[Feature Request] Ability to Disable Chest Armor

[Gryphon.2875]

> @"Friday.7864" said:

> Make it cost a ton of gems and earn a pile of money, just give it to people :lol:

 

I'd pay for it.

[kharmin.7683]

> @"Gryphon.2875" said:

> > @"Friday.7864" said:

> > Make it cost a ton of gems and earn a pile of money, just give it to people :lol:

>

> I'd pay for it.

 

Be careful. That's how we got the current iteration of templates.

[Dragon Priestess.9760]

Please let me dye my human female's bra. Then I'd use it all the time because it's the only fashionable top available.

[Gryphon.2875]

Perhaps, if making the toggle is too complicated with the coding, we could have an 'invisible' shirt in the Gem store, similar to the boots that are a rare drop.

 

But put it in the store. I'll buy it. Seriously.

[Gryphon.2875]

I've just started playing with my character's shirt off. The stat difference is barely noticeable, at least in PvE, and in PvP, gear is irrelevant anyway. ?

[Hannelore.8153]

> @"Gryphon.2875" said:

> I've just started playing with my character's shirt off. The stat difference is barely noticeable, at least in PvE, and in PvP, gear is irrelevant anyway. ?

 

Losing that sixth rune bonus hurts, though.

 

On topic: I never understood how whenever something like this is suggested, the "think of the children" argument comes up, meanwhile kids are constantly exposed to extreme violence in all media. Even if GW2 doesn't have blood, name one problem solved without killing, in some cases its excessive like when we kill people just for stealing, if you're lucky they turn green instead of dying.

 

There's reference the jails and the like and we even see a few but for the most part justice in Tyria seems to be served by indiscriminate murder from overpowered adventurers. The game is actually very violent (and pro-alcohol use) if you take a closer look at it.

 

But no blood or nudity so its okay.

[Fueki.4753]

Couple it with dyeable underwear, as well as a rise of the invisible shoe box drop rate and more sources for it, and you may have your invisible chest.

[Fenom.9457]

Honestly they should just make all of it hide-able at this point. We already have back, weapons, and half the armor so why not just to pants legs and chest?

[Fueki.4753]

> @"Fenom.9457" said:

> Honestly they should just make all of it hide-able at this point. We already have back, weapons, and half the armor so why not just to pants legs and chest?

 

Because they made the terrible decision to turn the invisible shoe box into the rarest item in the game.

[Tekoneiric.6817]

> @"Maria Murtor.7253" said:

> The community asked for a toogle off abillity for Footwear since release. Now we are punished with Treasure Mushrooms and a sadistic drop rate for Invisible Boots. More than 2,000 shrooms slayed unsuccessful - I lost hope Long time ago.

 

They could give us the toggle option on all armor and replace the invisible footware with something equally rare and coveted. Ideas?

[XYLO.7031]

> @"LiewKW.6410" said:

> There would be hundreds of human females running around topless. Please think of the children.

 

There are already a bunch of topless and bottomless mules running around DR and LA bank areas. This is not new.

[Fueki.4753]

> @"LiewKW.6410" said:

> Please think of the children.

Why should we think of the children if it's almost exclusively adults who are bothered with underwear showing?

[mercury ranique.2170]

I would prefer an option to hide the legs Armour and have the rest visible. I would prefer such a release before next nopantsday, to express my true nopantsself