The Greyhawk.9107

> @"kharmin.7683" said: > I'd rather have a charr as a mount... Oh, this is one of _those_ threads, my mistake. Far be it for me to judge...

> @"Yggranya.5201" said: > > @"JusticeRetroHunter.7684" said: > > > @"paShadoWn.5723" said: > > > Replace daily gold reward with daily gold tax, amount based on highest character/mastery level on account. > > > If an account goes bankrupt after tax deduction, suspend it but allow gem-to-gold conversion. > > > To make things even ~~worse~~ more realistic, allow harvesting of nodes on the map only after buying gathering license which lasts until the change of maps with gold, or permanent license with gems, cost of said license calculated dynamically based on average TP worth of all map nodes. > > > > The PVE community from my very short time being here is very toxic (more than Pvp) and can't take a joke. But ya, this post gave me a good laugh thanks. > > All communities are more or less toxic so all you can do to avoid that is that you lock yourself into your house, cut all connections to the outside world and go sit on your bed, grab your legs and cradle yourself from side to side while humming calmingly to yourself as you fall to sleep. They can't be toxic in your dreams (i hope for your continued mental health). Indeed, what game has JusticeRetroHunter been playing if they think that GW2's pve community is abnormally "Toxic", would hate to see what'd happen to them if they were ever on something like CoD, LoL or even something like BDO. Kinda feel sorry for them.

> @"Junkpile.7439" said: > What is even should do in this episode? Umm, wut?

As Kharmin has already stated, its probably too late to change how mounts work without a significant amount of work that I don't believe Anet is willing to even consider. But I do agree, the size of mounts shouldn't have been tied to the height scaler but to the race of the character. I don't like using some mounts with my Norn or Charr characters due to how stupid it looks, and has started to put me off using those characters.

> @"kharmin.7683" said: > Wouldn't that be more of a cloak than a cape? No, not so much, cloaks aren't long capes, and capes don't stop being capes if they get to a certain length. While the are longer than most capes, cloaks need **hoods** and typically need to be able to wrap all the way around the body. Lemme let Shad explain it further:

Give me off-hand swords for either Thieves or Rangers (or both) and you'll get my support for this. Otherwise I don't care.

> @"Astralporing.1957" said: > I think we have enough of gemstore items already. Yeah, like that's ever going to happen. > @"kharmin.7683" said: > > @"The Greyhawk.9107" said: > > What I'm waiting for is a half-cape combined with an arrow quiver. My ranger's been using the same quiver for over seven years now, and I want to wear a cape and a quiver. I want it **_BAD_** . > As a ranger main, I would like this too, depending on how it's made/presented. Sadly, though, I feel that this would be too niche of an item that would not sell in the quantity necessary to justify the work put into it. I hope your wrong. Cuz in case I wasn't clear, **_I WANT IT BAD_**

> @"kharmin.7683" said: > I'm not much of a fan of the half-shaved head look, but in the selections provided I think it looks better. Much the same, but if its gotta be part shaved go with the semi-normal one on the right.

> @"lokh.2695" said: > Nah I'm fine. Could have done without capes at all and I think resources are better spent elsewhere. The resources were going to go to some kind of back item, just at Anet's been doing for years. As back items of any type are predominantly Gem store items they make up a significant portion of Anet's revenue, so why not capes? As for the suggested item, kinda depends on how close to a cloak you want to go. Teratus brought up the issues with making a true cloak or a close facsimile, something I wrote about on a similar thread a few months back. But a longer, slightly wider, and overall simpler style of cape would be a nice. What I'm waiting for is a half-cape combined with an arrow quiver. My ranger's been using the same quiver for over seven years now, and I want to wear a cape and a quiver. I want it **_BAD_** .

> @"Khisanth.2948" said: > Turning waypoints into actual in world objects instead of leaving them as purely game mechanics was a mistake in game design. Now every WP needs an explanation for > its existence. This. They absolutely should have remained a mechanic that was ignored by lore. When you allow yourself to think to much about it waypoints break more than a few points of lore, and in one or two cases the Lore permanently breaks a waypoint (see the Fort Concordia waypoint, which appears on the map but hasn't function in at least five years, probably more).

> @"Plagiarised.2865" said: > > @"Konig Des Todes.2086" said: Though I only see the later happening if they forego the whole need to have multiple replacements for the Elder Dragons (which is what will upset me). > > I see you bring this up a lot, Konig, but I still feel like they can make Aurene the sole Elder Dragon. If she circulates and shares magic rather than hoard it? > That'd be some pretty bad and lazy writing if Anet went that route.