What if the DSD's Name is Sedna?

[Raknar.4735]

> @"Sajuuk Khar.1509" said:

> > @"Raknar.4735" said:

> > She wouldn‘t share knowledge that turns out to be flat out wrong.

> Yes she would, if she honestly didn't know it was wrong why wouldn't she?

 

Obviously because she's the Goddess of Truth? She doesn't share lies. I don't see Balthazar going against his nature and spreading peace and water instead of war and fire.

[Konig Des Todes.2086]

> @"The Greyhawk.9107" said:

> > @"Fueki.4753" said:

> > > @"Sajuuk Khar.1509" said:

> > > Assuming it doesn't get resolved in EoD, the post EoD story could tie up the gods narrative by dealing with whatever Lyssa is up to.

> > Why should we deal with whatever Lyssa is up to in the Mists?

> > She departed from Tyria with the other gods.

> > @"Sajuuk Khar.1509" said:

> > > @"Fueki.4753" said:

> > > Why should we deal with whatever Lyssa is up to in the Mists?

> > > She departed from Tyria with the other gods.

> > When Balthazar dies at the end of Path of Fire he curses all of the gods for betraying him except Lyssa, and Anet has said there is a reason for that.

> >

> > Given that he was previously using an artifact of Lyssa to disguise himself as Lazarus, his lack of cursing Lyssa alongside the other gods, that the Orrian history scrolls state that Lyssa was the one most connected to mortals, and had to be "commanded" by the other gods to leave mortal towns and go to Arah once it was finished, as well as Anet's confirmation of there being a reason behind Balthazar not cursing Lyssa, its long been suspected that Lyssa is up to something.

> >

> > Anet has also previously stated that the story of the human gods isn't over yet, which adds further credibility to it.

>

> Plus, why not deal with Lyssa? A lot of us want to know more about what's going on with the Six. At least so long as they don't turn this Lyssa thread into Abaddon 3.0.

 

Further, it also doesn't need to be Lyssa specifically, but the Six Gods in general. They left the world because of the Elder Dragon threat. With that threat gone, the Six could return.

 

That said, no point in discussing with Sajuuk about their theories. They'll argue that they're right, even when you provide evidence that they're wrong, or even when the story develops counter to their theory.

[Sajuuk Khar.1509]

> @"Konig Des Todes.2086" said:

> That said, no point in discussing with Sajuuk about their theories. They'll argue that they're right, even when you provide evidence that they're wrong, or even when the story develops counter to their theory.

So says the king of such arguments.

 

[The Greyhawk.9107]

> @"Sajuuk Khar.1509" said:

> > @"Konig Des Todes.2086" said:

> > That said, no point in discussing with Sajuuk about their theories. They'll argue that they're right, even when you provide evidence that they're wrong, or even when the story develops counter to their theory.

> So says the king of such arguments.

>

 

I've not interacted with you enough make a determination either way, but Konig _has_ shown himself to be willing to admit it when he's wrong.