LetoII.3782

> @"ArchonWing.9480" said:

> Also why do we need to type to destroy the damned things?

This right here.

I keep a burner toon for all the undeletables. Stack em full and once a year he and all the crap goes poof

> @"knite.1542" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > Would instantly obsolete all superior siege.

> >

> >

>

> Is that an issue? Sometimes things become obsolete. Making positive changes shouldn't be avoided because it will make something else obsolete. At least in my opinion.

Well, by myself I keep a guild of 20 active players furnished with enough guild siege to have a surplus. Frequently, we'll find ourselves just shy of what's needed due to their only being 3-5 of us online. While I'm sure the bigger guilds would also like access to the cheaper supply cost (and they do, just not at scale), they tend to have no issue building a half dozen superior rams or catapults with a side of shield generators. They'll also do so at structure after structure over the course of a raid. By design, guild siege isn't supposed to be unlimited access. Before HoT you only got a handful of pieces _a week_. It's for special use, somewhat rare and as mentioned above a way to turn some time into gold. Removing the limited queue would simply be a pointless buff to the people who need their supply the least and turn a rare item to a common one.

> @"TheGrimm.5624" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > Would instantly obsolete all superior siege.

>

> As long as they can be listed on the TP, GS already makes superior obsolete in the same manner. Don't have time, you buy them. It just punishes the crafter's time. If you still want a time gate, go with the mass queuing system above.

Sweat equity has value.

You're not being punished for stopping by the guild hall to press a button 11 times, youre adding nonmonetary worth to ghetto siege. As you said yourself, lacking the time or motivation it can simply be purchased.

Would instantly obsolete all superior siege.

Only reason i bought the other two was the power creep

> @"Jilora.9524" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > @"Jilora.9524" said:

> > > > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > > Years of shadowplay and still the same bs.

> > > > No, youre not outnumbered, youre outgunned. Now go hide on a borderland

> > >

> > > You always chime in with some toxic hide on BL or stop complaining while you hug t3 SMC. Now which diamond hunt ranger are you? There's 3 but only one is in a constant state of backpeddle always staying exactly 1650 range away even when you outnumber and always ready to retreat into SMC. Most like to play all aspects of the mode not just hump SMC all day

> >

> > Funny how smc has expended all the way to your spawn over the years. Dont pick on our pet boomer he's like 70

>

> I'm not sos if that was a ref to this week. I'm not trying to pick on anyone. You just always make a comment I can't resist responding too

We've had your keep as well. I knew you were nsp because the text isnt upside down

> @"Jilora.9524" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > Years of shadowplay and still the same bs.

> > No, youre not outnumbered, youre outgunned. Now go hide on a borderland

>

> You always chime in with some toxic hide on BL or stop complaining while you hug t3 SMC. Now which diamond hunt ranger are you? There's 3 but only one is in a constant state of backpeddle always staying exactly 1650 range away even when you outnumber and always ready to retreat into SMC. Most like to play all aspects of the mode not just hump SMC all day

Funny how smc has expended all the way to your spawn over the years. Dont pick on our pet boomer he's like 70

Years of shadowplay and still the same bs.

No, youre not outnumbered, youre outgunned. Now go hide on a borderland

Gonna point out your opponents next time someone talks about how skillful EU is

> @"diomache.9246" said:

> While your "view" on the game mode is based on your experiences and only those you believe your knowledge is greater than from developers that have your data and that from some hundred thousands others and do that for a living while you work in barber shop?

>

You should really lay off posting about this until you've watched a few dev streams.

I cant even tell you how disenchanting watching Karl try to play Dragonhunter was..

Clear is the best color.

People never get done whining about them clear color guys

> @"Heibi.4251" said:

> > @"Dagger.2035" said:

> > Tier 4 NA may be a mess due to a certain server tanking...

> >

>

> We've made plans for that. They won't be happy

Is it to send wave after wave until the whole server reaches it's preset kill limit?

> @"Doug.4930" said:

> I think OP shot themselves in the foot by using an example that's greatly exaggerated.

>

> But that doesn't detract from the fact that minstrel support pocket healers do provide way too much to any squad that they are apart off. Roaming/small scale/large scale. Too many heals, too many cleanses and too many boons.

>

> No other build can so drastically affect the outcome of a fight than a pocket minstrel support build that's played with even a semblance of mediocrity.

Well, yeah.

Kinda hard to go from 3 actions to 24 without some power creep, not much to be done about it now except bring your own stabobot.

19 people attacking the ground in front of their feet and one OP wondering how they're doing less damage than him.

Get shadowplay, record a fight. People doing absolutely nothing is abysmally common in this game.

Its so common that Anet made scourge so people could win by standing next to an opponent.

Personally I think OP is right, Anet should demote him for losing to a noobie

No platinum warrior should be leaving such a heavy salt trail

> @"Calisanna.8732" said:

> I buy a new account when on sale to have options for coverage hours.

Attitudes like this are why the whole concept of alliances was pointless, people will find a way to game any system.. The only real solution is to disincentivize creating population imbalances in the first place.

The goal seems to be nothing short of sweeping every last obstacle from the zergs path.

What's next, uninterruptable rezzes?

> @"Psycoprophet.8107" said:

> > @"Justine.6351" said:

> > > @"GROMIT.7829" said:

> > > Sup my dude, WvW has been abandoned again and the little they do do is simply to stem the whining in their eyes.

> > >

> > > Can't wait for Guild Wars 3 to come out with no World Vs World because you can gauntee they don't want that headache.

> >

> > Gw3 would go back to the gw1 party format probably, we'll IF done "right".

>

> Given the lack of development and support not to mention passion anet has had for gw2 in last couple years I doubt gw3 will be a thing, I'd guess a completely different game probably of a different genre is probably where anets heads are at.

NCsoft seems to have taken more direct control after Mike O'Brien left.

MMORPG's are NCsoft's thing. I kinda think it's the future in non-MMO's that left with Mike.

> @"Teratus.2859" said:

> > @"Dawdler.8521" said:

> > > @"Teratus.2859" said:

> > > Will new world have a mandatory sub? if so i won't even bother with a free trail.

> > Its b2p like GW2, but of course we have no idea what their cashshop will ultimately look like. Being backed by the huge cash cow amazon I wouldnt expect anything *too* egregious, but then again if you look at tencent backed games...

> >

>

> Oh Tencent is involved with it?

> In that case I want nothing to do with it.

No, it's an Amazon title.

Tencent was used as an example of _worse than_

> @"XenesisII.1540" said

>

> Also cleanses are like the last thing that needs a buff right now, there's an over abundance of it in the game from multiple classes.

^

The game engine doesn't care if you have a condi or a boon. It only cares if _something changed_.

All the little side-effects that have been added to everyones skills and utilities, all the constantly changing statuses that have to be calculated and everyone updated about, those are what bog the server down.

> @"Dawdler.8521" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > They need another year to fix up the fail.

> > Honestly it's for the best.

> I wonder if they even can recover. They have to build up alot of hype in that year and honestly, I cant imagine that happening. People are already not interested anymore.

>

Heck if CU can still get a glance, NW can.

I'm glad Crucible happened soon enough for them to internalize what making blah also-rans is worth in market share.

They need another year to fix up the fail.

Honestly it's for the best.

Why not chaaarge!?

They're the content becaus it's that or nothing

> @"aaron.7850" said:

> 60% damage nerf and yet they will still do more damage than mesmers, thieves, rangers... etc.

> This is balancing, learn to live with it.

> @"RisenHowl.2419" said

> more than mesmers sure, definitely less than thieves and rangers.

I guess we'll have videos of you topping your arcdps on thief and ranger to look forward to