LetoII.3782

Why is called dargonbash when there's no dargons?

I tried it yesterday just out of curiosity, the whole deal I was thinking so dargons now?... Nop hologram. K dargon now?.. Nop more hologram. K dargon now?...

> @"Jilora.9524" said:

> The votes seem to favor we want them but yes you can see the future.

Your biased poll netted a slightly positive result with 59 respondents.

Sit down

> @"Dawdler.8521" said:

> > @"Sovereign.1093" said:

> > Mmmm body block. Pirate ship time. Bring out the billions of rangers

> Yeah I can imagine it.

>

> Frontline: **"FORM A LINE!"**

> Backline: **"UNLEASH THE ARROWS!"**

> Frontline: *Slowly turns around to look at the backline* **"Are you kitten kidding me with this kitten"** *Falls over dead from a billion arrows in the back*

>

Well, in Total War games good 'ol Roman triplex aices work that way, set up small gaps between your melee units for ranged to fire between. Shouldn't be that hard for a commander to arrange...

> @"Ubi.4136" said:

>

> Please stop necro'ing this thread.

Necro implies it's left the front page at some point in it's 2.5 year history.

My expectations were low but holy pete

> @"Jabronee.9465" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > @"Jabronee.9465" said:

> > > Cmon brah GW2 players aint fools.

> >

> > We never stop hearing about thief's need for nerfs, but on an average map there's a dozen necros per thief. Must be _some_ explanation why people choose the weaker class...

>

> Isn't it obvios why we cant see the thieves? (facepalm)

Your teammates are also invisible to you?

Facepalm indeed.

> And its obvious too why we could see dozens of necros too as they are needed for blobs especially.

And why are they needed?

Just what is it that they bring to the table?

Careful now...

> @"Jabronee.9465" said:

> Cmon brah GW2 players aint fools.

We never stop hearing about thief's need for nerfs, but on an average map there's a dozen necros per thief. Must be _some_ explanation why people choose the weaker class...

> @"Jabronee.9465" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > If they're so overpowered why are there so few left playing?

> >

> > Must be an honor thing.

>

> Not an honor thing to me. Maybe for most thieves as they find great honor in using Stealth as an advantage for success.

> I play my DE not for honor. I play it cause i have no choice but to abuse the stealth plus high mobilities and of course high dps. In short its not high risk high reward class if you play it more. Its the opposite.

> I love playing Necro in every mmos but I'm forced by Anet to play thieves due to its mechanics.

> O trust me we are around mostly unseen ofc lol. Depends of which servers they are on and time.

Pfft I meant all those people who know how overpowered thief is but choose to make poor, weak Necro variants the most played class in WvW.

I like how PR mouthpieces that have nothing to do with alliances keep mentioning them, passing the stinky hot potato back to the devs who wish it'd just go away xD

This guy is a pvp God, y'all not getting it.

Nobody should be beating him /thread

I still maintain it's an idiot test build. But sadly that's all it takes to be strong now.

If they're so overpowered why are there so few left playing?

Must be an honor thing.

> @"Aeolus.3615" said:

>

> slayers[XD]

>

Ah, ok.

I was just confused about who this guild I thought we hadn't faced on nsp was.

> @"Aeolus.3615" said:

> My group(the builds we test n run) we can manage to get 15-20 stacks of stab, we can reach 10-15 with just 2 players.

>

You keep mentioning your high performance group, and I know you're on nsp. Would you mind giving a guild name?

> @"XenesisII.1540" said:

> An update... not on wvw... ok a different wvw... ok not a different wvw... the wvw killer! finally! after all these years!... ok no not really...

>

>

This made me sad.

All that money and they still couldn't take a chance and break the mold.

> @"Rakan Buuyon.8576" said:

> Mags commanders

Whoops!

You got caught.

I suppose Indo logged out after an hour because he got tired of all the winning.

> @"Rakan Buuyon.8576" said:

> Except not really. TpW broke off into two groups to try and spread Mag out to be more manageable, but no one was PPTing. That was farming. We spent like almost 2 hours just fighting in front of SMC.

Is it really farming when you end up negative kdr?

That look the Devs get whenever someone mentions alliances in their stream

> @"Jayden Reese.9542" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > @"Jayden Reese.9542" said:

> >

> > > I also think you must be parroting this thread to your discord as inspiration because you guys working overtime to ppt now.

> >

> > Indo's marathon barely managed to catch them up.

> > 115/116/117 with SoS about to go to sleep in their upside down beds and Indo at work :(

> > ..for the people that care about score naturally, not me <,<

>

> When does indo play? I assumed it was NA prime not rocking a huge sea timezone zerg or maybe he just 16 hour marathons and is the reincarnation of DK I think was his name years ago.

East coast timezone employed adult.

Extrapolate from there.

That DK guy was basement-dweller level xD

> @"Jayden Reese.9542" said:

> I also think you must be parroting this thread to your discord as inspiration because you guys working overtime to ppt now.

Indo's marathon barely managed to catch them up.

115/116/117 with SoS about to go to sleep in their upside down beds and Indo at work :(

..for the people that care about score naturally, not me <,<

> @"ArchonWing.9480" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > > @"ArchonWing.9480" said:

> >

> > It doesn't matter if your CPU is bathed in liquid nitrogen, Space Invaders is gonna run at the same speed it did on equipment in 1981

>

> kitten but I want that Space Invaders FPS though!

>

> But yea, this is also why I don't want people to spend $2000 just so Gw2 can allegedly run faster-- that's just inane.

>

To further elaborate for doubters..

Remember the Bitcoin mining craze a few years back? When gpu's were selling for 150-200% of their market value and you _still_ couldn't find one?

My wife's card burnt out.

We both had gtx660ti's prior, we had to grab what was on the shelf at our local BestBuy, A measly little gt740.. Garbage card.

Made no difference whatsoever for GW2.

> @"Sovereign.1093" said:

> > @"aleron.1438" said:

> > Wouldn't GeForce Now offer a valid alternative option for those playing on laptops?

>

> Yes, but only to countries it is available to. :/

You're also subject to your isp's internet streaming limits doing that.

Not worked out so great for stadia.

You can make a machine that plays this game (at the game's limitations) for $500

> @"Jayden Reese.9542" said:

> > @"LetoII.3782" said:

> > How does looking for fights jive with rolling around in a massive lag inducing boon ball?

> > The game barely even functions in that state yet people claim to be doing it for fun.

>

> No one wants fair fights man. They look for fights they can win or smaller forces they can steamroll. just like if you one of those hunt diamond pew pewers you never alone and do the same thing on a smaller scale.

And we never leave SMC, we always cheese, there isn't 3 members dueling 75% of the time they're online and we always have a blob right around the corner from us, at least flesh the list out. We both know very well what Indo's blob is up to. They want to win, but monoblobbing is a terrible way to accomplish anything scorewise. If they really wanted fights they'd find far more groups at half their size. To say they want fights in lag with nearly no groups that can match their size is laughable.

That's not MY issue, it's the lag. Is not dying _really_ worth the terrible gaming experience?

How does looking for fights jive with rolling around in a massive lag inducing boon ball?

The game barely even functions in that state yet people claim to be doing it for fun.

> @"ArchonWing.9480" said:

> Btw is any of this true?

Certainly makes one.. Cautious when every comment is "I'm not sure what I'm doing, but"

I can't help but think it's a placebo effect when no _real_ computer guys recommend.

The real guys I know keep telling me 30fps in a blob is as good as it gets, engine limitations.

It doesn't matter if your CPU is bathed in liquid nitrogen, Space Invaders is gonna run at the same speed it did on equipment in 1981

> @"Faenar.8036" said:

> Collision detection in GW2? Haha, imagine the instant kitten-storm tears flood in PvE forum section. Any boss fight where even a tiny fraction would require even a slight movement to avoid high-damage boss AoE would became totaly imposible.

You mean the world bosses where most players just facetank everything, res each other faster than the boss can kill them and everything always turns out fine because it's only meant to seem difficult?