Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Professional Player's Analysis of Builds in the Current Meta


Recommended Posts

So I played a few games for the first time since the overhaul patch, and naturally I have mastered every new build out there. Here is my pro analysis of some of the builds I played and fought.

1. Tempest: God tier hovercraft. Much less spinning that weaver, but much more floating. Doesnt really do anything aside from not die and stun a lot.

2. Guard: Still farts out boons everywhere. Then it sits on symbols and does a pve rotation.

3. Necro: Likes to auto attack. Its opponents voluntarily apply fear to themselves when facing lich form.

4. Condi Rev: ??? I cant see what is going on. Unable to perform analysis.

5. Condi thief: Sits in stealth and waits for you to die. Does not require keyboard to play.

6. Holo: More rolling than the roller beetle.

7. Power Herald: Can actually do damage.

8. Daredevil: Can play without having to enter combat.

 

Any other builds were so ineffective I literally didnt even notice them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are a professional player?

What is your wage for playing GW2?

 

That aside, your "analyses" sound more like impressions than actual analyses.

Because, you should know, an analysis is a detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

You neither go for any details, nor do you mention any structure or element.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Fueki.4753" said:

> So you are a professional player?

> What is your wage for playing GW2?

>

> That aside, your "analyses" sound more like impressions than actual analyses.

> Because, you should know, an analysis is a detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

> You neither go for any details, nor do you mention any structure or element.

 

your sarcasm reader is broke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Leonidrex.5649" said:

> > @"Fueki.4753" said:

> > So you are a professional player?

> > What is your wage for playing GW2?

> >

> > That aside, your "analyses" sound more like impressions than actual analyses.

> > Because, you should know, an analysis is a detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

> > You neither go for any details, nor do you mention any structure or element.

>

> your sarcasm reader is broke

 

Sarcasm is a form of communication that needs a shift in the voice to be noticed.

Therefore, it can't properly exist in written form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Fueki.4753" said:

> > @"Leonidrex.5649" said:

> > > @"Fueki.4753" said:

> > > So you are a professional player?

> > > What is your wage for playing GW2?

> > >

> > > That aside, your "analyses" sound more like impressions than actual analyses.

> > > Because, you should know, an analysis is a detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

> > > You neither go for any details, nor do you mention any structure or element.

> >

> > your sarcasm reader is broke

>

> Sarcasm is a form of communication that needs a shift in the voice to be noticed.

> Therefore, it can't properly exist in written form.

 

you must be NA or UK to say that :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Fueki.4753" said:

> So you are a professional player?

> What is your wage for playing GW2?

>

> That aside, your "analyses" sound more like impressions than actual analyses.

> Because, you should know, an analysis is a detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

> You neither go for any details, nor do you mention any structure or element.

 

You are a smart person

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...