LetoII.3782

> @"Lowen.8157" said:

> 1) do what they pay you for,

> 2) don't talk bad about the company you work for

> 3) don't talk bad about the company's clients

>

Ima add a few

4) Don't bring your personal problems to work

5) Don't share your ideas on politics or religion

6) You might _think_ the customer is wrong.....

That twitter account is a veritable cringefest

If you cut a worm in half, you technically get two worms...

> @"Kolzi.5928" said:

> The hooting masses win again. Clearly her actions were inappropriate but was it worth destroying the livelihoods of two people? Don't worry MO, I don't blame you, I blame the cretins who were swarming all over this calling for it.

Do you work?

Call up one of your employer's clients and give 'em a good piece of your mind..... Record and broadcast on a public venue.

Are we talking content per dollar?

Because PoF was less expensive

> @"Loosmaster.8263" said:

> > @"Jay.3409" said:

> > > @"hunkamania.7561" said:

> > > Join Molassas guild Cook. :)

> >

> > who do i contact?

>

> Cook is on Magumma unless they moved.

Cook is on SoS as of last Sunday.

And OP should really experience the excellence.

> @"Phelar.1627" said:

> Can we please get some type of title of the the world were on currently when this changes. I've been on the same server since Early access and would like to have something to represent that.

I agree, and the title should be "cheapskate"

> @"Israel.7056" said:

> No one is forcing players to blob up under one commander.

And besides that, multiple commanders could still stack, it happens every week.

OP you're trying to treat a symptom, it makes sense to clump up in GW2 because of the AoE cap. It allows the blob to share damage amongst the whole group, the larger the clump the less likelihood any one player will get struck twice. It's a major flaw of the game.

And how would Anet even go about _forcing_ commander presence, random chance? The entire concept of this thread is ludicrous.

Only 70% scourgeses in this blob time to ragelog

No fair guys, BG _was_ dying.

But as usual through hard work and superior gameplay all their fairweathers rematerialized from oblivion.

Nobody could have forseen

> @"GDchiaScrub.3241" said:

> TAKE THAT...JUSTICE SYSTEM!

>

> D:

You mean the Just Gaile System, right?

Vabbi sounds more Kaineng than Maguuma. Mag is a retirement community and stockyard, Kaining is the srsbsns must-win alliance dry run at present.

You missed the show

Blackgate had the best everything 'til a month ago. Then, it all vanished like an arrow cart blueprint thrown on the outer edge of a rampart.

> @"hunkamania.7561" said:

> 2020. they prob got 1 dev working on it.

Nah, Ben says he's got a fren. It's always "we"

But I suppose it might be an imaginary one because he's allllll alone down in the Anet basement and it's scary down there.

> @"babazhook.6805" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > @"babazhook.6805" said:

> >

> > > Going to an enemy tower and taking out a treb is offense. It faster using an AC then a balli.

> >

> > Completely false

> > Just like the hammer weilding burn guardians. Why do you keep making these rediculous claims?

> >

>

> What are you on about? Taking out a treb at swt takes all of one AC and two people to build. It next to impossible for the enemy player to take it out from that tower. when you get one down below unless he comes down to get you.

You didn't mention swt in your first post but so be it.

It's faster to eliminate that treb from the arena with a ballista.

> Why do you suggest otherwise if you have not tried it

Did you think this was a new discovery? It's a 5 year old tactic.

and what does this have to do with a Guardian?

That was about you giving hairbrained build advice to new players about a class you hadn't even played. I don't forget, apparently you do. I also recall you advocating no endure pain on warrior.. A veritible wellspring of bad ideas and common knowledge.

> You can build a balli in those ruins but if the enemy is throwing one up as well he can get it up faster while staying IN The tower and take your balli out. A Balli is harder to place so as to be able to hit an AC below .

An AC by the trebs counters your AC below in addition to player skills which can hit it, the ballista is successful more often. Also 5 year old knowledge.

> Another tip, some people put up Trebs in SWC etc to hit bay. If there no countertreb able to reach you can take it out , very often with a Mortar while using the incendiary component while the Damage component does not work because the damage bit has to be dead on and the treb can be just out of range. This works remarkabley well when the enemy using Shield gens as well. I have seen people pull off a mortar using the blast version because "they can not hit the target" and swapped to incendiary and taken the target down. This also helps to flush the enemy out of the area of their trebs/gens allowing others to get in closer and wreck them.

>

> This also works with Cows. A slow process to be sure but if you do have a counter treb up on the wall in Bay you very often can not reach the Treb in SWT. Switch to cow and the AOE can catch it.

A VERITIBLE WELLSPRING

> @"Dawdler.8521" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > @"babazhook.6805" said:

> >

> > > Going to an enemy tower and taking out a treb is offense. It faster using an AC then a balli.

> >

> > Completely false

> > Just like the hammer weilding burn guardians. Why do you keep making these rediculous claims?

> >

>

> Its sort of true though, its much faster to take out a treb using the outer edge of AC AoE than it is using a ballista that cant possibly hit the treb no matter where you place it.

>

> There are only a couple towers where a ballista can hit trebs.

So ballistae that can't hit their target do less damage than an ac that can.

<,<

Learned my new thing for the day

> @"babazhook.6805" said:

> Going to an enemy tower and taking out a treb is offense. It faster using an AC then a balli.

Completely false

Just like the hammer weilding burn guardians. Why do you keep making these rediculous claims?

> @"Elmo Benchwarmer.3025" said:

> That feeling when there are so many immunities no one knows anymore where they are coming from.

They should call the next expac that

> @"Basharic.1654" said:

> > @"babazhook.6805" said:

>

> > **_Where do you get that WvW should be about large scale PvP? That an opinion and one not supported by the fact that there arekeeps towers and castles in the first place. _**Added to that if you play on a server that always has the numbers your experience different then those that do not. Again there persons that drop down tiers just because they do not like the large Scale WvW fights and prefer fights where smaller numbers involved.

>

>

> And there it is folks . . . apparently the only game mode designed for large scale PvP isn't about large scale PvP.

You knew it was there, just below what was actually being typed.

> @"Artaz.3819" said:

> > @"Optimator.3589" said:

> > If the current Mag situation(locked/no link/no coverage) continues after this Friday's relink, I'll probably be buying into CU beta. None of the other servers on NA appeal to me, and the status quo is boring AF.

>

> You need to do some research on the guy in charge of that, Mark Jacobs, and where he takes MMOs and what he does to the dev teams after product launch. Sad, sad, infuriating, sad track record.

Pfft watch a video about who made your phone. I want to see what a PvE-less rpg looks like. Jacobs record isn't perfect, but he doesn't make WoW clones. That alone is a long overdue step for the whole genre.

> @"Strider Pj.2193" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > @"XenesisII.1540" said:

> > > Damnit I thought the plan was to stack kaineng if we didn't get a link.

> > > No one ever gets me the updated memos.

> >

> > Kaineng totally last months flavor.

> > Only Indo knows where the locusts land next... And possibly Cel.

> >

>

> Kitten.., I THOUGHT I heard freakin wings...

Sign of the times

> @"XenesisII.1540" said:

> Damnit I thought the plan was to stack kaineng if we didn't get a link.

> No one ever gets me the updated memos.

Kaineng totally last months flavor.

Only Indo knows where the locusts land next... And possibly Cel.

> @"Optimator.3589" said:

> the status quo is boring AF.

^

And Fortnite?

Not even curious?

I haven't even mentioned non-mmo's like Total Warhammer that have hot multiplayer ATM... Just why exactly would the community/game NOT offering what I seek get my contnued attention? Same for the rest of the actual pvp-oriented pvp'rs

> @"GDchiaScrub.3241" said:

> > @"Strider Pj.2193" said:

> > > @"Ben Phongluangtham.1065" said:

> > > > @"Spurnshadow.3678" said:

> > > > > @"Ben Phongluangtham.1065" said:

> > > > > Hey folks!

> > > > >

> > > > > A few weeks ago we gathered some feedback on the current state of siege weapons. We've gone through the feedback and have come up with a list of changes. The changes below are the first group of them. We may do additional changes down the line, but these were some of the quickest we could do (didn't require new code/UI). Feedback is welcome!

> > > > >

> > > > > * You can no longer be hit more than once every .5 seconds by arrow cart attacks.

> > > > > * Arrow Cart damage against siege has been reduced by 50%.

> > > > > * The number of targets that can be hit by one arrow cart attack has been reduced from 50 to 25.

> > > > > * Shield generators can no longer put domes on other shield generators.

> > > > > * Shield generator domes no longer destroy unblockable projectiles.

> > > > > * Burning Oil Mastery 3 now also reduces condition damage. Damage reduction for both direct damage and conditions has been increased from 33% to 66%.

> > > > > * Catapult Gravel shot now shoots projectiles in a fan shape.

> > > > > * Updated Ballistas to make them more reliable.

> > > > > * Slowed the velocity of Ballista's Greater Reinforced shot to give it an arc. This should make it easier to hit stationary targets (siege).

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > While I don't disagree with these changes, when was this feedback requested? I never remember it, and I'm an avid forum watcher. Was it in the forums? Reddit, cause, I never read that and it's not the official GW2 forums? Was it just in game? What? Again, good changes, just the feedback thing I have an issue with.

> > >

> > > It was this thread from a few weeks ago. Not sure how you missed it!

> > >

> > > https://en-forum.guildwars2.com/discussion/40496/siege-revisions/p1

> > >

> >

> > In all fairness Ben, it was only 14 pages long... :grimace:

>

> And it was closed. :3

Many passionate discusses!

> @"Strider Pj.2193" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > @"Strider Pj.2193" said:

> > > > @"Israel.7056" said:

> > > > > @"Strider Pj.2193" said:

> > > > > > @"Israel.7056" said:

> > > > > > > @"Shining One.1635" said:

> > > > > > >Why not split up so you can fight each other? Wouldn't you get the constant NA fights you want that way?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I don't like fighting my friends. I like to fight people that I hate and I hate pretty much every other server.

> > > > >

> > > > > But yet, there is no one left to fight because no other server fights?

> > > >

> > > > More like the culture on every other server has become so objective oriented that most fights are predicated on an objective being on the line instead of just kinda running into each other over and over in an open area. There are plenty of people to fight and plenty of people who know how to fight but more and more they'll only fight if some kind of objective is on the line. That's what I really hate about most other servers on NA. It's not that they're all that bad at the game it's that they consistently make choices on the field that I absolutely despise and I refuse to be a part of.

> > > >

> > > > Take BG for example. Lot of very experienced pugs, some great commanders, can easily just focus on fighting whenever they want to, frequently choose to play the ppt siege turtle game instead. Why? Because too many people got obsessed with the idea of being the server that wins matchups instead of being the server that just wins fights. I remember when BG server culture wasn't so different from how Mag is now. I loved BG back then somewhere along the way it just got corrupted with this obsession with winning the stupid matchups.

> > >

> > > And if it's truly 'every other server' why does Mag bother then? By that definition, there is no one to fight.

> >

> > Mag isn't

> > People are calling it quits. Hence t4

> >

> > Keep debating whether I should wait for CU or get some fortnight while it's hot myself.

>

> When it finally comes out in 2020, let me know if it's worth it.

Lol

No leveling process, right into the action. Same with crowfall.

The month wasted leveling has always been what held me back from New titles.

Why not give it a whirl?