Trise.2865 Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 As evidenced over the past few weeks: there is no such thing as "reasonable" to unreasonable people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterix.9614 Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 > @"knite.1542" said: > 5000 gems per slot per character, minimum. That figure looks more realisitic tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eloc Freidon.5692 Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 150 gems per equipment template. 50 per Build template. Account template storage should all just be free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterDapper.5984 Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 At most 60$ for full access, but preferably 30-40$ A similar price to an expansion. Also the builds shouldn't be limited. Monetization of equipment storage is fine, but it should work from your inventory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Rainbow.6142 Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 reasonable should be free but my guess is 300 either for build or equipment template. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddbopkins.2630 Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 > @"Obtena.7952" said: > ... it's just some faceless game developer. > HoldUp......you are a anet dev in disguise. Lmao 100-200gems. It's a feature I got to keep paying over and over again. So if I have 4 toons I play and I want them all to have 3slots at least at 200 gems that's 2400 gems. Well over 20 dollars for a QOL feature on a 7 year old game with a 10 year old engine. I think any more then that would be unfair practice. It already is with the needed feature of repeated purchase for each toon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sobx.1758 Posted October 24, 2019 Share Posted October 24, 2019 > @"Eddbopkins.2630" said: > 100-200gems. It's a feature I got to keep paying over and over again. So if I have 4 toons I play and I want them all to have 3slots at least at 200 gems that's 2400 gems. Well over 20 dollars for a QOL feature on a 7 year old game with a 10 year old engine. I think any more then that would be unfair practice. It already is with the needed feature of repeated purchase for each toon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astralporing.1957 Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 > @"MisterDapper.5984" said: > At most 60$ for full access, but preferably 30-40$ A similar price to an expansion. Also the builds shouldn't be limited. Monetization of equipment storage is fine, but it should work from your inventory. I'd have to consider any cost that makes a full unlock for all your characters on a single account cost as much (or more) than a single expac to lie well within the category of "massively overpriced". After all, i would expect a single expac to offer way more than just one QoL feature and nothing else. Notice, btw, that if we agree to the pricing Anet is going to have for this feature, we practically assure that GW2 will never have any expansion again. Because why would they even think on working on one, if they could earn the same amount of money for something that requires far less work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teratus.2859 Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 My fair pricings would be.. 600-800 for 3 account storage templates. 50-200 gems max for equipment and build template slots since they are character locked and anything above that is a straight up ripoff imo... looking at you bag slot expansion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts