Blude.6812

> @"Revolution.5409" said:

> > @"Sandzibar.5134" said:

> > What is going on with the constant influx of mediocre troll posts in here?

>

> It would be more worrying if Anet listened to these trolls

The trouble is that ANET does listen to minority.

The poll forgot about the 'None' option

RNG is bad for give-a-ways and the game --LOL

LOL . there is always one. Anet please fix.

> @"Trollocks.5084" said:

> Don't be hyperbolic or anything. It'll get fixed.

Just like they fixed pets during dismount so it wouldn't cause a problem for Rangers in the last patch. Don't get your hopes up.

Anet has really destroyed the ranger for me. Been my main since the beginning. Having an old bug (that was ignored and not fixed) on top of a really stupid change to pet swapping (PvE ) does not inspire any confidence in the current team for me.

Incredibly bad /poor/not tested/not wanted change for PvE. It seems to me that those in charge and those making the changes need to review their misguided changes to the game recently.

Been bad, got caught, complain on forums, feign ignorance.

The pet swap in combat change in pve was unneeded.

Thanks Andrew for ruining Ranger for me. Give me back my pet swap!!!!!

and it has been discussed (and dismissed) in other threads.

No, and will add this to my list of dumb ideas suggested in the forums.

I wonder if the name 'Certs Fo' Romms' is available for the OP.

I know what I feel about ideas like this, but commenting truthfully wouldn't be constructive, so a simple NO will suffice.

> @"Hannelore.8153" said:

> They should let people pay an optional subscription fee, because many people would, and it'd benefit the game for those who can't.

Nope!! It would only further divide the community that started with the mistake made when they added raids.

> @"Shadowmoon.7986" said:

>, the playerbase as a whole needs to get better.

And you wonder why some players want nothing to with strikes and raids and are failing to get people to join.

Strikes are fine, but no achieves should be associated with them.

Depends what map(s) you are playing.

> @"MikeG.6389" said:

> Wherever the population is, content tends to be rather easy. Proper scaling is what we need, I think.

Or just the opposite when pops are low (like South Meta). The ability for get scaling working seems to be something that Anet just can't do, which is too bad.

https://gw2crafts.net/

and you need to 'discover' recipes. This helpful site has those recipes too.

> @"Virdo.1540" said:

> Doing the strike mission with some innocent players together with dumb players that are just going to leech until the end, is complete garbage. Please remove the "public" option from this. Its killing the fun it once had.

Finally started to look in to strike missions since misguided Anet decided to put some achieves and Mastery behind them. And this is the 1st thread I hit. And you wonder why the "public" don't want to be forced in to playing just to get a mastery point.

Raids and Strike Mission--don't care, don't do. But when you place achievements or masterys behind them I think you will find many have had enough.

> @"Golvellius.7856" said:

> Raids are not a "tricky" problem to solve. The tricky part to fixing any problem is not listening to people telling you what the problem is. Imagine going to a clinic, and all the receptionists, nurses, and doctors have headphones in. That's you guys! lol Not you guys specifically - it's all MMO developers when we tell you what the problem with Raids is. It's like...you guys just zone out or something when we give you the root cause.

> :)

This^^^^^^^^^^^^ 100%

For me, the direction towards strike, raids , more grind, reducing XP gain etc. is exactly why I feel you are taking the game in the wrong direction and why I find there are many less players.