Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Blude.6812

Members
  • Posts

    1,060
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Blude.6812

  1. > @"Hynax.9536" said:

    > > @"Garathorn the Brave.3162" said:

    > > A lot of people seem to talk about how ArenaNet are just out to make money from Gems... (which they obviously are). Just wondering why they don't offer a low cost 'Gem Subscription' rather than a Game subscription. Could maybe offer a 10% bonus in Gems if you sign up for 12 months @ say £10/month???

    > >

    > > I'm sure this idea will get totally slated but... just thought I'd throw it out there!

    >

    > I saw this idea being suggested a few times in the forum already ...........

     

    Yep this topic already has the 'Been There, Done That' achievement. No need to revisit.

     

     

  2. > @"Hashberry.4510" said:

    > > @"Blocki.4931" said:

    > > > @"Stalkingwolf.6035" said:

    > > > > @"Rasimir.6239" said:

    > > > > It might also be a case of bugs so obscure that tracking and fixing them takes an unproportionate amount of resources. Software can be complex to the point that stuff like that happens. Compared to the amount of events in this game it seems to me to be a very small subset of events that keep breaking, while I remember a lot of others fixed over the years. Would be interested to hear from a developer that tried to analyze the events in question, but then again I'm not even sure if explaining to us why they can't track those specific problems would really be a good use of their time.

    > > >

    > > > Thats not the probleme here. bugs get found and reported by players but anet does not fix them. Why? i think because they have not the man power to fix them.

    > >

    > > That's not really how it goes. You can know where something occurs, but that doesn't mean it's going to be easy to find out why. Since those events are core content, they likely exist for such a long time it simply isn't worth getting a dev to look into what might take a few hours just to fix a bug that may or may not be extremely rare. So yes, some things just aren't worth fixing.

    >

    > This line of thinking has infected industry all over. Software engineering has gotten away with it for so long people just accept it everywhere.

     

    You hit the nail on the head Hashberry!!!! And people excusing them only enable the devs to continue to the practice.

  3. > @"echolynfan.2049" said:

    > > @"zealex.9410" said:

    > > How do you see them adding unlimited flight without making every non flying mount useless?

    >

    > How often do you use the other mounts now? Tell me you don't use the Skyscale all the time.

     

    No I don't, its' use is situational and many things can accomplished faster and more efficiently using an other mount. Of course learning to use them( all the mounts) properly is a LTP issue. and how about using the search function instead of resurrecting a dead topic?

     

  4. > @"Cyninja.2954" said:

    > > @"Gopaka.7839" said:

    > > > @"Sigmoid.7082" said:

    > > > It doesn't really matter how many times this idea gets brought up it doesn't change the fact that it's overall not s great idea and will get shot down time and time again.

    > > >

    > > > Using the search function would show you the results of this discussion as time has gone on.

    > >

    > > Not winning the lottery doesn't stop you buying more lottery tickets and hoping to get lucky ... :D

    >

    > “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” - Albert Einstein

     

    And someone buying lottery tickets doesn't affect me in any way what so ever--LOL.

    and yes the search function does wonders

    and as Anet has clearly said NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. > @"Pifil.5193" said:

    > > @"Blude.6812" said:

    > > > @"kharmin.7683" said:

    > > > There are many threads that already discuss this topic to death. Please use the forums search function.

    > >

    > > ^THIS---why start another thread on a tired old subject that has been discussed to death.?????

    > >

    >

    > They didn't start another thread, they necroe'd a thread on housing and then, well, rambled about unrelated things.

     

    Thanks, will hit the 'report' button then.

  6. > @"Thornwolf.9721" said:

    > > @"GoldenPants.1870" said:

    > > > @"Inculpatus cedo.9234" said:

    > > > I enjoy the Skyscale very much; so much, in fact, that I barely use any other Mount.

    > >

    > > I mean I respect that, but in my opinion the Skyscale is just so.. underwhelming compared to the other mounts which did not even take 1/4 of the effort to get, which is my problem with it.

    >

    > 1. Let it fly all the time, the maps are instanced so its not like we will just fly up and over everything. (Invisible walls)

     

    Never going to happen. There is a thread about this specific suggestion. https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/82354/permanent-flying-with-skyscale

×
×
  • Create New...