videoboy.4162

I wish Anet would post the full list of sales all at once. I try to make sure I budget in gold/money to get certain things, but it would be far easier to prioritize if I had the whole list to plan with.

At least they finally changed it so that the Flax Fibers are on top.

I've been unable to complete this part as well. I've been trying for the past three days too =(

I didn't realize that I didn't have to use them, so I used 21. Made it go by really fast though. =D

> @"Genesis.8572" said:

> > @"videoboy.4162" said:

> > > @"zealex.9410" said:

> > > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> I believe that you misread that fight.

>

I could see that being the case, if we omitted his final comment. Your interpretation could very well be correct, but where does the final line fit?

> @"zealex.9410" said:

> > @"videoboy.4162" said:

> >

>

>

They dropped a massive hint in the end.

(I was gonna post it, but I don't think I'm doing the spoiler tag right and don't want to ruin anything.)

Shouldn't it come tomorrow or at least after reset tonight?

They need to track emotes too. The second someone uses an emote like SLEEP, they should immediately be tracked to ensure they're actually still playing. Literally just had a guy sleep by the treb the entire match. We lost very badly.

New Skins. Armor, Pets, Mounts, Hair, etc

I've always wondered why they don't sell Ranger Pet skins. I think a lot of people would be interested in that.

I'm wondering if they could put in an automated system that tracked WHERE a player was for an extended amount of time and whether or not they engaged in combat. Then, people that AFK in a certain area but move periodically, could still be punished. Capture points could be an exception to that rule, since some teams prefer to have a member guard their home.

It looks like they fixed it today, according to the patch notes.

"Fixed a bug in which the Hammer's Hoard point of interest could not be activated from outside of the gate."

> @"crepuscular.9047" said:

> nah, no more outfits, give me paragon armors from GW1 in armor sets, i miss my Paragon's Obsidian armors

> https://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Paragon_armor

I also want those! lol

I've been waiting on her Outfit too!

I was cool with the shoulders, I just really wish that those awesome shoes weren't hidden by crystals. I like everything from the ankles up. lol

I'll bump this one, instead of adding more clutter. (Maybe someone forgot?)

I've been experiencing this bug today too, roughly six months later. Played four or five matches and I'm still at 10/12 for participation.

> @"Just a flesh wound.3589" said:

> > @"videoboy.4162" said:

> > > @"Astralporing.1957" said:

> > > > @"videoboy.4162" said:

> > > > I wonder if they could go a different route than expected, and make Guild Wars 3 by moving Guild Wars 2 onto a new engine. After getting that engine ready, they could have all our progress and such from Guild Wars 2, but continue the story as Guild Wars 3.

> > > That's not a new game. That's an engine upgrade.

> > >

> > > If you make a new game, you will end up changing a lot more than just "upgrading" the game engine. Remember, that gw1->gw2 was supposed to be just that - an engine change to allow them to do things old engine didn't allow for. It's just that once they started tinkering, they decided that there were a lot of other things they wanted to change as well. The end result was, well, not something a lot of players wanted. I'm pretty sure that there's still a lot of veterans thinking that there were a ton of things that the previous game did better.

> > >

> > > And of course, once you change things too much, any idea of account continuity between games becomes problematic. It requires a lot of work, for often dubious results. As such, it's generally better to start afresh with a clean slate, with perhaps just a few perks (like HoM bonuses) given to old players.

> > >

> > > The problem is, of course, that most players do _not_ like ideas of player wipes and starting afresh. Not when they put a lot of time and effort to get to where they were at. As such, you can probably get away with it once. You are unlikely to be able to push it through twice.

> > >

> > >

> >

> > I know. I was just saying to update the engine and call the next expac "Guild Wars 3."

>

> In other words, pull a fast one on people buying what they think is a new game but it turns out to be the old game with an update?

>

Yes and no. It would be more along the lines of how they sell the current expansions, but include the base game free. The GW3 "expansion" would include GW2 on their upgraded engine, so people didn't lose all their stuff. Then the main part would be Guild Wars 3, with the story moving forward in some big way. I guess it'd be more like GW2.5. lol

It just seems like they could do a lot more with a better engine (armors, classes, new races, etc.) I'm not saying I have the best solution, I was just trying to think of something that would be a compromise between keeping the old game and starting a brand new one from scratch.

> @"Astralporing.1957" said:

> > @"videoboy.4162" said:

> > I wonder if they could go a different route than expected, and make Guild Wars 3 by moving Guild Wars 2 onto a new engine. After getting that engine ready, they could have all our progress and such from Guild Wars 2, but continue the story as Guild Wars 3.

> That's not a new game. That's an engine upgrade.

>

> If you make a new game, you will end up changing a lot more than just "upgrading" the game engine. Remember, that gw1->gw2 was supposed to be just that - an engine change to allow them to do things old engine didn't allow for. It's just that once they started tinkering, they decided that there were a lot of other things they wanted to change as well. The end result was, well, not something a lot of players wanted. I'm pretty sure that there's still a lot of veterans thinking that there were a ton of things that the previous game did better.

>

> And of course, once you change things too much, any idea of account continuity between games becomes problematic. It requires a lot of work, for often dubious results. As such, it's generally better to start afresh with a clean slate, with perhaps just a few perks (like HoM bonuses) given to old players.

>

> The problem is, of course, that most players do _not_ like ideas of player wipes and starting afresh. Not when they put a lot of time and effort to get to where they were at. As such, you can probably get away with it once. You are unlikely to be able to push it through twice.

>

>

I know. I was just saying to update the engine and call the next expac "Guild Wars 3."

I wonder if they could go a different route than expected, and make Guild Wars 3 by moving Guild Wars 2 onto a new engine. After getting that engine ready, they could have all our progress and such from Guild Wars 2, but continue the story as Guild Wars 3.

The Armor.

YAY PANTS!!!

I really want all that armor! I also want that blonde's hair for my female toons!

Hopefully, this new armor will include a pair of pants/tights for female scholars. Ones without a skirt over them.