Ben K.6238 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 None of the above. The two parts that are missing for me are recurring quests for personal story characters, and a WvW rebuild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fallesafe.5932 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 > @STIHL.2489 said: > Ok we all know that Anet has limits, they literally can't make everything we want all at the same time. So here is the question, if it meant that it Anet would put direct focus and it's own team to take care of it, where that content would receive development and progress because it sold, Which of these would you be willing to pay cash for to see it get direct focused development, just so they could sell you more of it. Don't fall for the "poor, indie-dev Anet" meme. Their gem-store is a cash juggernaut. I've spent more money, by a factor of ten, on this game than I've spent on any other MMO. The question is just whether or not they want to invest that money back in the game, dev-team, etc or not. Nobody has to take up any special collections for "poor Anet" to give us new content lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ovinnik.9216 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 What is this? Crowdfunding for the rich? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conqueror.3682 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 I think they have the money. I paid for the expansion, i dont need to pay for content, what happens to people who cant pay? this is not a suscription based game and also i dont want to pay for advantages over other players who bought the expansion. But as an opinion. Focusing in dungeons is pointless because no one do dungeons. And if dungeons became profitable, then we will fall in the same class problems that we have with raids, Adding new raids does nothing because we still have the profession problems were people demands fixed comps to do them. Jumping puzzles are a good idea but not worth investing too much on them. Living world content will appear regardles of what focus the developers make. About new legendaries collection, i oposse to this, because most legendaries require materials from hot maps and now that there is less people in these maps is harder to get the materials, unles you make PoF metas to drop amalgamated gemstones then this problem would be solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just a flesh wound.3589 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 None of the above. I’ll pay for new expansions and I’ll pay for shiny pixels in the gemstore but I’m not paying for festivals, dungeons or other content that belongs in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AegisRunestone.8672 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Voted for a better written LS4. Especially one that caters to our characters' choices, race, etc. I'm very tired of my character being dumbed down to being basically a human in an asura body. PoF & HoT Spoilers: >! I know in The Departing story step, they show you the mentor of your order going in to die at The Battle of Claw Island. And in HoT, Modremoth pulls that Mentor from your memory in Hearts and Minds. But I still feel like my PS choices had little effect on the expansions and LS stories. I'd also like to see our personalty icon return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayakaru.6583 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Just because we pay anet more doesn't mean they can produce more. They've maxed their production capacity, and their spaghetti code makes it hard to hire new people do just more money wont fix the issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
videoboy.4162 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 I like your idea for collections, because it adds new armor and weapons that are obtainable just by playing the game. That type of content would probably be easier to create and implement than dungeons or other large things, giving us more stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenom.9457 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 All of those, without hesitation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westenev.5289 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 I'm all for any option that provides extra armour skins (preferably with simple designs that aren't too themed so they can me mixed and matched with existing armour). Hell, I'd even forgo the dungeons themselves if it meant we could see different sets of armour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omar Aschi Popp.7496 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Why should anyone pay for festivals? They mothballed Jubilee. And now you're telling me if I pay I get to have it back? Something that was free to begin with?! Enough of these "vip/sub/dlc" threads!! Gemstore works. Gemstore make more money than sub games Gemstore is EXCELLENT in its purpose. Do you seriously think the reason we don't get festivals, dungeon support and other stuff is because of a MONEY SHORTAGE???!!!! I have news for you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illconceived Was Na.9781 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 The poll questions are skewed towards the idea that ANet can offer us any sort of choice like that. By necessity, they have to deliver an entire package that succeeds. It's not enough for something to be popular among a subset of players, it's not enough to charge extra cash, it's about viewing the game holistically and making sure it appeals to enough of the target audience to keep enough veterans entertained and bring in fresh blood regularly. I trust ANet to deliver a game that entertains me. Even though I'm going to hate some decisions they make and feel that others are a bad idea for the future, I think they have a better handle on making a great game than any 5000 of us trying to simplistically reduce the question to "for what would you pay extra." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STIHL.2489 Posted November 5, 2017 Author Share Posted November 5, 2017 I think some people were over thinking this, this is not Plato, this is "if you could vote with your wallet, what would buy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curunen.8729 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Where's the other option. I'd pay full expansion money for a THOROUGH overhaul/balance pass/update over every single core and elite trait, skill, weapon, stat sets and everything that involves combat gameplay in all game modes - pvp/wvw/pve. I mean serious deep redesign of core mechanics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mourningcry.9428 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Another biased poll... yippee I'd pay to see an unbiased, constructive poll, as opposed to the refuse that's currently littering the forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fallesafe.5932 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 > @Mourningcry.9428 said: > Another biased poll... yippee > > I'd pay to see an unbiased, constructive poll, as opposed to the refuse that's currently littering the forum. What's biased about this poll? If you and I aren't willing to pass around the collection-plate for a company that's sitting on a mountain of money, then we "expect everything handed to us for free." Let's humble ourselves under the judgement of STIHL.2489, and reflect on our immaturity/unreasonableness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STIHL.2489 Posted November 6, 2017 Author Share Posted November 6, 2017 > @Curunen.8729 said: > Where's the other option. > > I'd pay full expansion money for a THOROUGH overhaul/balance pass/update over every single core and elite trait, skill, weapon, stat sets and everything that involves combat gameplay in all game modes - pvp/wvw/pve. > > I mean serious deep redesign of core mechanics. That would be called GW3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crossaber.8934 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 I prefer open world with story support, after finish the living story, i will go back to wvw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alchofas.8243 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Will we get any sort of privilege or status as one of the sponsor? But then, still no. Based with my understanding, it seems like you're trying to tell us to pay anet's development for some certain system we would like to see, that's more or less the same as sponsoring them and if i were to have the power to sponsor any games, i would have just started a project for my own game and use those money for its development instead. The thing is, we are now playing anet's game and how the game will grow and change to will be up to anet's decision, it is their game so they should be the one to decide, if we were in any way to be the one to decide its growth, then how would this be anet's game anymore? MMORPG is only interesting due to the enjoyment of seeing the developer's next move to the changes for their game, if we were to take that away, it would be better to just create our own game. We sure can support them by buying their stuff, but not paying for what they should do. I apologize before hand if this is just a for fun thread, sorry for being kill joy then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyrin.1035 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 "maybe kill off the people we don't like" - One name: BRAHAM. It must be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STIHL.2489 Posted November 6, 2017 Author Share Posted November 6, 2017 > @Alchofas.8243 said: > Will we get any sort of privilege or status as one of the sponsor? But then, still no. > > Based with my understanding, it seems like you're trying to tell us to pay anet's development for some certain system we would like to see, that's more or less the same as sponsoring them and if i were to have the power to sponsor any games, i would have just started a project for my own game and use those money for its development instead. > I don't view buying a product as sponsoring someone, because I am sure not sponsoring Walmart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altair.8402 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Where's the 'balance the game' option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenanthonio.6750 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 Dungeons! 1) Let’s put some more flavor on the older Dungeons (exclusive events, achievements, titles) 2) Higher Tier Dungeon with difficulty comparable to T4 Fractals or Raids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sephiroth.4217 Posted November 6, 2017 Share Posted November 6, 2017 There's no WvW/PvP related vote? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STIHL.2489 Posted November 6, 2017 Author Share Posted November 6, 2017 > @Altair.8402 said: > Where's the 'balance the game' option? no one's gonna pay for a nerf :+1: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now