Azure The Heartless.3261 Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Leaving it here for general comments, maybe it'll turn a gear somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arheundel.6451 Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Nothing that has not been said before hundreds of time and ignored thousand of times by the devs .... The current system feed way more toxicity respect to the previous one, they removed the safety nets from a pvp system that basically based on gambling, you don't know what team you''ll get but you know that your rating depends on their performance : overall it's an awful system and it's no surprise that it failed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Boyer.6524 Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 All of which heavily encourages "eh em" special ways to game the system. All of which can only truly be resolved by -> https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/31128/bring-back-5-man-ranked-que-needs-to-happen-at-this-point-solo-duo-failed#latest Bump it with good feedback and only with good feedback if you believe in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abelisk.4527 Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Will 5-man truly solve Ranked's issues? Why was duo queue voted in in the first place? That being said, team queues in Ranked could be able to serve as pre-built "in-houses" and could spur new pro teams by providing a lot of team practice/coordination. I do agree with team queue but... I still like the video's solution--to reward more generously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Boyer.6524 Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Let's play a game. Let's attempt to fix the broken furniture in a room, while ignoring the elephant that is breaking it. If you want to see ALL of the well discussed points of re-enabling 5 man, read through that thread. That one got pretty elaborate. The ultimate point of bringing up 5 man que in this thread is that, when choosing and playing with an actual solid team, the elo systems begin to much more strongly represent Mr Elo's original vision of gauging raw win rates from a single participant. In that case, that being a single team, who has the same players on it, every time it plays. And of course this isn't even to mention the other things it would immediately fix, like the choice to block match manipulation with a roster of players whom you know are actually trying, **and in general just being allowed a way to be able to play with your friends in a game that is supposed to be a team game to begin.** But, that thread explains it all, no reason to regurgitate it here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megametzler.5729 Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Only with strictly seperated leaderboards please. Then I'd be fine with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allarius.5670 Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 I watched it expecting it to hammer home all the things players think GW2 ranked is doing wrong. Instead I ended up watching a video that largely praises a good deal of what GW2 ranked does right. Huh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now