lokh.2695

> @"kharmin.7683" said: > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/115180/player-house-instances](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/115180/player-house-instances) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/105417/should-there-be-player-housing-in-gw2](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/105417/should-there-be-player-housing-in-gw2) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/100263/in-game-housing](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/100263/in-game-housing) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/93607/yet-another-housing-topic](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/93607/yet-another-housing-topic) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/85408/if-housing-was-a-thing-on-a-future-expansion](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/85408/if-housing-was-a-thing-on-a-future-expansion) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/89875/optional-premium-and-housing](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/89875/optional-premium-and-housing) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/92048/if-instanced-housing-gets-added-would-you-all-be-ok-with-them-selling-bigger-instances-for-gems](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/92048/if-instanced-housing-gets-added-would-you-all-be-ok-with-them-selling-bigger-instances-for-gems) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/74565/anet-please-give-us-in-game-housing-with-expansion-3](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/74565/anet-please-give-us-in-game-housing-with-expansion-3) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/77588/what-if-housing-had-its-own-mastery](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/77588/what-if-housing-had-its-own-mastery) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/78204/player-housing-like-the-movie-fantastic-beasts](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/78204/player-housing-like-the-movie-fantastic-beasts) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/52008/player-housing-as-expa-3-new-feature](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/52008/player-housing-as-expa-3-new-feature) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/53764/why-is-there-no-personal-housing-in-gw2-yet](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/53764/why-is-there-no-personal-housing-in-gw2-yet) ^^this and Nope.

> @"kharmin.7683" said: > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/117814/tengu-could-be-a-useable-races-on-eod](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/117814/tengu-could-be-a-useable-races-on-eod) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/101886/if-tengu-becomes-playable](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/101886/if-tengu-becomes-playable) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/105085/playable-tengu-idea](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/105085/playable-tengu-idea) > [https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/105334/chance-of-tengu-playable-race-in-the-new-expansion](https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/105334/chance-of-tengu-playable-race-in-the-new-expansion) ^^this And nope.

Short answer: to create (pseudo)content. Slightly longer answer: To keep players engaged with the game over longer periods of time. By timegating materials/currencies/achievements ANet wants to make sure that a player keeps playing every day. For once there's the fear of missing out, when you skip a day, also, while the player has logged in, "only to do the daily [whatever timegated thing]", the player might just as well keep playing for another hour or two. Maybe economy has something to do with it as well, but I'm not an expert on that matter.

I understand that more is more and more is always better. So why stop at 10? Make it 15 or 20. Then after a while, when 20 are no longer enough, raise it to 40 or 100 or a fantastillon templates. Would more slots be better for the few who need them? Yes. Will any number be enough for that portion of the playerbase? Probably not. I have bought additional build and gear slots for my favorite characters that I play in different game modes. But I'd advise people to go for character slots instead. For the price of one gear and one build template you get a new character with two gear and three build templates, as a bonus you get to play fashionwars again or maybe experience a branch of the story you haven't yet. Getting the gear might be a problem if you don't want to move gear around between characters, but tbh, if you play multiple builds/setups on a few classes, you are probably playing content that provdes you with asc gear and/or gold.

Didn't play much else in the last 8 years, but I've always been very "singleminded" when it comes to games so I might not count.

> @"Ayrilana.1396" said: > I’d rather they focus on the existing ones over creating yet another system they’ll later abandon. this (body is 6characters too short)

> @"Jwake.7013" said: > It's funny how people complain about the economy and barrens messing with it but when it's bots doing it there's push back from people "why should I care?" and then there's lag in a bunch of maps from bots teleporting around gathering nodes and opening chests all the time but "why should I care" because they don't understand. I mean if you don't care, why are you pushing back against the people that do care about the health of this game? Maybe just be quiet and let the people who actually care voice their concerns. Concerns are being voiced for years without end and nothing happens. ANet gives us the "they're not bots, they're just unattentively gaming which is ok" speech. I'd care if they did. But as long as ANet doesn't care it's kinda effortless to voice your oppinion.

> @"yoni.7015" said: > > @"Zoid.2568" said: > > > @"yoni.7015" said: > > > No thanks, underwater combat is no fun. > > > > They can make it fun with a revamp. > No, they can’t and they don’t have to. Just leave it like it is. > > B..but they did mounts...

At this point, I doubt that we can get transparency from ANet. Should they decide to ever comunicate with the community again it will most likely be shallow marketing speak. For that I don't need an ANet official. I can create my own marketing speak. "[enter your desired content] is definitely on the table and we're looking into it." "we might not bring [whatever floats your boat] to GW2 this year, but we're not writing it off either." "we've been working hard on [the next big thing] and we're sure it will bring something new to the game." "we are working on [whatever you feel is missing] but there are issues that we want to fix before going into the details."

> @"Evil.1580" said: > I have tried searching any fresh and relevant info in the forum and google but didn't find. Maybe someone knows something? :) > > 1. Legendary armory? When it's ready. > 2. WvW Alliances? It's on the table > 3. Plans for any new raids? Your call is very important to us. > 4. Any plans for performance optimization of the game engine? Please hold the line.

ANet doesn't care so why should you. Report and move on with your life. Or don't. Why bother.

Check the forums search option for the many threads on open world PvP we had in the past. Have a nice day.

Use the forums search option to find out why, there have been dozens of threads about it.

Only thing I want for the practice area is that it actually saves my settings. The option's there, it just doesn't do much.

1) There are always new players 2) There are always leeches at the meta event and if they outweigh the actual players, the meta fails. 3) Some metas, looking at you nuhoch lane, can actually fail if people don't know the mechanics. Veterans don't bother explaining the meta and new players don't know about the mechanics and so the meta fails. 4) Some metas need a certain amount of people, if not enough people show up, the meta fails.