PvE Players... Do you think GW 2 would be better without PvP and WvW?

[Ashen.2907]

> @"DarcShriek.5829" said:

> If they remove PvP and WvW, it would reduce GW2's revenue. Reduced revenue means budget cuts. Budget cuts mean layoffs. I say let's keep the devs employed and keep PvP and WvW. It's the most socially responsible option.

 

This.

 

So many people seem to think that removing wvw and pvp would result in more dev resources for pve. When a company downsizes their operations, eliminating revenue sources, they downsize their expenses as well (usually). In this case that would likely mean staff reductions.

[juhani.5361]

Just no. I've only dabbled in PvP and WvW, but both are fun, and an integral part of the game. I PVE 99% of the time, but I'd miss both if they were gone. Variety is awesome-- why would you limit yourself by removing game modes?

[zealex.9410]

I think it would be a waste to not have pvp and large scale pvp such as wvw. Considering the game has combat build for that.

[flog.3485]

If you were to remove WvW and PvP, PvE would just become a huge, horrifying grindfest to account for the loss of the two other game modes. It is impossible to deny the fact that the "no grind" policy is largely supported by the existence of WvW and PvP.

[Lumpy Forehead.2193]

I major in PvE, but after a while it gets boring, so I would like to pvp for a change. Also it feels different fighting bots and real humans, so alternating between them keeps me interested in this game.

[Mordalus.8146]

I’m a fan of all game modes. But I haven’t done much pvp and no wvw due to the current poor state of those game modes. Removing those modes would only enhance pve since dev time could go strictly to pve instead of failing game modes. I would prefer they fix wvw and pvp but that’s not going to happen. In lieu of that, just taking them out of the game would be better.

[Etterwyn.5263]

It would definitely make PVE better, but I also understand that it is necessary to keep them in place.