Jump to content
  • Sign Up

videoboy.4162

Members
  • Posts

    358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by videoboy.4162

  1. > @"Linken.6345" said:

    > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

    > > > @"Linken.6345" said:

    > > > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

    > > > > > @"Linken.6345" said:

    > > > > > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

    > > > > > > > @"SpyderArachnid.5619" said:

    > > > > > > > > @"coso.9173" said:

    > > > > > > > > why are people even talking about lgbtq issues just because Jormag has a female voice? Or did I miss anything else? dragons are pretty much agender, they can have a female voice for the same reasons others can have a male voice, it doesn't mean anything, and definitely doesn't mean the dragon is part of the lgbtq community or anything. I really don't see the big deal at all.

    > > > > > > >

    > > > > > > > Because Anet popped into Twitter and told everyone that Jormag is non-binary and is voiced by a female actress. And then of course, there is this section from the magazine calling Jormag a "her" now and talking about gender identity of dragons:

    > > > > > > >

    > > > > > > > https://s3.amazonaws.com/guildwars2.com_uploads/livingworldmagazine/icebroodsaga_magazine_EN/files/assets/common/pages-content/pg05-0609%202.png?uni=ca500978769f68ed90e960fb542f5102

    > > > > > > >

    > > > > > > > And now there is a bunch of confusion as to how this affects the already established lore and story of the game with Jormag being a male. Now they are changing Jormag to a female and saying their gender is non-binary. As well, the Sons of Svanir would never follow a female/non-binary dragon as they are misogynistic. So it makes absolutely no sense that Jormag would be female. It's change for the sake of diversity/pandering. Thus the whole bringing up the LGBT thing.

    > > > > > >

    > > > > > > I think I'm missing some information somewhere. Can you link me to where the Devs stated Jormag is non-binary and/or to where Jormag is now referred to as "her?" It's not in the link you gave already.

    > > > > >

    > > > > > Maybe click the red links in the OP?

    > > > > >

    > > > > >

    > > > > >

    > > > > > https://s3.amazonaws.com/guildwars2.com_uploads/livingworldmagazine/icebroodsaga_magazine_EN/5-6/index.html

    > > > > >

    > > > > > Second link you have to click on jormag to read about it hint its in the red texts.

    > > > >

    > > > > I did click the link in the OP. That red text is just Gorrik commenting on why Taimi used "they" instead of "he" since they'd started learning more about how Dragons present themselves. He's commenting on how they don't know whether Jormag really presents as male or not. The tweet is a better source, but I wish he'd elaborated more.

    > > > >

    > > >

    > > > It clearly reads She not He.

    > >

    > > She is in reference to Aurene, not Jormag.

    >

    > I say thats unclear just becouse the first sentence speak about aurene evolved our understanding about dragons gender identity, dont mean that the sentece after still is speaking about aurene could very well be jormag

     

    The comma in that sentence prevents "her" from referring to anyone but Aurene . Gorrik is telling you to ask Aurene about dragon identities.

  2. > @"Linken.6345" said:

    > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

    > > > @"Linken.6345" said:

    > > > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

    > > > > > @"SpyderArachnid.5619" said:

    > > > > > > @"coso.9173" said:

    > > > > > > why are people even talking about lgbtq issues just because Jormag has a female voice? Or did I miss anything else? dragons are pretty much agender, they can have a female voice for the same reasons others can have a male voice, it doesn't mean anything, and definitely doesn't mean the dragon is part of the lgbtq community or anything. I really don't see the big deal at all.

    > > > > >

    > > > > > Because Anet popped into Twitter and told everyone that Jormag is non-binary and is voiced by a female actress. And then of course, there is this section from the magazine calling Jormag a "her" now and talking about gender identity of dragons:

    > > > > >

    > > > > > https://s3.amazonaws.com/guildwars2.com_uploads/livingworldmagazine/icebroodsaga_magazine_EN/files/assets/common/pages-content/pg05-0609%202.png?uni=ca500978769f68ed90e960fb542f5102

    > > > > >

    > > > > > And now there is a bunch of confusion as to how this affects the already established lore and story of the game with Jormag being a male. Now they are changing Jormag to a female and saying their gender is non-binary. As well, the Sons of Svanir would never follow a female/non-binary dragon as they are misogynistic. So it makes absolutely no sense that Jormag would be female. It's change for the sake of diversity/pandering. Thus the whole bringing up the LGBT thing.

    > > > >

    > > > > I think I'm missing some information somewhere. Can you link me to where the Devs stated Jormag is non-binary and/or to where Jormag is now referred to as "her?" It's not in the link you gave already.

    > > >

    > > > Maybe click the red links in the OP?

    > > >

    > > >

    > > >

    > > > https://s3.amazonaws.com/guildwars2.com_uploads/livingworldmagazine/icebroodsaga_magazine_EN/5-6/index.html

    > > >

    > > > Second link you have to click on jormag to read about it hint its in the red texts.

    > >

    > > I did click the link in the OP. That red text is just Gorrik commenting on why Taimi used "they" instead of "he" since they'd started learning more about how Dragons present themselves. He's commenting on how they don't know whether Jormag really presents as male or not. The tweet is a better source, but I wish he'd elaborated more.

    > >

    >

    > It clearly reads She not He.

     

    She is in reference to Aurene, not Jormag.

  3. > @"Linken.6345" said:

    > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

    > > > @"SpyderArachnid.5619" said:

    > > > > @"coso.9173" said:

    > > > > why are people even talking about lgbtq issues just because Jormag has a female voice? Or did I miss anything else? dragons are pretty much agender, they can have a female voice for the same reasons others can have a male voice, it doesn't mean anything, and definitely doesn't mean the dragon is part of the lgbtq community or anything. I really don't see the big deal at all.

    > > >

    > > > Because Anet popped into Twitter and told everyone that Jormag is non-binary and is voiced by a female actress. And then of course, there is this section from the magazine calling Jormag a "her" now and talking about gender identity of dragons:

    > > >

    > > > https://s3.amazonaws.com/guildwars2.com_uploads/livingworldmagazine/icebroodsaga_magazine_EN/files/assets/common/pages-content/pg05-0609%202.png?uni=ca500978769f68ed90e960fb542f5102

    > > >

    > > > And now there is a bunch of confusion as to how this affects the already established lore and story of the game with Jormag being a male. Now they are changing Jormag to a female and saying their gender is non-binary. As well, the Sons of Svanir would never follow a female/non-binary dragon as they are misogynistic. So it makes absolutely no sense that Jormag would be female. It's change for the sake of diversity/pandering. Thus the whole bringing up the LGBT thing.

    > >

    > > I think I'm missing some information somewhere. Can you link me to where the Devs stated Jormag is non-binary and/or to where Jormag is now referred to as "her?" It's not in the link you gave already.

    >

    > Maybe click the red links in the OP?

    >

    >

    >

    > https://s3.amazonaws.com/guildwars2.com_uploads/livingworldmagazine/icebroodsaga_magazine_EN/5-6/index.html

    >

    > Second link you have to click on jormag to read about it hint its in the red texts.

     

    I did click the link in the OP. That red text is just Gorrik commenting on why Taimi used "they" instead of "he" since they'd started learning more about how Dragons present themselves. He's commenting on how they don't know whether Jormag really presents as male or not. The tweet is a better source, but I wish he'd elaborated more.

     

  4. > @"SpyderArachnid.5619" said:

    > > @"coso.9173" said:

    > > why are people even talking about lgbtq issues just because Jormag has a female voice? Or did I miss anything else? dragons are pretty much agender, they can have a female voice for the same reasons others can have a male voice, it doesn't mean anything, and definitely doesn't mean the dragon is part of the lgbtq community or anything. I really don't see the big deal at all.

    >

    > Because Anet popped into Twitter and told everyone that Jormag is non-binary and is voiced by a female actress. And then of course, there is this section from the magazine calling Jormag a "her" now and talking about gender identity of dragons:

    >

    > https://s3.amazonaws.com/guildwars2.com_uploads/livingworldmagazine/icebroodsaga_magazine_EN/files/assets/common/pages-content/pg05-0609%202.png?uni=ca500978769f68ed90e960fb542f5102

    >

    > And now there is a bunch of confusion as to how this affects the already established lore and story of the game with Jormag being a male. Now they are changing Jormag to a female and saying their gender is non-binary. As well, the Sons of Svanir would never follow a female/non-binary dragon as they are misogynistic. So it makes absolutely no sense that Jormag would be female. It's change for the sake of diversity/pandering. Thus the whole bringing up the LGBT thing.

     

    I think I'm missing some information somewhere. Can you link me to where the Devs stated Jormag is non-binary and/or to where Jormag is now referred to as "her?" It's not in the link you gave already.

  5. > @"ugrakarma.9416" said:

    > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

    > > The snippet describing Primordus is bugging the heck out of me. The terms "fire" and "conflagration" are synonyms. Why are those the two words used to describe that particular Dragon?

    > >

    >

    > conflagration also means "violent political revolution" in some languages, it is an allusion: revolts that spread like wildfire. For some reason i dont know the second meaning has fallen into disuse / oblivion in English. In portuguese/spanish that word(conflagração) is more used in the sense of spreaded revolt than literal wildfire. .. the word orign is from latin conflagratio/confl-(conflict).

     

    I knew that was another usage, but it just didn't seem to fit in with what we know about Primordus. Maybe if it pops up in this new story, that definition will make more sense in reference to Primordus.

  6. I noticed a few topics on this that are from 2019, but wasn't sure which to bump.

     

    Several events in Lake Doric seem to be bugged in various ways. Several are stalled and some won't start at all. This is preventing map progress and achievement completion. I realize this has been a chaotic year for Anet, but I was hoping someone could let us know if these bugs are being worked on? If it'll be a while before they're fixed, that's understandable and I can play on another map. If they might be fixed soon, then I'll know to keep checking instead of waiting on that map. Thanks for any help given!

     

    @"Stephane Lo Presti.7258"

     

  7. > @"deatine.2498" said:

    > From what little we know Bangar Ruinbringer also seems to be insidious and scheming. It might just be that he's the kind of leader who knows how to not get their own paws dirty.

    >

    > What surprised me much more was the fact that he called himself a _father_ to a cub. Even in our own personal story fathers are always just called sires and cubs grow up in Fahrars. It is either a petty oversight, or another sign that he does not practice what he preaches.

     

    I noticed that too. My guess was that he intentionally used "father" as a dig and Rytlock and his relationship with Rox & The Olmakhan.

  8. > @"Zushada.6108" said:

    > > @"LucianDK.8615" said:

    > > a major disappointment just discovered. The new varieal seedpouches you can craft is -ONE- time only. unlike the baseline sees that is automatically replanted. Yes, i will not be making anymore seed pouches.

    > > But I do not regret pushing cooking to 500. I like I got a new garden slot and another gobbler for the collection.

    >

    > Maybe I am misunderstanding what you mean but I was able to craft multiple copies of the varietal seed pouches. I harvested from Herb nodes in Tyria to get the extra seeds and then used the portable composter to salvage a bunch of stuff from my bank and inventory. Cheers,

     

    I think they mean that you can only harvest the ones you plant ONE time. Then you have to make new seeds to plant again.

  9. > @"Twospirit.4589" said:

    > > Cons:

    > > - Apparently, only your Chef can see the kitchen and none of your other toons

    > > - There is no Chef in the Home Instance (that I'm aware of), so you have to leave every time you need something sold by a Grandmaster.

    > > - Far too many items are needed that you can NOT deposit into your storage, so you need a lot of bag room

    > >

    > >

    > > Feel free to add your thoughts too!

    > >

    >

    > could anet allow for a seperate storage for these chef items, at least in our home instance that has the kitchen built?

     

    It would be awesome if they let us build a pantry for all the food stuff. That MIGHT give them more room in the normal material storage too. (not sure if they can remove items or replace then with new things though)

  10. So, with Cooking 500 rolling out today, we probably need a single thread for all the discussions. For my post, I'll list some pros and cons I've noticed so far.

     

    Pros:

    - Cooking seems a bit more useful now

    - The additions to the home instance are neat looking, especially that oven

    - Garden Plots are more useful now

    - Only a small time gate

    - Seems to be a great precursor to adding other professions to your Home Instance or possibly a test for player housing

     

    Cons:

    - Apparently, only your Chef can see the kitchen and none of your other toons

    - There is no Chef in the Home Instance (that I'm aware of), so you have to leave every time you need something sold by a Grandmaster.

    - Far too many items are needed that you can NOT deposit into your storage, so you need a lot of bag room

     

     

    Feel free to add your thoughts too!

     

  11. > @"Kalavier.1097" said:

    > Why do the player models need updated? WoW needed updates just to try to stay relevant graphically, as it's quite an ancient game now.

    >

    > Frankly, I think the models are quite good looking at the moment in guild wars 2.

     

    In my opinion*, the reason they need to be updated is because the newer things are better made than older ones. Newer hairs, armors, and weapons are all of better quality than the original stuff. I think everything should be brought up to the newer standards.

     

    * The opinion is that things should be more equal, it's fact that newer items are able to be of higher quality.

  12. I agree with OP. At the very least, I'd like the team to go back to the older Armor, hair, and weapon skins and bring them up to the quality of the newer items. It's obvious the team has made great strides in the quality of their work and I'd love that to carry over to older things.

  13. > @"Danikat.8537" said:

    > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

    > > I wish Anet would post the full list of sales all at once. I try to make sure I budget in gold/money to get certain things, but it would be far easier to prioritize if I had the whole list to plan with.

    >

    > I suspect this is why they don't announce them all at once. If we all knew what was coming and when it would be easier for players to plan ahead and for some people that would mean not buying things earlier on so they can save their gems for later, whereas if they don't have that information they might buy the earlier item and then buy more gems to get the later, more desirable ones too.

    >

    > It won't work like that for everyone of course. Some people will buy the earlier stuff and then skip later items even if they want them more because they can't afford it, some will end up not buying anything because they're always holding out for something better, and some would buy everything they want regardless. But that's marketing for you, it doesn't have to work on everyone, it just has to get some people to spend more than they'd otherwise want to.

     

    You're most likely correct, but I still wish for the other way. LOL

×
×
  • Create New...