Jump to content
  • Sign Up

wvwstats.com - Match Details - PPT Points (% PPT | % PPK) question.


Hagbard.7192

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

wvwstats.com shows in the Match Details for e.g

 

Server | PPT Points | % PPT | % PPK

Server A | 143k | 75% |25%

Server B | 172k | 81% |19%

Server C | 129k | 76% |24%

 

This means that e.g. on Server A 25% from the complete war score was from PPK (Points Per Kill) and 75% from PPT (Points Per Tick).

Is this really correct ?

 

PPT (Points Per Tick)

Points per tick/capture | Base Points | Secured| Reinforced | Fortified

Camp | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Tower | 4 | 6 | 8 |10

Keep | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20

Castle | 12 | 18 | 24 | 30

 

PPK (Points Per Kill)

2 points for killing or finishing (stomping) an enemy

1 extra point for stomping an enemy with the Borderlands Bloodlust effect

1 point for killing a hostile dolyak is worth 1 point, while escorting a friendly delivering dolyak provides 1 point at each destination.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Hagbard.7192" said:

> Thanks i will subscribe to this discord server.

 

You can "sanitize" the original post so it's not a match up thread: remove the world names, round the figures (e.g. `143k|75%|25%` instead of `142902 | 75.128% |24.872%`) and link to the source of the data. Then you're just asking about how to interpret the data, rather than asking about a particular match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anet chose to reduce the importance of PPK when they added tier based PPT. Been noting many times that tier based PPT is one of the core scoring issues of WvW and only make dominating servers dominate even more by lazy "defense" of uncontested T3 objective that no one bother with, but people in general doesnt seem to care so it's an accepted feature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Dawdler.8521" said:

> Anet chose to reduce the importance of PPK when they added tier based PPT. Been noting many times that tier based PPT is one of the core scoring issues of WvW and only make dominating servers dominate even more by lazy "defense" of uncontested T3 objective that no one bother with, but people in general doesnt seem to care so it's an accepted feature.

 

I agree. Tier-based PPT is supposed to be one of those incentives for capping and upgrading objectives, but it doesn't work well as that since objectives can upgrade unattended due to coverage gaps of opposing servers. Instead it becomes a positive feedback mechanism, allowing winners to win more easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Turk.5460" said:

> > @"Chaba.5410" said:

> > Sad when you can't even talk stats about a match here for fear it may be a match-up thread.

>

> No talking about not talking about match-up threads, please. I don't want you to get in trouble for not wanting to get in trouble.

 

This would be an issue if these were actually monitored.

 

~ Kovu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...