Blude.6812

Yep, Anet has been asked to fix that since the map first appeared and just haven't bothered. There is a way to get it by sitting on your springer, and standing on the 'hidden' pixel. I can get the chest every time doing it this way. It may take a few tries, even knowing the approx place to sit on the springer.

> @"Fueki.4753" said:

> > @"Blude.6812" said:

> > An e-mote?? The game is really starting to disappoint with the latest map addition.

>

> They have done with the prologue map already.

True, they seem to have lost their way.

An e-mote?? The game is really starting to disappoint with the latest map addition.

> @"Cyninja.2954" said:

> Use the event timers and try again and make use of the LFG tool to get on the correct map.

I use both regularly and they don't often help at all. South Meta immediately comes to mind as well as many others.

> @"Dahkeus.8243" said:

> It's as if OP's prayers were answered from the "Twist My Wish"/"Evil Genie" game:

>

> 

>

That looks really bad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> @"Jables.4659" said:

> > @"Ayakaru.6583" said:

> > Maximum negativity.

> > The legendary longbow was enough of a scar on this game

>

> I believe the weapon you are referring to is a short bow.

They both are!!!!!!!!

Seriously??? oh well.

'Nothing makes me as sad in GW2'--- as poor headings like this one (and there are many others) that are incomplete with the sole purpose of fishing people in. Because if the topic was clear, it would be ignored

OP, You can always make a 3rd and 4th topic on the same topic, like the two you already started.

My Little Ponies????? NO thanks, the bows are bad enough.

> @"Jimbru.6014" said:

> - Auto-targeting that targets everything except the mob that is actually in front of me hitting me. Auto-target should only pick up the closest target attacking you, or the closest unobstructed target in range in front of you, in that order of priority. Auto-target should never pick mobs that are out of range and/or obstructed.

>

^^ This, and not only that example, but in many areas they target mobs that are in a level below the player and never should a non combatant creature auto targeted.

and add custom cursors (not 3rd party) that don't get lost on busy screen and the ability to turn of other players visuals like gathering and gliders.

> @"Randulf.7614" said:

> I agree with you, but it is the only immediate solution. They increased the rewards for LS dailies but made each map rotate in once every 6 days. That gives you prob only 1 day a week to do it. The general feeling is on daily map days, that map is

> populated. Having done Jade recently ish, I am inclined to agree.

>

> Is a change coming? Almost certainly not or at least not in the near future. This is realistically your best shot in getting it done even though it isn’t ideal

The changes messed up Thunder Peaks too!

> @"kratan.4619" said:

> Would love to see this added, much more value add for me than wasting dev time on capes.

Both are, and were a waste of time.

> @"FOX.3582" said:

> Seems like people aren’t playing for fun anymore. Almost everyone is thinking about one thing only; how to get as much loot in the least amount of time. Sad.

The may be true, but the fact of the matter is Anet has a lot of activities, collections etc that are not fun and are just prolonged grinds for collections with incredibly restrictive RNG with poor returns.

By going to another game where fishing is the reason to play, otherwise not needed at all or dev time wasted on it.

P.S. this is a topic that has been addressed many many many many ......... times on the forums.

> @"Zexanima.7851" said:

> > @"kharmin.7683" said:

> > That's what I don't get. You don't want to necro older threads that have already covered these topics and then create a new one that doesn't add anything new to those discussions anyway.

>

> Idk what to tell ya mate. I'm sitting at work with nothing to do and was thinking about this so I figured I would see if anyone wanted to discuss it. You're welcome to pay no mind and not comment if it bothers you that much. Every time I want to talk about something I don't go "Oh, better go digging through the bowels of the forums to make sure someone else hasn't already discussed this before. Far be it from me if I accidentally bring up a conversation had before". Some new may come of it yet, it's not like the discussion is closed. That's why you **discus** it with other people to figure out **new** ideas. Maybe someone who didn't see the older threads will chime in, who knows.

>

Nah, I bet you have likely been around long enough to know that mods close and end necro'd threads. This is one of the ways people have used to purposly get around that. "Accidents" ???? nah. (discuss)

Even Raven Sanctum is a PIA with the make a choice dialogue. Absolutely no need after the player has made the achievement.

> @"Westenev.5289" said:

> > @"Shadowmoon.7986" said:

> > Are we playing the same game? There has only been one jp released since pof was released and it was ur khan gauntlet.

>

> What about Thunderhead Peaks (the dwarven crypt area). That had a few (fun) mini JP's you could complete at your leisure.

>

> Personally, I'm kind of hoping for another chalice of tears. Hard JP's bring out the best in the community, IMO.

Kinda of thinking that Anet had way too many complaints about this type of extremely bad jumping puzzle design and will never do it again. As for JP's they got it right in the latest maps. Swim right by and get the reward with out having to jump.

I am sure they have one ready to go, they are just trying to figure out how much to charge.

> @"Xar.6279" said:

> Do you really think that players which stopped playing in 2012 still care about their GW2 character nicknames? While they literally don't care about this game anymore?

> Current players and newcomers could use those nicknames.

Here we go again. Revisiting a well discussed and dismissed topic.

Pretty things to buy that have no impact on play seems to be the end content.

> @"Inculpatus cedo.9234" said:

> Seems a bit extreme over a survey. You, and everyone else is welcome, and encouraged, to give feedback here in the forums.

LOL---true, but then again anets consistent and daily responses to players questions and concerns are overwhelming, maybe they should get a forum communications team lead to co-ordinate.

Actually it's due to lack of population and the event not scaling to lower #s attempting it. Try on the day when that map has the dailys active.

> @"GW Noob.6038" said:

> > @"knite.1542" said:

> > Longbow gets outperformed by scepter as far as damage goes, that is why.

>

> Which begs the question: WHY did Anet make a one-handed weapon much more powerful than a two-handed weapon? You don't have to answer that, I just find it absurd and unjustifiable.

>

> > When the evil, DPS-meter using meta pushers put out builds, they normally put in the best in slot equipment, which would be why you don't see longbow advertised as the weapon of choice a lot.

>

> Those are the people you see attacking inanimate golems, and such? I don't think they're evil people - they're creepy, no doubt about that, but I don't think they're evil. When I first started playing I tried one of the "meta" builds at Megabattle for my Ranger...it was so disastrous that it was almost comical! After a week of that stupidity, I stopped using their build and developed my own build that didn't require me to have my own personal Druid following me around! :D

>

> I'll probably windup using a Greatsword as my main, with the longbow as my secondary.

>

Greatsword and scepter with torch (have to use it since I have Meteorlogicus) and will switch out to longbow depending on circumstances for my Guardian.

As for my Ranger, it's bow and double axes with greatsword as an option.

> @"Arden.7480" said:

> > @"lokh.2695" said:

> > As far as your source goes, it could be anything. Nothing says "GW3" in your source so it is, in fact, speculation and/or wishful thinking.

>

> that's why I used may be,might multiple time

OK, all I can say is LMAO.