Sovereign.1093
-
Posts
5,441 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Gallery
Posts posted by Sovereign.1093
-
-
eotm, then, was more popular than wvw because it acted like a shared instance among na or eu. so if you give it pips, it will kill wvw.
-
> @"Strider Pj.2193" said:
> > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > @"Strider Pj.2193" said:
> > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > > @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > > > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > > > > @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > > > > > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > > > > > eotm solved the issue of population difference per time zone. twas the future.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not really as one side typically dominated the others in numbers. This was apparent in the rare occurrence when opposing sides did happen to collide.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > well thats how it is in competetion. 1 normally is better than the other 2. you got to have a winner.
> > > > >
> > > > > Except they dominated because they had more players. That’s what I was getting at when I replied to your post about claiming it solved the population difference by saying “not really”.
> > > >
> > > > actually it does in a way. it's more fair than 4 vs 40. :)
> > >
> > > So.. you would be willing to have a single player hotjoin system where you were distributed to the next world which needed a player?
> > >
> > > No queuing up with squads/parties? Really?
> > >
> > > Because that would be the only way you could assure ‘balance’ of numbers.
> >
> > you can queu as squad or party in spvp eotm wvw. where did u get the idea of single player queue?
> >
> >
>
> sPvP you can queue as a two person Group.
>
> Again, you don’t really want true population balance. If that was the case, you would be fine with limiting it to solo join which would place you on the side that had an opening.
>
> But again, this would effectively kill it and you know it.
actually no i dont know. it hasnt happened yet. but i do know if the imbalance is so great, its not worth time doing anything.
like eotm, there is a max capacity per match, but there should be a minimum cap relative to the total number of pkayers queing. hence it should always be near each other.
-
> @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > > @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > > > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > > > eotm solved the issue of population difference per time zone. twas the future.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not really as one side typically dominated the others in numbers. This was apparent in the rare occurrence when opposing sides did happen to collide.
> > > >
> > > > well thats how it is in competetion. 1 normally is better than the other 2. you got to have a winner.
> > >
> > > Except they dominated because they had more players. That’s what I was getting at when I replied to your post about claiming it solved the population difference by saying “not really”.
> >
> > actually it does in a way. it's more fair than 4 vs 40. :)
>
> A lot of the time, the difference in populations were just like that too. I believe this may have been due to overflows.
thats fine. tis eotm. i think we simply dont got the numbers to do a lot of tiers on some time zones.
-
> @"Strider Pj.2193" said:
> > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > > @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > > > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > > > eotm solved the issue of population difference per time zone. twas the future.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not really as one side typically dominated the others in numbers. This was apparent in the rare occurrence when opposing sides did happen to collide.
> > > >
> > > > well thats how it is in competetion. 1 normally is better than the other 2. you got to have a winner.
> > >
> > > Except they dominated because they had more players. That’s what I was getting at when I replied to your post about claiming it solved the population difference by saying “not really”.
> >
> > actually it does in a way. it's more fair than 4 vs 40. :)
>
> So.. you would be willing to have a single player hotjoin system where you were distributed to the next world which needed a player?
>
> No queuing up with squads/parties? Really?
>
> Because that would be the only way you could assure ‘balance’ of numbers.
you can queu as squad or party in spvp eotm wvw. where did u get the idea of single player queue?
-
> @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > eotm solved the issue of population difference per time zone. twas the future.
> > >
> > > Not really as one side typically dominated the others in numbers. This was apparent in the rare occurrence when opposing sides did happen to collide.
> >
> > well thats how it is in competetion. 1 normally is better than the other 2. you got to have a winner.
>
> Except they dominated because they had more players. That’s what I was getting at when I replied to your post about claiming it solved the population difference by saying “not really”.
actually it does in a way. it's more fair than 4 vs 40. :)
-
> @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > eotm solved the issue of population difference per time zone. twas the future.
>
> Not really as one side typically dominated the others in numbers. This was apparent in the rare occurrence when opposing sides did happen to collide.
well thats how it is in competetion. 1 normally is better than the other 2. you got to have a winner.
-
eotm got no pips.
-
eotm solved the issue of population difference per time zone. twas the future.
-
lets test it out first. =) speculation is fine but its not real
-
> @"hunkamania.7561" said:
> > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > @"hunkamania.7561" said:
> > > > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > > > @"hunkamania.7561" said:
> > > > > EoTM has some positives
> > > > >
> > > > > - No mounts
> > > > > - No gliders
> > > > > - No upgraded towers
> > > > > - No upgraded keeps
> > > > > - Mega servers
> > > > > - No banners
> > > > >
> > > > > The map just sucks and the rewards are lacking but there's a lot of positives.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > mounts and gliders should be in. =) its a big map. same reason why red bl was not popular before. took us ages to go from point a to b
> > >
> > > It's still not popular. I don't see your point.. mounts are used mainly to run away from fights and avoid combat. Game was better without them. Also Mount stomps are bad. Mounts are just something we don't need. Gliders are not as bad but we really don't need them either Anet just wants to sell glider skins to more people. Waste of the devs time.
> >
> > thats your perspective though, unless you have player data?
> >
> > we use mounts to run after the enemy. i like them, now i can chase those nike players.
> >
> > mount stomp is no downstate with extra steps. gliders are fun. players can respond fast to things being attacked.
> >
> > thats your opinion though.
> >
> > the only waste the devs did was cancel wvw tournaments
>
> - red bl is dead and can't Q reset. Ptters like u play it
> - mounts suck
> - tournaments won't do anything since the game is dead.
proof?
-
> @"hunkamania.7561" said:
> > @"Sovereign.1093" said:
> > > @"hunkamania.7561" said:
> > > EoTM has some positives
> > >
> > > - No mounts
> > > - No gliders
> > > - No upgraded towers
> > > - No upgraded keeps
> > > - Mega servers
> > > - No banners
> > >
> > > The map just sucks and the rewards are lacking but there's a lot of positives.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > mounts and gliders should be in. =) its a big map. same reason why red bl was not popular before. took us ages to go from point a to b
>
> It's still not popular. I don't see your point.. mounts are used mainly to run away from fights and avoid combat. Game was better without them. Also Mount stomps are bad. Mounts are just something we don't need. Gliders are not as bad but we really don't need them either Anet just wants to sell glider skins to more people. Waste of the devs time.
thats your perspective though, unless you have player data?
we use mounts to run after the enemy. i like them, now i can chase those nike players.
mount stomp is no downstate with extra steps. gliders are fun. players can respond fast to things being attacked.
thats your opinion though.
the only waste the devs did was cancel wvw tournaments
-
> @"hunkamania.7561" said:
> EoTM has some positives
>
> - No mounts
> - No gliders
> - No upgraded towers
> - No upgraded keeps
> - Mega servers
> - No banners
>
> The map just sucks and the rewards are lacking but there's a lot of positives.
>
>
mounts and gliders should be in. =) its a big map. same reason why red bl was not popular before. took us ages to go from point a to b
-
oh yeah, yesterday i crashed too. weird. it been awhile. i think its when i played scourge for a bit.
-
gonna command on my scourge this week. i know u thieves and rangers and warriors are gunning for us.
i mean every minute thers a dead eye mark. hahaha
-
well to be considered a matchup thread, it has to be talking about the inner workings of the three competing servers. i.e. x guild keeps pawning y guild and z guild com of C time zone laughing his ass off, and others of D team uses ac a lot.
this thread focuses solely on one server. =)
-
i care. =) dont generalize. foo (quagan speak).
-
it needs beta testing :) so we can give feedback.
i got to stress. devs need to join coms x fight teams and gather data
vets can pull off 8 cs 35 and win in various situations. they need to see that spectrum
-
=) they need to do atleast one organized fights to have an idea of how to do it. since theory is easy.
they dont have to be good. they just need experience
i like seeing our devs play. but sometimes i see their frustration when they got killed a lot in this stream.
-
i noticed on the last section when they started talking about fights - i feel they should join coms sometimes and gather data. because it's different to play as pugs not in coms and as a decent organized team in coms. :) i mean anet can make their own 5 man team to roam and do stuff to check it out.
-
mmm so we going to the direction of interrupt? i hope game remains action packed =)
of course, tournaments pls <3 1 week in 2 months, the week before reset. so we get 7 weeks preparation
-
we need a king of the hill map.
-
mesmer. we keep meeting the one hit combo thing rotation
-
yaks drop supplies. this makes sense actually.
-
yes. :3 we need a week where wvw is queued like spvp
World War III
in Looking For Guild
Posted
nice. looking forward to your exploits. wish i can come but that time is when i am at work >.