Jump to content
  • Sign Up

LetoII.3782

Members
  • Posts

    2,480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LetoII.3782

  1. > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > @"LetoII.3782" said:

    > > > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > > > @"LetoII.3782" said:

    > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > > > > > @"LetoII.3782" said:

    > > > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > > > > > > > @"Legendary Defender.5631" said:

    > > > > > > > > Keep complaining its only going to get worse.

    > > > > > > >

    > > > > > > > If people want SB changed, rolling with them and giving Anet the data they need to do it is exactly what everyone should do. We know Anet uses that usage data to make choices.

    > > > > > >

    > > > > > > And we all know ranger is consistently played quite poorly, by the majority of it's users. So every time they look at the stats, they see ranger underperforming and so bad in WvW it's booted from squads. Yet also needs nerfs? xD

    > > > > >

    > > > > > Hey, that's true for every class though ... so the fact is that that baseline is ... scrub level play. The reality is that there isn't a correlation between top level play and class. There are likely the same proportion of good/bad players for every class. If we can see the range in quality of play, so can Anet.

    > > > >

    > > > > Ranger may well be a special case. It's extra friendly to new players with it's pet doing the tanking by default. And, it's seen consistent dislike by the veteran community.. If people want to upgrade to group play they have to drop ranger. So, who's left as ranger mains? Solos and beginners.

    > > > >

    > > > >

    > > >

    > > > Maybe ... but we don't know if it's a special case. There are lots of friendly classes for new players for different reasons we can think of; I don't see any reason to think that ranger is somehow exceptionally aligned so strongly to new players that there is a disproportion of people playing them leading to bad data.

    > >

    > > Once upon a time I might've pointed to the overabundance of bearbows in pve.

    > > But now it's been six years since I did much open world, so that's out. <,<

    >

    > Again, we don't have stats on how many players were playing any particular build then or now, so it's just speculation to claim data Anet might get from a class is not representative of the performance of the class just because we believe something is special about it.

     

    Do you do a celebratory desk dance when you get the last word?

  2. > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > @"LetoII.3782" said:

    > > > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > > > @"LetoII.3782" said:

    > > > > > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > > > > > @"Legendary Defender.5631" said:

    > > > > > > Keep complaining its only going to get worse.

    > > > > >

    > > > > > If people want SB changed, rolling with them and giving Anet the data they need to do it is exactly what everyone should do. We know Anet uses that usage data to make choices.

    > > > >

    > > > > And we all know ranger is consistently played quite poorly, by the majority of it's users. So every time they look at the stats, they see ranger underperforming and so bad in WvW it's booted from squads. Yet also needs nerfs? xD

    > > >

    > > > Hey, that's true for every class though ... so the fact is that that baseline is ... scrub level play. The reality is that there isn't a correlation between top level play and class. There are likely the same proportion of good/bad players for every class. If we can see the range in quality of play, so can Anet.

    > >

    > > Ranger may well be a special case. It's extra friendly to new players with it's pet doing the tanking by default. And, it's seen consistent dislike by the veteran community.. If people want to upgrade to group play they have to drop ranger. So, who's left as ranger mains? Solos and beginners.

    > >

    > >

    >

    > Maybe ... but we don't know if it's a special case. There are lots of friendly classes for new players for different reasons we can think of; I don't see any reason to think that ranger is somehow exceptionally aligned so strongly to new players that there is a disproportion of people playing them leading to bad data.

     

    Once upon a time I might've pointed to the overabundance of bearbows in pve.

    But now it's been six years since I did much open world, so that's out. <,<

  3. > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > @"LetoII.3782" said:

    > > > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > > > @"Legendary Defender.5631" said:

    > > > > Keep complaining its only going to get worse.

    > > >

    > > > If people want SB changed, rolling with them and giving Anet the data they need to do it is exactly what everyone should do. We know Anet uses that usage data to make choices.

    > >

    > > And we all know ranger is consistently played quite poorly, by the majority of it's users. So every time they look at the stats, they see ranger underperforming and so bad in WvW it's booted from squads. Yet also needs nerfs? xD

    >

    > Hey, that's true for every class though ... so the fact is that that baseline is ... scrub level play. The reality is that there isn't a correlation between top level play and class. There are likely the same proportion of good/bad players for every class. If we can see the range in quality of play, so can Anet.

     

    Ranger may well be a special case. It's extra friendly to new players with it's pet doing the tanking by default. And, it's seen consistent dislike by the veteran community.. If people want to upgrade to group play they have to drop ranger. So, who's left as ranger mains? Solos and beginners.

     

     

  4. > @"Obtena.7952" said:

    > > @"Legendary Defender.5631" said:

    > > Keep complaining its only going to get worse.

    >

    > If people want SB changed, rolling with them and giving Anet the data they need to do it is exactly what everyone should do. We know Anet uses that usage data to make choices.

     

    And we all know ranger is consistently played quite poorly, by the majority of it's users. So every time they look at the stats, they see ranger underperforming and so bad in WvW it's booted from squads. Yet also needs nerfs? xD

  5. > @"displayname.8315" said:

    > Never played wow but the PvP looks cool. Guys think classic will be worth a subscription in August? Warmode or whatever looks cool and assume some guilds are basically fights guilds or hope so.

     

    You'll find WoW's combat to be a regression after gw2. No Dodge, much less value for teamwork other than healer+dps and as pure open world, better take a month off work to level cuz the twinks they are a'comin fast.

  6. > @"Teek.2176" said:

    >. Is there a server that has more people that PvP or WvW?

     

    Hold onto your transfer bucks until you have a firmer grasp of how things work around here. Who's where and doing what changes every few months and the next cycle starts in two weeks.

     

    ~ Kovu

     

     

     

  7. > @"getalifeturd.8139" said:

    > > @"LetoII.3782" said:

    > > > @"getalifeturd.8139" said:

    > > > All I know is real life gives much more of an adrenaline rush from extreme sports like skateboarding

    > >

    > > Get back to us when you're in your 40's and every injury comes back to visit permanently like a broke relative.

    > >

    > >

    >

    > I wear knee pads, elbow pads, wrist guards and a helmet. Also I stretch before I skateboard and eat healthy and sleep well. Problem?

     

    Nah no problem, enjoy it while you can!

    But I speak from first hand experience, your joints remember the impacts.

  8. > @"Anput.4620" said:

     

    > Many specs are way better than soulbeast for 1v1, but it sounds like this is not about balance in fights but the fact that soulbeast may have a chance of dismounting someone, unlike those even more broken builds, so poeple come complain about soulbeast and not those others as they just walk past those.

     

    You hit the nail on the head, but what did you expect?

    Most of the people who wanted to do anything other than find a big blob to hide in are long gone.

  9. > @"trueanimus.4085" said:

    > No offense but it seems you need a new PC. The game is perfectly fine for me... 100+ people in one area... all on mounts.. no problems with full graphics and costumes.. i770 16g ram 1060 geforce

     

    You're full of it.

    Nobody runs full graphics in WvW. I have a better machine than yours and anything above low character count makes it catatonic.

×
×
  • Create New...