Jump to content
  • Sign Up

LetoII.3782

Members
  • Posts

    2,480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LetoII.3782

  1. > @"Eater of Peeps.9062" said:

    >

    > Can't Anet and the community think of something better ?

    Can't you?

     

    As to the rest, if you simply cannot find any group to suit you, one will be assigned. Pugs will be the mortar between the stones (guilds) evening things out. It seems a better situation than the dogpile on the winner situation we've had since launch.

    Heck, back at launch guilds like the one I was in routinely had to move just to play. You bought the game, so did I.. is the group of purchasers less than the one?

    Does your desire to be on the winning server mean I have to move ahead of the queues you create after my group boosted that server into a good position?

     

  2. > @"Dreggon.6598" said:

    > well here's a dumb idea i threw together

    >

    > make all structures invulnerable except the main one in each map - SMC in EB, and the garrisons in each borderlands, would be the only vulnerable structures

    >

    > while you're inside one of those contested structures that your team owns, you get drip-fed WXP and reward track progress. the goal is to capture those structures so you get the gradual rewards, and defend them so you don't lose those rewards.

    >

    > i haven't thought it through any more than this, if you like it then great

     

    A de facto King of the Hill

    I dig it

  3. > @"Jumpin Lumpix.6108" said:

     

    > People who are for this change don't care about pugs or anything they might want at all. This will destroy server identity completely which is like telling someone from wow, there is no horde or alliance anymore, it's gamebreaking.

     

    No, it won't destroy server identity. As I pointed out, there will still be a BG... The only change will be which pugs it has during NA, which is your complaint. You won't be able to identify as the winner (with no further investment on your part) going forward. Pugs will now be actual pick-up groups, a balancing mechanic, instead of a casual way of joining the currently winning group.

     

     

  4. What's in a name?

     

    The server is a community of people.

    Alliances will be the same, with more imput from the community itself as to who composes that community.

     

    There will still be a BG... The whole ocx community won't fill half an alliance, there will be room for a big sea group too.

     

    I think Lupin is NA, knows NA doesn't matter much, there is always plenty to go around. So the new BG isn't likely to have a spot for his like. :(

  5. It seems really unlikely they'll buff true shot tbh. (Not that it doesn't need it.) Because it was hammered down to where it is recently, and it'd seem like a regression to roll those nerfs back.

    As to what else could be buffed.... Heck ToF gets whined about too... And that's the problem really, DH is those two things essentialy and the general community howled for nerf after nerf, and got them.

  6. > @"Ragnarox.9601" said:

    > tome skills have cd's, internal cd's, casting times...

    >

    > I am for bigger cd's but they need to change them into kits then, and I am for that, bigger cd-better effect.

     

    Agreed, let me stow and use on demand but use less.

    It's too much of a buff to zergs but near useless solo as is, just like scourge.

×
×
  • Create New...