Khalisto.5780
-
Posts
1,038 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Articles
Gallery
Posts posted by Khalisto.5780
-
-
> @"Fueki.4753" said:
> > @"Khalisto.5780" said:
> > Real ppl dont play 14 hours day for 45 consecutive days
> Due to the pandemic and many people are unable to do their jobs and have much more free time than before, while also having nothing better to do than binging video games. Therefore, I think that playing 14 hours a day for multiple weeks isn't too unrealistic anymore.
>
>
When i farmed my legendary back i dropped to silver and then i really knew all this bot thing
I got 2 of those on camera, they stopped working when timer went to 0 in 2v2 seasons, funny enough 90% of all other accounts I added to my friendlist with "weird behaviour" have right now 500 ish matches played, while the highest humans are 200 ish, while average is 100.
I don't know if you can pm ppl on this forums but i could send you all those accounts so you can check them yourself
-
Yes hackers mau eventually come back
But imagine if they took less than 24 hours to ban an accout
Itd be very discouraging to hack or bot, i think 3 timea it would be enough for most of them to give up
-
> @"Filip.7463" said:
> > @"Khalisto.5780" said:
> > > @"Filip.7463" said:
> > > > @"Nightcore.5621" said:
> > > > > @"Filip.7463" said:
> > > > > Most of bots are real players.
> > > > > Pls stop spamming bot topics on forum and exit that g1
> > > >
> > > > 100s of post eveyday about bots.. U know maby there's something about it?
> > >
> > > There are some bots but no one cares cuz they are only in g1
> > > Players in plat dont meet them
> >
> > That is not a smart think
> >
> > In any game the base of the pyramid is broader than top
> >
> > If this ppl stop playing before they get good you have no community growth
> >
> > In fact, in this state of the game all things should be thought first for begginers. Since game has nearly no competitive scene i see very little value making things for top players
>
> Most of that “bots” are real people. Because they get called a bot, they dont like playing pvp. Easy as that
Real ppl dont play 14 hours day for 45 consecutive days
-
> @"Filip.7463" said:
> > @"Nightcore.5621" said:
> > > @"Filip.7463" said:
> > > Most of bots are real players.
> > > Pls stop spamming bot topics on forum and exit that g1
> >
> > 100s of post eveyday about bots.. U know maby there's something about it?
>
> There are some bots but no one cares cuz they are only in g1
> Players in plat dont meet them
That is not a smart think
In any game the base of the pyramid is broader than top
If this ppl stop playing before they get good you have no community growth
In fact, in this state of the game all things should be thought first for begginers. Since game has nearly no competitive scene i see very little value making things for top players
-
> @"Solanum.6983" said:
> They said they're working on better ways to detect and prevent cheating from bettering the report system to preventing what they can from a code level.
>
> It's a problem in any Free to play game, If a Hacker is banned they just create a new account and the cycle continues, Hopefully the upcoming changes can mitigate it.
Dunno why ppl blame on f2p, i heard 3 ppl talking about same hacker, guess what, he was playing scourge, most bots are scourges as well
Ive seen 5 bots so far playing f2p 3 wars and 2 guards, they all play hammer builds
Another guy known for botting plays scourge on his TWENTY accounts
-
The contant stealth and the survivability it provides is what annoys me the most in thia build, too much potential of reseting fights
-
> @"saerni.2584" said:
> > @"Khalisto.5780" said:
> > I played against the same guy, got it on camera, submitted a ticket, reported in game a posted it on forums.
> >
> > My post was removed because "accusing" another player is agaisnt the rule.
> >
> > Funny enough i wasn't accusing I was proving he was hacking, but apparently both things seems to be the same to anet.
>
> Naming and shaming is something they don't want to happen so it's forbidden on these forums.
>
> Submitting proof of hacking may or may not "work." Just because you don't see a hacker again doesn't mean they were banned. And, just because you see a hacker again doesn't mean they weren't banned.
>
> The biggest issue is that people expect perma bans but Anet doesn't actually issue that many perma bans (and that doesn't stop them from getting new accounts). And there's no system in game for Anet to flag an account as one that was banned for hacking at some point.
>
> Anet could add a badge to all characters on an account for a period of time if they determine the person was hacking. That way, even if they let the person back in game other people would have a sense that the hacker had been caught previously and was on Anet's radar.
>
> But that's not likely because Anet doesn't see much value in shaming people who cheat. That's a choice I neither agree nor disagree with. 99% of players aren't hacking so I still can enjoy the game.
My point was never shaming, but show those things are actually there.
A lot of people deny the existance of such things, and it's not hard to find those here on forums.
Before this i think i have seen 1 bot since 2012, but now it was 3 last 2-3 weeks
Pvp is great, i still have fun but it's neven been worst
-
So you lost, and think the problem was class stack?
-
> @"Ayrilana.1396" said:
> > @"phokus.8934" said:
> > If they restricted f2p accounts to unranked only then this would solve a lot in the short term.
>
> You’re basing this on what? We as players can not determine whether someone is a F2P or not so I’m confused how you’re able to determine that all of the bots are F2P accounts.
If theyre using elite specs it means they are not f2p
-
> @"Avatar.3568" said:
> > @"Nightcore.5621" said:
> > > @"Leonidrex.5649" said:
> > > > @"Nightcore.5621" said:
> > > > Players that dont do TOURNAMENTS and have spend thousands of hours in ranked need something to work forward to. I suggest that you add these Crowns / Gizmos to a vendor that sells them for maby 10000 Ascended Shards of Glory or whatever. I really enjoy the gamemode but the motivation to play it when there nothing long time goal to work forward to really makes it hard sometimes.
> > >
> > > if you dont wanna play pvp then dont play it. gizmos should remain for mat only.
> > > pvp makes you plenty of gold and, dungeon skins, clovers ascended gear. there is no need for more.
> >
> > Why so aggressive? And the No hat on?
> >
> > Anyway something needs to change in pvp less and less play the gamemode. I got 9.3k haours in pvp and something Nice added to the players that have alot time invested can get something Nice for it i don't think that is to much to ask for.
>
> Because if you are not motivated to get a team and trs to win mat than you are not qualified for gizmos
Even getting a team and practicing a good amount what are really the chances.
I mean in NA how many ppl that were not carried by team USA got gizmos last 12 months.
I mean they lost twice right so max 20 ppl if team USA carried 1 guy each time they won
Im in favor of degatekeep the mode, not the way he is suggesting maybe
-
> @"phokus.8934" said:
> If they restricted f2p accounts to unranked only then this would solve a lot in the short term.
It wouldnt, most bots are scourge, like 70% followed by mirage like 15%.
Out of 2 hackers I've seen 1 was dh the other one core necro
Those bot guys are mostly gold farmers and sellers so they actually want their accounts to be able to send emails
-
Oh well
NA silver 3 division is crowded with bots
Hackers Ive seen 2 last months
But bots oh god
I wish i had time and HD space to record a lot of matches
But i do have footage of fighting 2 bots in v2 deathmatch and they stop working when time goes 0
-
> @"avey.4201" said:
> all the bots are in gold during the spam meta, stay in bronze/silver to play with humans.
If you actually add those bots to your friendlist you'll see they are all silver 3
-
up to gold 2 you get even matches in terms of matchmaking
once you hit gold 3 you can be placed with top 10 players, then it's just a matter of lucky if you playing with or against them.
If you playing with them you prolly gonna win unless you afk, your chances are high even afk.
If you playing against them you can play the best game of your life and your chances are like 10%
-
I'd be not surprised if they simply have removed this feature like they done with idle disconnect
-
Try playing with a character under level 10, then you get distracted and match begins and your second weapon set is not there.
Amazing feeling
-
First thing that comes to mind reading the first paragraph (and that is all i read) is that you are not as good as you think
-
DH get 1 shot if hit in stealth is the only change i want
-
Or make elite map icons instead of just core class icons
-
Nice by your logic i can prove dh is bad by having 40% winrate on a video
Let's gatekeep it guardian mains
-
> @"Leonidrex.5649" said:
> > @"FrownyClown.8402" said:
> > > @"Leonidrex.5649" said:
> > > > @"Khalisto.5780" said:
> > > > > @"Leonidrex.5649" said:
> > > > > > @"Khalisto.5780" said:
> > > > > > I never understood why weaver has such an agressive potential but still have easy access to barrier and waterfields.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They should move all that barrier to earth and then deal with a potential super sustain tempest
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Honestly they should just buff core ele to viable and then deal with its elites later, we know they're very good nerfing those classes
> > > > >
> > > > > mb if weaver didnt get 50% max hp as barrier for doing random kitten they wouldnt have to keep core ele kitten. but what do I know, I dont play ele.
> > > > > But when I fight weaver or core the thing that stands the most is this kitten kitten barrier.
> > > >
> > > > Core has no barrier unless it is running sanctuary
> > >
> > > exactly my point, if you buff core survivability then weaver gets it on top of spammable barriers and gets broken, if you buff core dmg, weaver gets it and abuses the damage while still being tanky due to spammable barrier.
> >
> > Its can be done if it forces weaver to lose something in return. Providing a barrier on signet use would make signet ele a decent choice while forcing weaver to give up valuable utilities to make use of it. They could also do something like barrier on earth attunement, but give it a 9s icd so weavers cant abuse it. They could also provide a 9s internal cooldown for each element on elemental attunement and providing more access to protection in earth traitline. Right now arcane is better than earth because its protection uptime is superior to earth and it also provides healing might fury and regen.
>
> on one hand it could work, on another. can you imagine fighting earth weaver then ? absolute brainless bunker the likes that were never seen before...
Thats why i said they have to move barrier from weaver traitline to earth, at least some of it. So core that lacks survivability gets some and weaver that haa a lot of everything would have to invest one full traitline to get it
-
I dont think they have ever changed something cuz of community feedback
Patch goes out exactly as prepatch notes
-
> @"Leonidrex.5649" said:
> > @"Khalisto.5780" said:
> > I never understood why weaver has such an agressive potential but still have easy access to barrier and waterfields.
> >
> > They should move all that barrier to earth and then deal with a potential super sustain tempest
> >
> > Honestly they should just buff core ele to viable and then deal with its elites later, we know they're very good nerfing those classes
>
> mb if weaver didnt get 50% max hp as barrier for doing random kitten they wouldnt have to keep core ele kitten. but what do I know, I dont play ele.
> But when I fight weaver or core the thing that stands the most is this kitten kitten barrier.
Core has no barrier unless it is running sanctuary
-
I never understood why weaver has such an agressive potential but still have easy access to barrier and waterfields.
They should move all that barrier to earth and then deal with a potential super sustain tempest
Honestly they should just buff core ele to viable and then deal with its elites later, we know they're very good nerfing those classes
3 of the same class all in a single match
in Player vs. Player
Posted
I had 3 warriors on AT
Imagine rank