Tharan.9085

> @"WillPaharu.4837" said: > Why would you nerf a build that is only ranked "good" (decap druid)? please refer to metabattle.com before nerfing anything. The only classes and builds that should be nerfed are the ones ranked "Meta". Meta means over powered. "Good" means it's not very effective unless played very well. Please undo the nerfs on Decap druid. It is the only druid build and one of the few ranger builds viable in conquest. > > Were people actually complaining about decap druid or something??? If so that is hilarious, feel free to ignore them. Play decap druid yourself and see how not overpowered it is. > > Again, please undo these nerfs to decap druid. Nerf Dragon hunters instead. > > Ideally there would be no meta builds. Just all good and great, so that it comes down to skill and knowing your class and role. When there are meta builds, people flock to them because they are easier to win with. Which is cheap. I digress, as there will always be meta builds I reckon. But pls leave the "good" builds alone. They aren't the imbalance. imagine thinking metabattle is a good source for anything

> @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > @"Tharan.9085" said: > > > @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > > > @"Tharan.9085" said: > > > > > @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > > > > > @"Dawdler.8521" said: > > > > > > > @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > > > > > > To be clear, **this should only apply to the top-rated player on each team**. > > > > > > So together with the enemy, others on the team can deliberately stack kills in order to get a specific player banned for 24h? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cant we just have a vote per match to ban players? It skips the unecessarily complex extra steps. > > > > > > > > > > This is pretty smart tbh. Better than my idea. Most people on here are just criticizing that I included damage in here, not actually discussing it substantively, so I appreciate the response. > > > > > > > > How is that smart, allowing players to vote who to ban is even more stupid > > > > > > How so? You are a very antagonistic person, yet don't actually have anything of substance to say. Unranked is a fine place for people to learn how to play. If we were going to use Dawdler's idea then it would simply keep people so bad their teammates hate them out of Ranked. Then when they get good enough that people aren't going to want to ban them from games, they can play Ranked, no problem. > > > > How do you not see how that could easily get abused at any level to ban better players? > > Because I'm assuming that there would be some safeguards against it. It's not reasonable to assume that, when a system is implemented, the developers will do literally nothing to prevent any problems. This is what I mean when I say you're being antagonistic, you hear a good idea and you think "How can I make this situation as negative as possible and have no faith in anybody?" It's not productive, and it's not nice. yes because anet is known for their good safeguards against any kind of exploit

> @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > @"Tharan.9085" said: > > > @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > > > @"Dawdler.8521" said: > > > > > @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > > > > To be clear, **this should only apply to the top-rated player on each team**. > > > > So together with the enemy, others on the team can deliberately stack kills in order to get a specific player banned for 24h? > > > > > > > > Cant we just have a vote per match to ban players? It skips the unecessarily complex extra steps. > > > > > > This is pretty smart tbh. Better than my idea. Most people on here are just criticizing that I included damage in here, not actually discussing it substantively, so I appreciate the response. > > > > How is that smart, allowing players to vote who to ban is even more stupid > > How so? You are a very antagonistic person, yet don't actually have anything of substance to say. Unranked is a fine place for people to learn how to play. If we were going to use Dawdler's idea then it would simply keep people so bad their teammates hate them out of Ranked. Then when they get good enough that people aren't going to want to ban them from games, they can play Ranked, no problem. How do you not see how that could easily get abused at any level to ban better players?

> @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > @"Dawdler.8521" said: > > > @"Huskyboy.1053" said: > > > To be clear, **this should only apply to the top-rated player on each team**. > > So together with the enemy, others on the team can deliberately stack kills in order to get a specific player banned for 24h? > > > > Cant we just have a vote per match to ban players? It skips the unecessarily complex extra steps. > > This is pretty smart tbh. Better than my idea. Most people on here are just criticizing that I included damage in here, not actually discussing it substantively, so I appreciate the response. How is that smart, allowing players to vote who to ban is even more stupid

Holy shit that's some next level trash ideah

play ranked

That build wouldn't work against anyone with a brain

Got a 56% thief winrate while mainly playing Troll builds

"I'm bad so please make the game more braindead for me"

Everything works in pvp

On my core shatter mesmer I can do 5k crits with shatter without problem

> @"Vancho.8750" said: > > @"Tharan.9085" said: > > > @"NorthernRedStar.3054" said: > > > > @"Tharan.9085" said: > > > > Just get good, I don't have problems landing it > > > > > > > > > > This isn't Open World -forum section, though. > > > > Then why is op crying about missing skillshots? > The guy is playing guardian and generally you don't do much thinking cause its point click adventure, till you use Longbow and bam 3 skills shot skills and a stand on place cast skill that requires positioning, that kitten is hard for the general guard player man. > actually true

> @"NorthernRedStar.3054" said: > > @"Tharan.9085" said: > > Just get good, I don't have problems landing it > > > > This isn't Open World -forum section, though. Then why is op crying about missing skillshots?

Just get good, I don't have problems landing it

I think someone hasnt played symbol monkey in it's prime

> @"Mellow.7409" said: > > @"Widmo.3186" said: > > > @"Mellow.7409" said: > > > > @"Widmo.3186" said: > > > > The ele profession should become more of an ele and less of a support > > > > > > > > Ele is so disgustingly underpowered and even more so since you removed our beloved crowd control damage (besides LR, but it also got nerfed by 33% dmg), FGS isn't even close to being "Elite", Glyph of Elementals _(which should be equivalent to Flesh Golem)_ is a joke and doesn't even turn the tide of a battle in a 1 versus 1 situation. All that we have left of this profession is anti-fun support build which isn't very ele-like if you ask me. > > > > > > Guess you haven't played Tempest nor Weaver. > > > > Guess you haven't played Berserker nor Spellbreaker. > > That's not a valid argument since both Tempest & Weaver are viable even in 1500+. everything is viable 1500+

It actually still deals dmg when you overheat and enter elixir S