I also think people should get specific one-time rewards for jumping up divisions in ranked or finishing in one division other than a title for reaching top 250, which is in my eyes just an extra „gift“ for placing high snd not correlated to the division a person reaches
  24. > @"Cynz.9437" said: > Yes, yes, yes. My outfit is not the same without ghostly infusion :< > What is funny, legendary trinkets (pve ones including) get to keep their effects in pvp. Same here, if I pay 2000g for a vial of aurilium to finish my outfit I would like if others could see it in the game mode I play the most =)
  25. > @"Random Weird Guy.3528" said: > > @"Megametzler.5729" said: > > That norn. :lol: > > I'm glad you appreciate a good fashion sense. > > ![](https://imgur.com/vyp050c.png "") > Lol the name :lol:
×
×
  • Create New...